Originally Posted by Eunomia (Post 1941736)

I don't have avatars shown. I made a decision based on the information I had. So you can disagree with it, but you can't attach it to favoritism or whatever other delusional idea you have.

Originally Posted by grannock (Post 1941803)

Who is more pathetic in your opinion, the guy that delevels after he gets his epic mage pet, or this guy, whos immersion is ruined because colgate's avatar profile displays a bottle of toothpaste?

Originally Posted by Eunomia (Post 1941713)

Ha

I think all these things should be directed at me, not Sirken. I don't know any of you by more than the character name I am talking to at that moment unless I spend the time to try to put together all your alias' ....which I don't.

I am the one that decided the name Colgate didn't need to be changed. ME It was put before me to make sure there was no bias. I was presented with the name "Colgate" knowing nothing else.

1) It is not offensive (My first and foremost reason for ever deciding to change a name)
2) While it is a popular toothpaste, it is also University. This exempts it from the trade marked issue , IN MY OPINION.
3) When changing a name, I take into consideration all issues and weigh them based on level of character. If a high level character, if at all possible I don't want to strip the reputation - EITHER GOOD OR BAD - by changing a name.

Blame me for not changing his name. I don't care. I made the decision and I am still confident in my decision.

Originally Posted by Syft-X (Post 1941772)

I'm just asking for equality here Colgate petitioned my name Sirken changed it I accept the fact that my name violated the naming policy and was changed.

But this rule shouldn't be selectively enforced but evenly enforced for all rule offenders.
That's whats best for the server. If the person named Colgate has the company logo not the university then obviously it refers to the Toothpaste company and not some university no one has ever heard of.

If you can't see the pictures, turn them on for a moment and take a look. None of these reasons would make any sense to anyone.

Originally Posted by Syft-X (Post 1941752)

If someone can petition people for breaking the rules while they themselves are breaking the same rules for everyone to see and the rules aren't evenly enforced it is a pretty huge experience ruin-er and bad image for the server as a whole.



Your opinion sounds biased because I assure I never petitioned Colgate's name until he petitioned mine, if you have a problem with people using GM's to go after their enemies then take it up with Colgate and stop trying to derail the convo to protect your guildmates.

Originally Posted by Glenzig (Post 1941819)

Because the only people that disagree with you must be in Empire right?

Originally Posted by Eunomia (Post 1941825)

I'm pretty sure this thread was about fruit snacks.