Originally Posted by big_ole_jpn (Post 2317035)

Technical foul.

The disagreement arises from plebs adhering to the plebeian definition of "dating" as implying some kind of a serious commitment. You see, the typical consumptive automaton is not capable of maintaining genuine emotional connections with other humans, and instead forms transactional bonds centered around the exchange of goods and sex, held together moment to moment with the conversational duct tape of memespouting (from "much sex very wow" to "are you coming with me to the Bernie rally Friday?").

The arrangement "dating" would seem distinct from a serious relationship to a living human since typically it would only serve as a formality (ensuring the transactional part of the relationship will function) at the beginning of a human bond. However, to a typical roboperson who would settle for a vagina attached to a parrot that repeats hilarious stuff from the talmudvision during what would be intense emotional episodes, dating and a serious relationship are in fact one and the same, since an automaton cannot ever progress past the transactional formalities and into the emotional phase of the relationship. Of course I have never "dated" anyone even as a formality as I possess both halves of the transactional relationship due to the high value placed on sexual relations with me and my own material success, but I think my hypothesis and consequent judgment are reasonably well-informed.

Because you have already consented to a long-term relationship with a weakened entity who depends upon you for sustenance, breaking the arrangement would constitute a violation of the contract. It's up to you if you want that on your conscience (such as it is) but it wouldn't put you in the right to suddenly start claiming you're a real human being with feelings since you claimed brainlessness when the pussy was offered not just for a night or two, but for so long that a dependence ensued.

Within the paradigm of being a idiot retard I can see how Azzar could be considered in the wrong, but as far as the wider world of masters of the universe is concerned, the God is 100% correct. Sit down child.

Originally Posted by Tenlaar (Post 2317153)

Do you guys not know what a misogynist is, or is this a clumsy attempt at being trolls?

Originally Posted by pickled_heretic (Post 2317223)

I didn't read the thread, but the fact that you asked that question indicates that they are at least moderately effective trolls

Originally Posted by pickled_heretic (Post 2317223)

I didn't read the thread, but the fact that you asked that question indicates that they are at least moderately effective trolls

Originally Posted by Tenlaar (Post 2317343)

Meh. The point of trolling is to inspire rage and/or rusted jimmies. It's not effective if it just doesn't make sense.

Originally Posted by Lune (Post 2317141)

Originally Posted by Tenlaar (Post 2317153)

Do you guys not know what a misogynist is, or is this a clumsy attempt at being trolls?