Lexical |
10-03-2012 12:01 PM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kraftwerk
(Post 739078)
Obama and Romney both report to Big Finance and other major Corps. Both will have an equal inefficiency resulting in zero actual change for the better. Both will perpetuate American debt slavery and another lost decade. My conclusion being that they are the same due to results being the same for either one being elected...
|
From the picture posted by dredge, I doubt you will disagree with me that companies like Harvard Uni, M$, and Google have a completely different financial stance than that of B.O.A, Goldman Sachs, and Citigroup. Bill Gates has said that he should be paying more taxes even after he donated billions of dollars to charities. I am sure we all heard about the big financial scandal that Goldman Sachs did, but what big financial scandal has Harvard U. done? How can you not see the dichotomy between the two sides?
Now correct me if I am wrong, but the basis of your argument is that since both parties received the most money from entities with larger disposable income, they are in bed with their campaign backers and answer to them. Now, I am going to ignore the giant leap in conclusive reasoning and instead offer a counter. Could it be that those big corporations backed the parties because they like their fiscal stances? This would then lead to the whole thing just receiving money for doing a good job.
|