Seems to be lots of irrelevant discussion here. Lets try to get back on track.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Troubled
(Post 1276803)
You don't have to take every single target that is available, every single time. You are getting the lion's share. 12 of 17. 70?ish%. Is my logic flawed or is this right?
|
That's correct, we don't have to get every single target. But we're probably going to try to, and it would be an option if this loophole didn't exist. People quoting numbers and saying how we don't deserve so many mobs, or that the deal already favors us (yes, it OBVIOUSLY favors Class C, just like every plan has, just like they should) are all making strawman arguments. This isn't about what you think we're entitled to, the rotation is already set, and the numbers have already been agreed to. This is about a very specific loophole in a set of rules that were implemented and agreed upon by
Class R , and class R only.
Quote:
Originally Posted by lazcar
(Post 1276808)
No your logic is perfect, tmo/fe/ib that are complaining are just greedy.
|
We're all greedy. But I don't think that trying to make sure you get what you're entitled to in writing, counts as greedy.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Daldaen
(Post 1276907)
1. VP... It's depressing that the strategy on this server 99% of the time is train shit and Zerg down the dragon. Most of the challenge of EQ is meant to come from the environment, in that regard it means the add/trash clears. But alas, 14 years later ain't nobody got time for that.
2. Yea I understand it is "smarter" or rather, you are more likely to get a single kill by going to where your competition isn't. But... Those who were championing the importance of competition went on and on about how fun it is and how without it they wouldn't even want to raid. In the end however they went for the path of least resistance and didn't compete on the open world dragons, disproving their previous arguments.
|
Clearing trash in VP is time consuming and complicated, as you are probably aware by now. It makes zero sense to kill them when you can simply move them and walk past. Class C guilds try to be efficient about most things, and that includes time. But this thread isn't about VP.
We would prefer not to waste the first mob on a repop by going where another top guild is going to be. Watch how competitive the regular spawns will be. But again, this is completely off topic.
Quote:
Originally Posted by lazcar
(Post 1276931)
Why don't you guys... idk... kill the trash? That's classic isn't it?? Killing trash before bosses..
|
See above. Endless spawning wurms, zero reason to, etc. Not to mention there are people who spent countless hours building their dragon faction. I for one would not want to kill a single trash mob in VP.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sarkhan
(Post 1277105)
So C-guilds shared VP due to problems with trains and such but what I do not understand is why they felt the need to go after FFA mobs in the first place instead of heading straight for VP.
If one of those guilds decided to go for VP they could have cleaned some of those dragons without splitting loot while the other two C-guilds were busy killing lesser FFA mobs.
|
Just because there's a new server agreement about sharing mobs doesn't mean the class C guilds aren't going to try to get as many as they can. We leave Class R spawns alone, and the 2 FFA mobs that we were not allowed to attack due to the bag limit. That's how R benefits from this agreement. Class C guilds going to VP first is just terrible for everyone involved. They do not want to go to VP first, as it makes no sense to do so. Is there reason to? Sure, I bet any one of us would have wanted a solo PD kill. But it would mean giving up something else. If one guild went to VP first, probably the others would notice and also be forced to give up world spawn mobs. Luckily for us, that didn't happen.
I wish in general, people would stop discussing what Class C chooses to do with their time on a repop. If you think they collaborate, and for that you think they are hypocrites whatever, it doesn't matter because it's within the rules and that's not what this thread is about. There has been a few intelligent suggestions so far, thank you for those.