Project 1999

Project 1999 (/forums/index.php)
-   Green Server Chat (/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=73)
-   -   Verix Remains Kill Thief (/forums/showthread.php?t=432105)

Rimitto 06-26-2024 03:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jimjam (Post 3689311)
P99 tends to have punitive, not restorative justice (outside of raid targets).

The loot will just be deleted, not moved.

Justice from heaven or from hell.

Jimjam 06-26-2024 05:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rimitto (Post 3689314)
Justice from heaven or from hell.

Personally I like ironic justice. I would have TPed and bound the perps in VP at a particularly treacherous spot.

Trexller 06-26-2024 05:05 AM

now im convinced they trained an ai to play eq

Duik 06-26-2024 09:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Trexller (Post 3689317)
now im convinced they trained an ai to play eq

I agree. Rimito is defo a bot.
In 2002 a free speech advocate put up a winmx chat that had ZERO rules (except flood spam), turns out he was doing a doctorate (or whatever it was) and was using us as guinea pigs by parsing our chats and manipulating the data to his needs. Tried to work out a way to follow different threads within the group chat.
10 peeps all responding to each other both as a group and individual questions. I know not what he did with these data.
Polits talk does not train an AI to play eq. DSM waxing lyrical about strats, stats and techniques however does.
Congrats DSM. You are ai fodder.

WarpathEQ 06-26-2024 10:46 AM

Confused why this is a thread. The proper channel is /petition if you have a camp dispute. In my experience if you are in line of sight of the mob in question and have been clearing the PH consistently the GMs would rule in your favor that it was your camp/mob.

Line of sight being critical, I had a ruling go against me when a group moved into a room my group had been killing for hours. Because we weren't physically sitting in the room (in line of sight) the other group got to keep the camp. There was still some coaching provided to the camp stealers as there should have been communication and ultimately as the group that was there first it was our choice of which camp to take and which to give up to them.

Old_PVP 06-26-2024 10:49 AM

Sounds like PVP would have solved this made up issue.

GMs just need to enable it and make their lives easier.

Trexller 06-26-2024 03:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Duik (Post 3689322)
I agree. Rimito is defo a bot.
In 2002 a free speech advocate put up a winmx chat that had ZERO rules (except flood spam), turns out he was doing a doctorate (or whatever it was) and was using us as guinea pigs by parsing our chats and manipulating the data to his needs. Tried to work out a way to follow different threads within the group chat.
10 peeps all responding to each other both as a group and individual questions. I know not what he did with these data.
Polits talk does not train an AI to play eq. DSM waxing lyrical about strats, stats and techniques however does.
Congrats DSM. You are ai fodder.

I got a feeling that you could just give one of these AI software things access to macroquest and the p99 wiki then it would do fine

loramin 06-26-2024 05:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Trexller (Post 3689338)
I got a feeling that you could just give one of these AI software things access to macroquest and the p99 wiki then it would do fine

The technology just isn't there yet.

Now, if you're a programmer, you can absolutely write an EQ-playing bot, with or without "AI". But if you want to be able to get ChaptGPT to farm spiderling silks for you, you're going to be waiting awhile.

WarpathEQ 06-26-2024 05:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by loramin (Post 3689342)
The technology just isn't there yet.

Now, if you're a programmer, you can absolutely write an EQ-playing bot, with or without "AI". But if you want to be able to get ChaptGPT to farm spiderling silks for you, you're going to be waiting awhile.

Or forever as it were, ChatGPT and virtually all accessible AI products are simply language learning models, they deal in text so the only game ChatGPT will ever play on its own are text based games. Although they will make for great keyboard warriors soon so they would be well suited for the P99 forums.

Tesla is really the only company I've seen developing AI based on video inputs as opposed to text inputs and outputing real world range of motion, so there is a chance that the future of EQ could include auto-piloting bots. Even that is unlikely to be viable in our lifetime due to the massive amounts of compute and training materials needed to train this type of AI.

Trexller 06-26-2024 07:46 PM

MQ2 and/or KISSassist can totally automate EQ

wouldn't it be pretty easy to give a learning software access to MQ2 or KISSassist

DOD has learning software that outperforms human fighter pilots, making software that plays EQ should be a breeze


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:53 AM.

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.