Project 1999

Project 1999 (/forums/index.php)
-   Off Topic (/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=19)
-   -   Does anybody know anything about quality essay writing? (/forums/showthread.php?t=308777)

mickmoranis 10-12-2018 04:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by America (Post 2792271)
LOL's forum is pop in today

https://youtu.be/UX7V-rrjm_E

America 10-12-2018 04:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mickmoranis (Post 2792274)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0TKhe45jl1w

Schaduwridder 10-12-2018 05:11 PM

who would hire a tranny teach?

Answer: No one LOL

loramin 10-12-2018 05:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ahldagor (Post 2792273)
Rhetoric can be used to explain anything which legitimizes bullshit and the pretense of English majors. I majored in English and it's almost insufferable, but most papers are graded upon grammar and structure rather than content.

Dude, you went to a terrible college (or at least a college with a terrible English department)!

I too was an English (well Literature, same diff) major and my professors were nothing like that.

Patriam1066 10-12-2018 05:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by loramin (Post 2792303)
Dude, you went to a terrible college (or at least a college with a terrible English department)!

I too was an English (well Literature, same diff) major and my professors were nothing like that.

I went to rice and my professors graded papers based on our ability to prove our argument as opposed to the content of the argument. Ahl describes rhetoric. You’re describing bias, unless I’m misunderstanding. A paper should not be graded on the position taken by the author unless it’s absurd. I wrote that Heart of Darkness was Conrad being racist against Europeans since why else would Kurtz be German, French, English, and Belgian? I’m sure no one like reading a young Patriam’s bull shit take on a British classic, but it was well written and so the grade reflected it

Ahldagor 10-12-2018 05:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by loramin (Post 2792303)
Dude, you went to a terrible college (or at least a college with a terrible English department)!

I too was an English (well Literature, same diff) major and my professors were nothing like that.

University of Houston for me. You? I had a litersture concentration as well. Even had a professor, David Mikics, ask to be told something new about Hamlet. I lol'd in class that day.

mickmoranis 10-12-2018 07:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Schaduwridder (Post 2792309)
What kind of loser goes to college to major in English

jesus I bet you suck at life and make jack shit

both the libtards lol

loramin 10-12-2018 08:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Schaduwridder (Post 2792309)
What kind of loser goes to college to major in English

jesus I bet you suck at life and make jack shit

I made six figures, before I decided to take time off and teach an online class.

mickmoranis 10-12-2018 08:01 PM

Just a reminder I have written some seriously publishable works on the boards.

loramin 10-13-2018 03:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Patriam1066 (Post 2792312)
I went to rice and my professors graded papers based on our ability to prove our argument as opposed to the content of the argument. Ahl describes rhetoric. You’re describing bias, unless I’m misunderstanding. A paper should not be graded on the position taken by the author unless it’s absurd. I wrote that Heart of Darkness was Conrad being racist against Europeans since why else would Kurtz be German, French, English, and Belgian? I’m sure no one like reading a young Patriam’s bull shit take on a British classic, but it was well written and so the grade reflected it

Oh I totally agree (well, except about Heart of Darkness being racist; it was definitely anti-European, but I don't think "racist" is accurate). But I was referring to the part about:

Quote:

but most papers are graded upon grammar and structure rather than content.
That's not rhetoric, that's grammar/structure. If you're in a college course and you're being graded on grammar, that is not a good course (or you're bad at English and shouldn't be in a college-level English/Literature course).

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ahldagor (Post 2792315)
University of Houston for me. You? I had a litersture concentration as well. Even had a professor, David Mikics, ask to be told something new about Hamlet. I lol'd in class that day.

University of California, Santa Cruz. On the Hamlet thing, I think it's the same with a lot of Shakespeare (and classics in general). I took a class on Postcolonial Literature that looked at the Tempest, and at the start I felt the same way: what could there possibly be new to say about The Tempest?

But when you start looking at it from a postcolonial angle you realize that all those people commenting on The Tempest for hundreds of years all looked at it the same way. None of them ever thought about how Caliban and Ariel represented the good/bad native being conquered by the European Prospero.

When you look at stuff from a different angle, even stuff like Shakespeare that has been analyzed to death, it's possible to find new things to say about it.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:33 PM.

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.