![]() |
ranger dps = steady damange flow. dont expect to burn things down even with your best 2 dots up and DD spell spam.
|
My Live side guild leader was a Ranger. Always having the best gear available etc. He did great damage and actually saved the day a few times on bosses by tanking for a few seconds. He also took a Death Touch to every now and then though... haha ;)
Its basically the mind frame that you have of the Ranger that depicts how well you play the class. Everyone has a different opinion and the Ranger changed its appearance and play style throughout the game. So for the most part, a lot of people are terrible at the class due to not knowing what their role is. Identity crisis if you will. In my opinion, during classic; they are off tanks and primarily DPS within a group. They are also a huge benefit to a group with a Warrior tank. That is especially true when their is no enchanter present. Not to say a Ranger cannot tank, but it is indeed a hindrance on the healer of a group versus having a War/Pal/SK. I personally wouldnt ever tell someone to not play a Ranger, because I love having a quick root, a snare and some in combat fighting going. Versus having a caster that you have no idea if they are even there, they might even be afk and you would never know. |
Quote:
you wanna solo? CHECK you wanna group with all pet classes without getting hit? CHECK you wanna group in a all kiter group? CHECK you wanna wanna main tank? CHECK you wanna pull or just dps? DOUBLE CHECK now getting a group or a group to let you in(assuming they arent exp greedy) is more harder then actually adjusting your playing style. also cant wait to main slow when kunark comes outhttp://common.allakhazam.com/images/...85bf125a78.png |
Speaking as someone who's always played a healer class of some sort, while rangers might want to tank, I don't want to heal them if they are.
|
As soon as I get enough pp to slightly twink my first character its going to be a ranger. As someone said earlier they play kinda like rogues without backstab. Their spells are pretty useful and rangers will get a little better once kunark is released.
|
One of the best tanks I knew on live was a ranger. His preferred off tank was a ranger, too. We took down a lot of stuff with relatively few people actually, although there was a high ratio of healer types in our little cadre, heh. ( Ranger / Ranger / Druid (me) / Druid / Cleric / Chanter )
|
Quote:
|
I would have liked to see a parse on that group. I wouldnt blatantly call it a terrible group... but thats what Im thinking as I read that group make up. A ranger cannot wear most of the gear a War/Sk/Pal can so even though those druids(you) were probably doing some damage; Im sure they(you) were healing as well. Missing out on the mana for that extra dot/nuke. Its odd how you dont vividly notice an extra minute to a kill in EQ, or how downtime is expected; perceived to not be a penalty for having a bad group makeup. Imagine how much quicker things would have died with only a cleric healing in that group, not only being the only one.. but healing less often as well.
I never once said a Ranger "should" MT or that its ok, and in fact.. a few seconds is an eternity when fighting bosses with a Ranger as the tank. Everyones stomach is in a knot because the raid force doesnt know whether they are going to wipe or not. Where with a warrior; you at least have a higher degree of certainty that you wont fail. I agree with Ghesta, in that I would never openly want any Ranger to tank over a Warrior at lvl 35+. Pal / Sk is a completely different story at 50, so lets just leave them out of this for now. Also, another issue is that I dont mind having a Ranger or any other hybrid in my group simply because I do not share their exp burden in P1999 like you said. Your exp penalty is yours and yours alone. Love your enthusiasm though! Just stick to DPS / Utility... :) |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:20 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.