grinding some giant skeles tonite

[gloinz]

if i get more then 3% xp per kill ill b grinding me some giant skeles

if not im immediately logging off to vote my displeasure towards classic eq solo experience rate

[Tombom]

if i get more then 3% xp per kill ill b grinding me some giant skeles

if not im immediately logging off to vote my displeasure towards classic eq solo experience rate

you are the truest of paladins

[jdklaw]

double xp pretty nice, seeing lvl 45 wiz get 2 blue per quad and lvl 30mage getting half blue per unrest kill

[456]

lol @ those xp rates

[Dullah]

2 blues per quad in 45 is like 1 yellow in a non-hell level.

[Tr0llb0rn]

double xp (triple+ xp at the lower levels) and still its too hard for vile/gloin/the others who could not break lvl 30 in 8 months of the servers existence.

Classic red EQ just not for everyone.

[hagard]

Nothing in everquest is hard - fact

[PhantomRogue]

double xp (triple+ xp at the lower levels) and still its too hard for vile/gloin/the others who could not break lvl 30 in 8 months of the servers existence.

Classic red EQ just not for everyone.

Not everyone wants to play a caster that can solo to 50 bro.

Some people like to play melee's and other classes that rely on a group.

[HarrisonCantBeStopped]

Then group up and grind, like you did in Everquest.

The only thing stopping you, is you.

[hagard]

The only thing stopping people is population 30 0 grps available wait that's not the only thing. . . Long list full of reasons not to play d99

[PhantomRogue]

Then group up and grind, like you did in Everquest.

The only thing stopping you, is you.

And the only thing stopping you is common sense.

Yet another Harrison account to ignore.

[Vile]

no groups no grind.

[Tradesonred]

xp loss in pvp no group

[PhantomRogue]

xp loss in pvp no group

XP loss is negligible at 50.

The only time XP loss hurts is GETTING to 50 because groups are so scarce.

Being a non-solo class on this box is impossible.

[Nirgon]

Certain classes in EQ can't solo, news at 11.