Project 1999

Project 1999 (/forums/index.php)
-   Green Server Chat (/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=73)
-   -   Item linking is not classic (/forums/showthread.php?t=339916)

silo32 11-06-2019 10:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Danth (Post 3016516)
Not in this case. Links could be taken out via a couple different methods. We experimentally played with disabling them during the course of UI work. The P1999 admins want links left in because they feel it reduces scamming and hence their own CS workload.

Danth

so its not classic but makes life easier on devs

but the other changes pet windows, cycle targeting, etc that don't benefit players are certainly removed because "classic"

lmao

cherry picking at its core

Razdeline 11-06-2019 10:15 PM

Actually was thinking about this the other day. If links were removed, would prices on items generally go down as a result of the hassle with posting items? Would more conversations between players emerge as a result of no item definitions in the links?

Baler 11-06-2019 10:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Obrae (Post 3016522)
look at the hypocrites apostles of selectively classic :)

Look at the people who want chaos for the staff, spam in EC and to troll anyone who says otherwise. Get down off your high horse.

To any of the classic purists.... Titanium Client.. now back off

Quote:

Originally Posted by Razdeline (Post 3016525)
Actually was thinking about this the other day. If links were removed, would prices on items generally go down as a result of the hassle with posting items?

No, people would just spam the shit out of EC more.
Then people would cry more about text parsers.

---
Cazic H Thule people, open your eyes and quit rolling troll on the forums.

Obrae 11-06-2019 10:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Baler (Post 3016526)
Look at the people who want chaos for the staff, spam in EC and to troll anyone who says otherwise. Get down off your high horse.

To any of the classic purists.... Titanium Client.. now back off


No, people would just spam the shit out of EC more.
Then people would cry more about text parsers.

---
Cazic H Thule people, open your eyes and quit rolling troll on the forums.

i like links, just pointing out you are all hypocrites for attacking selectively classic shit that dont hit you guys.

FungusTrooper 11-06-2019 10:19 PM

half the time i can't tell if baler is a real person

Razdeline 11-06-2019 10:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Baler (Post 3016526)
Look at the people who want chaos for the staff, spam in EC and to troll anyone who says otherwise. Get down off your high horse.


No, people would just spam the shit out of EC more.
Then people would cry more about text parsers.

---
Cazic H Thule people, open your eyes and quit rolling troll on the forums.

Or more use of acronyms. fbss, ssoy, pgt, etc. etc. Which would mean less spam. I'm sure the community would look down on the spam you suggest.

Baler 11-06-2019 10:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FungusTrooper (Post 3016530)
half the time i can't tell if baler is a real person

At least I'm not an uggo daniel!
:p

just a joke

Bazia 11-06-2019 10:28 PM

its not classic if you arent looking into someones bags to see their wares

oldhead 11-07-2019 01:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AgentEpilot (Post 3016477)
I think linking wont ruin the classic feel its nicer to click an item than have tunnel chat stuff spam filled with stats.

Mages having pets on vendors would not hurt it either. Classic is classic tho

oldhead 11-07-2019 01:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by silo32 (Post 3016523)
so its not classic but makes life easier on devs

but the other changes pet windows, cycle targeting, etc that don't benefit players are certainly removed because "classic"

lmao

cherry picking at its core


Selectively classic.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:39 PM.

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.