Creating new precedent with a bored and famously litigious billionaire is a plan so brilliant AOC could have thought it up

"The President, Vice President and all Civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors."

The senate has no jurisdiction for anything other than those explicitly mentioned in constitution.

Actually the constitutional precedents go against it being subject to court challenge. It's not a 100% impossibility, but it would be very difficult to challenge your impeachment conviction in a separate judicial proceeding (not to mention that the Supreme Court probably wouldn't even agree to hear the case because they would say their job is to defer to the legislature on impeachment rules and results of conviction, which is true).

"The judiciary, and the Supreme Court in particular, were not chosen to have any role in impeachments" that's from a 1993 SCOTUS case. So, looks like again you don't know what you're talking about.

It's also arguable about whether it requires a separate vote. Some might say it does, but there's also precedent for viewing it as a default outcome of a conviction.

Glad to have helped you become more informed today! Just another positive to today on top of the inauguration!

Is this how we sound when sassing the Red hats?

Wow rude 😂

Speaking as a lawyer, you're kind of misconstruing that quote. If a court were to look at that, they would say that the quote relates to what the President can be REMOVED from office for. It speaks to what actions by the President are needed for removal. It doesn't speak to whether they can convict a former President in a trial conducted after he's left office for an impeachment that occurred while he was in office.

Legally/constitutionally speaking, they are essentially fully within their right to hold a trial in the Senate (and in fact need to do so now that they have impeached him). What they probably couldn't do would be to impeach him AFTER he's left office...but there's nothing preventing a trial from occurring after he's left office, because removal from office isn't the only penalty that is applied and the impeachment occurred while he was still in office.

There's no precedent for a President even being removed, so all your big city lawyer talk is just that - talk. 🦜

I was right. It doesn't mention anything about being out of office. The trial will continue. Prove I'm wrong.

Where was it in the constitution where the senate could try private citizens?

No, like most things in life, you have no idea what you are talking about.

Insulting the person when unable to provide facts. That's cool. I hope your problems get better.

The election was a scam he lost nothing, look at the maps. They fed stacks of biden ballots in the machines over and over in battleground cities like philly and pittsburgh / atlanta etc

sorry you lost at life