| BigHurb |
04-28-2014 03:43 PM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kazi
(Post 1431868)
The OP. He quoted something but didn't provide the source.
|
so how does that make your responsibility to research any less... got ... an ANTI-source?
if you dont see my source, google it.. you would have to be able to use your own brain. if you cant use your own brain, what is my job here again... to google something you wont read nor understand lol
http://www.oxitec.com/ - not exactly SkyNet but same amount of letters.
http://www.pri.org/stories/2014-04-2...t-dengue-fever
"Dr. Helen Wallace, of the organization GeneWatch is a frequent critic of Oxytec. She’s concerned about a British company “going to developing countries claiming they have a solution to a very serious problem there, without being totally transparent about the potential risks.”
One concern is that that female GM mosquitoes are sometimes released along with the males, and that their bites could cause allergic reactions. There’s also a risk that some of the offspring of the GM mosquitoes could survive, with unknown consequences."
now multiply that probability by the number of events or lives .. its GOING to happen
might not be disastrous event (could even be beneficial.. but that is really a scary bet to make, would you make it), but that the event has closer to a chance than 0, is not cause for 0 concern, as a scientifically minded person. art thou?
this kind of shit is "how it starts" .. we have a new game that no one realizes we're playing with the massive kinds of numbers now |
