Originally Posted by Ciderpress (Post 3672223)

He's also been highly vocal about the unforeseen consequences of cheap AI models, so this is totally consistent. It is, or should be, illegal already to digitally remove somebody's clothes without their consent.

Originally Posted by aussenseiter (Post 3672234)

Wdym?

Originally Posted by Ciderpress (Post 3672233)

There was also a time, long before tweeter, when humans talked and often said untrue things. And then other humans would correct them, and the undecided 3rd parties could observe those interactions and make their own minds up.

Luckily we wised up though and realized that everything is potentially dangerous except for the stuff I like.

Originally Posted by Lune (Post 3672240)

Those unreal things were filtered through institutions such as the journalism profession, as well as early telecommunications, which had robust rules for content.

Originally Posted by Ciderpress (Post 3672235)

Elon, generally, doesn't like the rapid development of narrowly-targeted low level AI, specifically because of this sort of issue. AI can, in theory, make anyone do anything. That's obviously dangerous and warrants serious consideration.

Despite his desire to get a microchip inside your brain.

Originally Posted by aussenseiter (Post 3672263)

Unfortunately, Nitter is broken now too. :(

Originally Posted by Ciderpress (Post 3672223)

Elon had the gall to not ban people unless they break the actual law. He literally bought the entire platform essentially just to make that one change. It should never have come to that, but a bunch of unelected babies decided to play god with how information is disseminated in a free society and he was like um nope to all that. He's also been highly vocal about the unforeseen consequences of cheap AI models, so this is totally consistent. It is, or should be, illegal already to digitally remove somebody's clothes without their consent.