Project 1999 - GOP Nuclear option - because we need another political thread :D

Project 1999 (/forums/index.php)

- Off Topic (/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=19)

Quote:

Originally Posted by Blitzers (Post 2230566)

You really need to think and stop running your mouth you are really sounding like a moron.

you shut your whore mouth

the darkest timeline is the dankest timeline

HOW DOES THE NUCLEAR OPTION COMPARE TO SCORCHED EARTH?

Quote:

Originally Posted by AzzarTheGod (Post 2230584)

HOW DOES THE NUCLEAR OPTION COMPARE TO SCORCHED EARTH?

Question is should I answer your question when you didn't answer mine ;)

Note: I just called it a "conspiracy theory" in my previous post, which is what I recognized of it when I originally read the article which doesn't actually name names etc. If you understood the nature of the beast, or that of the daily beast (where the article originated from) that may be a tell tale sign it could be satire ...then again it could be true, sometimes the nature of a conspiracy theory. The daily beast is certainly an interesting site.

But I'll afford you your question even though you didn't mine. In both cases they are conspiracy theories, whether or not they are one in the same. Though of course "scorched earth" originated with Beck on his network, which I'm sure he has goon er gone into deep rants how it's impeccably true and will happen and you will all suffer, suffer, suffer.
https://youtu.be/I2Hpo39FivM

I foretold of this several months past.

i know you did but this is more about brainstorming clever names for it than anything substantive.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pokesan (Post 2231474)

i know you did but this is more about brainstorming clever names for it than anything substantive.

Well if you put it that way, historically it's from the playbook as is called the “The Corrupt Bargain” heh. Well the nickname which was given to it.
There is substance, just we need to name names with this, and I mean people involved.
The Corrupt Bargain 2.0

Quote:

More recently, analysis by means of game theory mathematics has proposed that, contrary to the assertions of Jackson, his supporters, and countless historians since, the results of the election were consistent with so-called "sincere voting"—that is, those Members of the House of Representatives who were unable to cast votes for their most-favored candidate apparently voted for their second- (or third-) most-favored candidate.[4] This suggests that the result was not a consequence of any "corrupt bargain" between Adams and Clay, but was instead a natural consequence of an electoral field that was fundamentally divided between those who supported Jackson and those who would support anyone other than Jackson. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corrupt_Bargain

hah! Anyone but Jackson!
That's some pretty strong substance there.

But as it looks like, they are still focused on just taking it to a brokered convention for the possible steal. This might resurface again though, if in fact it wasn't just pure satire, and if Donald doesn't slip a bit in the coming weeks/months removing possibilities of a brokered convention.