Project 1999

Project 1999 (/forums/index.php)
-   Off Topic (/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=19)
-   -   Russians Behind DNC attack! (/forums/showthread.php?t=248883)

Raev 07-26-2016 07:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jarnauga (Post 2329781)
Raev: 97% of the world scientists agree on human made global warming. 97% of people way smarter than you and me. Now i'm sure you think you're smarter than that, but let me tell you: you're not.

Speak for yourself; I have a PhD from a top 5 institution worldwide in my field.

Anyway, I think I'm done with this thread. It's pretty boring to read 50 million appeals to authority.

big_ole_jpn 07-26-2016 07:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Raev (Post 2329788)
Speak for yourself; I have a PhD from a top 5 institution worldwide in my field.

Anyway, I think I'm done with this thread. It's pretty boring to read 50 million appeals to authority.

You got the balls to share which field? Feels like a social science to me.

Jarnauga 07-26-2016 07:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Raev (Post 2329788)
Speak for yourself; I have a PhD from a top 5 institution worldwide in my field.

Anyway, I think I'm done with this thread. It's pretty boring to read 50 million appeals to authority.

Yeah well i'm the poker world champion 7 years in a row, so my opinion on global warming is totally relevant

Lune 07-26-2016 07:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Raev (Post 2329774)
Also Lune, I don't understand why you seem totally unable to grasp the simple concept that one cannot determine causal relationships by pure observation, as one can never rule out a hidden joint cause, but your mind seems only capable of generating a stream of irrelevant straw men and insults. Your coworkers must find you delightful.

If there's a simple concept to grasp, it's that you can accumulate strong evidence for causation with a combination of observational and experimental data.

For example, we accumulated enough evidence about the accumulation of lead in the environment to stop putting it on our fuel. If they had listened to people like you, we'd still be spewing lead everywhere because we were never able to actually experimentally verify that lead was actually navigating the complex pathway from gasoline additive to retarded children because there was no parallel universe to act as a control.

I do not insult unless insulted first or it's someone I do not respect. Given that your first words in this thread were disparaging my intelligence, it's a little hypocritical to whine about it.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Raev (Post 2329788)
Anyway, I think I'm done with this thread. It's pretty boring to read 50 million appeals to authority.

I didn't appeal to authority until my third post, and only because you attacked the integrity and sincerity of that authority to try and weaken a scientific opinion. You can't assault an authority and then whine when I defend it. Everything you're accusing others of in this thread, you did in your very first post.

Pokesan 07-26-2016 07:38 PM

raev already declared himself the victor sorry you lost

AzzarTheGod 07-26-2016 07:41 PM

Man Raev hit a lot of PHD dunks in this thread.

Daywolf 07-26-2016 07:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jarnauga (Post 2329781)
Raev: 97% of the world scientists agree on human made global warming. 97% of people way smarter than you and me. Now i'm sure you think you're smarter than that, but let me tell you: you're not.

People still spout this myth? hahahaha!
What do I care about 79 selected "scientists" churning out a 97% consensus in accordance with their bring home the bacon peer-review papers?
What parallel universe do you come from where there are only 79 scientists in the "world"?

big_ole_jpn 07-26-2016 07:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lune (Post 2329794)
If they had listened to people like you, we'd still be spewing lead everywhere because we were never able to actually experimentally verify that lead was actually navigating the complex pathway from gasoline additive to retarded children because there was no parallel universe to act as a control.

https://i.imgur.com/lm9JggY.png

maskedmelon 07-26-2016 07:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Daywolf (Post 2329802)
People still spout this myth? hahahaha!
What do I care about 79 selected "scientists" churning out a 97% consensus in accordance with their meat and potatoes peer-review papers?
What parallel universe do you come from where there are only 79 scientists in the "world"?

This is an important point and deserves quoting ^^

AzzarTheGod 07-26-2016 07:44 PM

Yeah but spewing mercury everywhere is safe apparently.

I have to sustain Raev's science on the basis that mercury is ok in 2016 but lead is not.

Poison tree theory, if 1 part of an argument doesn't jive then all of it must be thrown out.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:31 PM.

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.