![]() |
Quote:
I'm going to try and get it regardless, I'm just curious. |
the more haste is always better, but the + attack seems to be pretty good.
Not parsed the difference, not sure how I would (maybe blunt or pierce in primary?) but feels good to use. |
Quote:
Cause I do NOT use my Firefist spell. You've got me curious now if that's a big mistake, not to be using it. |
Oops ignore my staff of battle comment, i thought i clicked on the warrior twink thread.
|
Quote:
I pretty much always cast it anyway, otherwise I may as well not be a ranger. |
Quote:
I never saw Ranger as a class that absolutely has to utilize every little advantage it possibly can, but if it would serve me better, I guess I can try to start breaking some lazy habits. |
haste is incredibly important, especially sub 60 when you arent getting raid buffed constantly. the damage output inrease going from 21 haste to 40 haste is.... very easily calculatable. 140/121 is 15% more damage; thats alot. thats more incremental dps than youll get at 60 going from a jade mace primary to a swiftblade of zek primary. as the poster above mentioned... attack is also very important at the high end. generally speaking about 10 atk is 1% increased dps (its much more complicated than this); and once you got your weapons and cap strength and haste, its the last frontier of increasing damage.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
its cheap because its not really that good for 95% of blue players
|
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:27 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.