this is the cheesiest shit ive read all day

anyways, violence begets violence. to say the perpetrators should face death only perpetuates and reinforces violent behaviors against innocents such as in this case. this isn't to say that the men and women in this specific case are by any means expected be let off lightly, but capital punishment serves no purpose.

I was more or less thinking along the lines of taking a katana and small pistol, asking around town and finding out who the two rapists were, and decapitating/ executing them with absolutely no feelings of regret.

All I said was that I advocate vigilante justice in cases like this. Am i not the one that said capital punishment costs too much? I thought I was.

That's kind of a flimsy argument by the way, to say that killing somebody for committing a violent act will only make more people commit violent acts..

really? prove it.

this might sound familiar to you, but culturally superior and sophisticated elite such as myself don't defend themselves or their views to the politically illiterate. i really don't care if you see a cause/effect relationship between violent acts and their subsequent punishment.

thankfully people like you aren't running the show, or we might end up with some fucked up hippie dystopia where murderers run rampant because if you killed them, 10 more might pop up in their place. thankfully the real world isn't like that. people fuck up and commit a crime, if it's bad enough they die. and then they're dead.

You are the one who made the weak claim so you prove it. pneub

didnt read

don't care :)

I think we can all agree that you're certifiably retarded if your argument relies on a "hippie dystopia" strawman scenario.

nah