PDA

View Full Version : another solution...


Rushmore
01-04-2012, 08:58 PM
I was given a vision that the server would be instant 50 or really easy to 50 like VZTZ...... but all items were Searyx'ed. Thus forcing you to perma camp most items in the game forever. So we would have pvp! And we wouldn't lose players to having all the gear.

See what I did there?

Nirgon
01-04-2012, 09:01 PM
Very easy to camp things and not get messed with here.

It isn't NEARLY as cut throat as the vztz boxes (no MQ helps you have some peace).

SearyxTZ
01-04-2012, 09:02 PM
I always thought this was the best approach. Not "instant to 50" (or even 2x), but definitely leaning more on itemization over exp grind.

Nirgon
01-04-2012, 09:04 PM
OK, give everyone a race to 50 so they can run in circles while Nizzar screams "help I'm rooted" over and over on vent.

Hm, not sure bro.

Rushmore
01-04-2012, 09:17 PM
we did have a good thing going on in VZTZ minus the hackers and wipes. I love 1999 and thank GOD for it! I just want us to work towards a solution and ultimate victory.

like a finger pointing to the moon........
http://mormonthink.com/img/celestial.jpg

Rikimeru
01-04-2012, 09:33 PM
I was given a vision that the server would be instant 50 or really easy to 50 like VZTZ...... but all items were Searyx'ed. Thus forcing you to perma camp most items in the game forever. So we would have pvp! And we wouldn't lose players to having all the gear.

See what I did there?

lol people are here cause they want a classic type eq experience, not some trashy vztz experience

Filthed
01-04-2012, 09:43 PM
lol people are here cause they want a classic type eq experience, not some trashy vztz experience


/APPLAUSE

SearyxTZ
01-04-2012, 10:55 PM
Well I didn't make this thread, but since it exists I'll give my 2cp:

An itemization treadmill is better for population. If you look at PvE as two halves - itemization and levels - then look at the difference between them. Levels restrict you. A level 10 might be playing by himself with no one to PvP (because he's level 10). Someone with a FBSS can still fight/play with someone without a FBSS. That's the difference, and it's a very big one on a low pop server.

Vile
01-05-2012, 01:34 PM
I dont know about totally Searxy-ing the loot though. A named should always drop at least their common imo.

Chardok was a mindfuck during the Searxy days

Diabalein
01-06-2012, 02:52 PM
lol people are NOT here cause they Don't want a classic type eq experience, They want a friggin PVP Funfest, not some trashy vztz experience

totally fixed that for ya.

SearyxTZ
01-06-2012, 03:11 PM
I dont know about totally Searxy-ing the loot though. A named should always drop at least their common imo.

Chardok was a mindfuck during the Searxy days


Agreed pal.

I actually didn't Searyx any of the Kunark dungeon tables. They just weren't finished, and I was too lazy/busy to comb through them and itemize. Pica did the itemization for almost all of the Kunark zones iirc.

There were two drops that I did curse with my black touch: Skeletal Warlord (tstaff) and Evil Eye (manastone). Both were successful I think, because they were permacamped + pvp hotspots. The drop rate on manastone was ridiculously low for a while and people still camped the shit out of it just because the item was so sought-after.

LizardNecro
01-06-2012, 03:32 PM
What does Searyx-ing the loot mean?