![]() |
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
Secondly, no DKP was carried over. Trust me. http://i.imgur.com/DWaVasf.png Haha, ow :( Oh well! |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Good post bud!
Trolls and people with nothing but disdain for anything anyone does on this server other than themselves will always exist though, so don't let the following pages and pages of nonsensical responses affect what you came here to clarify/explain. If anything this should resolve a lot of stuff for people who were beginning to "reach" pretty hard on what they thought was going on or why this all came to pass in the first place. It isn't logical to think that a new guild would knowingly try to circumvent any kind of rules with the possibility of being suspended. That could be a crippling blow to a guild that has been around for years, let alone one that is a week old. Why take the risk? Some will say "you should have known better" or "ignored huge red flags", but that wasnt the case. TMO split 4 ways and they still exist as their own entity which we are no longer a part of. If a guild splits 4 ways what would logically make a person think that after setting up a new webpage, new dkp system, teamspeak, new name, and leadership that you are still the same as you were before. If that isn't enough to separate you from a previous guild and start anew, than I have no idea what else would. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
So in the screenshot that is no longer working there's a line from someone in Forsaken saying "let's run this by Sirken". Why didn't that ever happen?
When I put forward the idea of dissolving the rotation (when it was clear that no one would agree to reform) we went to Sirken to make sure everything that we were doing was kosher. Forsaken did what they wanted with the justification of "well IB reformed and did what they wanted" A simple conversation with Sirken would have negated a lot of these problems I think. |
I would like to say that being completely unbiased in any of this, I can see where the confusion in all of this stems from. The following opinion is from someone who had not yet raided on project 1999. Therefore not from someone who carries around a "I hate all things TMO" badge, like many posting here already.
1. It has been stated that any new raiding guild is automatically Class R. 2. How can anyone expect a newly formed guild, albeit largely from an older long-standing class C guild, to just jump right into Class C type "competitive" raiding and not have the same chance to test their new raid leadership like any other "new" guild for an entire 30 days. You are setting up a situation where this guild, that is trying to do something good, is at a disadvantage and increasing their risk of failure. Rogean stated that 69 of 74 were formerly in "The Mystical Order". I would be interested to know of those 69 how many were in their previous guilds most recent successful raids. Numbers may not always tell the whole story. Now I have also seen screenshots of the posts allegedly regarding them "blatantly" trying to circumvent the class system. It seems to me all the post is saying, especially Detoxx's comment is just stating exactly what his post here says his intentions were. Good luck Forsaken, definitely dealt a bad hand in a difficult situation. Salt on the wound if you will Just this insignificant specks 2 cents based on what I have read/heard on Sirken's streams. |
Quote:
https://youtu.be/Rx6Z_wpZAFo?t=1h19m We also considered this as a strong rule of thumb that would dispel any doubt (But fuck us for expecting consistency on P99, right?) Quote:
We did wipe our DKP We did retire our guild page (www.tmoguild.org) We did install new leadership (only 2 officers were carried over. IB carried over several) And we did so having no idea we'd be punished for it. |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:15 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.