Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
How's it going in that corner you've been backed into? Quote:
Quote:
|
It hurts DSM's soul that mage does 50% more dps than his shaman using his own data so his defense mechanism is just "dps doesn't matter" while simultaneously arguing that shaman does lots of dps so they must be better than mage. The cognitive dissonance is wild.
|
Quote:
The numbers are 25-58%, depending on the situation. The reason why the 58% number is less likely is because the situation in which it happens is pretty unrealistic. Nobody has yet to tell me where this situation would occur at level 60. Basically your group of four level 60s would need to be pulling single mobs non-stop, killing them in 36 seconds each. The group also refuses to let the Shaman go ahead and root/rot. The only two areas I can think of where you would be pulling mobs and killing them in 30 seconds at level 60 would be Sebilis and Spiders in Velks. But in both of those locations the Shaman could go and root/rot so the group can kill more mobs at a time. I am not sure why you think misquoting my posts is helping your case. I am pretty sure it is the other way around. You don't like seeing a Mage deal less DPS than you thought. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
The numbers are 25-58%, depending on the situation. The reason why the 58% number is less likely is because the situation in which it happens is pretty unrealistic. Nobody has yet to tell me where this situation would occur at level 60. Basically your group of four level 60s would need to be pulling single mobs non-stop, killing them in 36 seconds each. The group also refuses to let the Shaman go ahead and root/rot. The only two areas I can think of where you would be pulling mobs and killing them in 30 seconds at level 60 would be Sebilis and Spiders in Velks. But in both of those locations the Shaman could go and root/rot so the group can kill more mobs at a time. You are basically trying to force people to only play in the situation where Mages have a bit more DPS. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
You can't have it both ways. If a group cares about DPS, they will let their group members DPS. If they don't care about DPS, they wouldn't pick a Mage. Either way, the Mage loses. |
How about if they care about dps but don't want some idiot root rotting in their group and just want a class that kills the mobs coming into camp? Cause I'd be willing to bet that's just about everybody that has ever or will ever play everquest.
|
Quote:
If you care about DPS, you would let your group members DPS. If you don't care about DPS, or you have enough DPS, you wouldn't pick a Mage. |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:41 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.