Originally Posted by Alarti0001 (Post 907796)

Just because you don't have the mental facilities to discuss something rationally does not mean it can't be rationally discussed.

Originally Posted by kotton05 (Post 907876)

I thought valiant effort, but he said it was for a cr.

Originally Posted by Daldolma (Post 907822)

now it doesn't look like that -- the above is fair. thank you.

the bolded sections are all that was necessary, but in their absence, it looked a lot like tacit approval. i believe you're the first from your guild to explicitly state the above

and your question about rogean seemed to me to be an implication that rogean had no authority to disregard the bet, not a genuine inquiry. i was mistaken

Originally Posted by Frieza_Prexus (Post 907818)

How does it even remotely look like that?

Originally Posted by Alarti0001 (Post 907988)

I broke my word exactly how Mortiiss did.

Originally Posted by Tenlaar (Post 908007)

Way to base your own moral character off of the actions of others.

Alarti, aiming for the lowest common denominator since '09!

Originally Posted by Alarti0001 (Post 907765)

. Thereby insinuating the the bet presenter had foreknowledge. However, foreknowledge does not make a bet invalid.