100% Agreed

Believe whatever you want, but don't try to co-opt statistics or quantum physics to do it, cool?

ah shit someone brought up the zodiac, looks like we've gone full retard.

I hope so hard that you are trolling.

the only thing ive learned from this thread is op likely very annoying irl

One could replace the word luck with karma if they are spiritually minded.

There's plenty of scientific research on how your thoughts affect the physical world. Dr Emoto's water crystals come to mind.

Whether "luck" or "karma" are real are debatable. It's interesting to note though that people who consider themselves "lucky" tend to focus on the positive things in life. Perhaps their subconscious filters out the negative?

Although none of the hypotheses in this thread are false, in the sense of 100% false, they do not satisfy at least two of the main criteria of science. First, they aren't falsifiable and almost certainly violate Occam's razor.

lol

The problem with OP's argument is that it asserts a global truth based on an individual's observations. While I do believe in the philosophy of "mind over matter" in that your mind can perceive reality in a different way and thus shape an individual reality (e.g. schizophrenics), it is not an adequate observation for global truths which must be tested and verified amongst other people. It is basically a problem of a small sample size.