Null, a serious, non-flaming question.

[mimixownzall]

Since the bug forum is for bugs, where do we post about balance issues since you are working on this? Here, or can you talk Rogean on making a special area for this.

[Sniperfire]

translation where can i cry and try to get things changed to benefit me

[mimixownzall]

Considering Null already talked to me in private one night about how some things he wont change unless we can provide proof of a pvp imbalance, then... yeah that is what people are going to do? Though it can be done without crying. Simply laying down facts that are reasonable and not fantastical is not crying.

[Null]

Here is probably fine for now, if it starts getting flooded then we might want to add a new forum for it.

[Cymbal]

k ill say it again

1) I like the way classic was , however i feel it favored casters too much

2) Null your system is actually favoring casters more.

3) IF we divert from classic, id like to see melees get the advantage and NOT casters

[Hovis]

k ill say it again

1) I like the way classic was , however i feel it favored casters too much

2) Null your system is actually favoring casters more.

3) IF we divert from classic, id like to see melees get the advantage and NOT casters

i like this :) -- number 3 especially! lol

also, quick question.. are hybrids going to have a greatly reduced exp gain?

[Sprinkle]

melee are already getting massive resist check advantages and nuke dmg reduction

as it is when melee get geared its roflstomp time , at least casters get to own till then

[Cymbal]

melee are already getting massive resist check advantages and nuke dmg reduction

as it is when melee get geared its roflstomp time , at least casters get to own till then

dude no they arent

nukes land too much for too much dmg

cc lands now too

its not that fun to hahah blind spam and own melees

[Nirgon]

There doesn't need to be balance, there needs to be a classic implementation. Some classes have pvp strengths but pve weaknesses and vice versa. It pans out for every class to be cool and worth it. Yeah, even rangers.

[lindz]

k ill say it again

1) I like the way classic was , however i feel it favored casters too much

2) Null your system is actually favoring casters more.

3) IF we divert from classic, id like to see melees get the advantage and NOT casters

If we start doing balancing, this quickly turns into a custom server and not like the one we remember at all. Yes casters gank easier 1v1, but buffed and bard speeded melee dominate in group pvp. You can't really balance one part of pvp without causing huge imbalance elsewhere. EQ pvp is juts not balanced, I just hope they try to get it as close to original as possible.

[Cymbal]

u guys are missing the point

the fact is they are trying to balance it , they are just going in the wrong direction

my point is either balance it the RIGHT way (favor melee), or leave it alone.

[Sprinkle]

dont matter what they do will be endless cry's here

[Cymbal]

Yes i know u cant please everybody

Im really not crying i just want the server to do well, have a healthy pop, good fights etc

trying to give some unbiased feedback (i will not be playing a melee)

[Sprinkle]

wont have a healthy pop unless they do a few things , such as

remove xp loss on pvp , lol idea by lol ppls

xp bonus on server for downtime

start banning shit talkers ( maybe even me ) And mega dickheads *( me again )

start the server at kunark

velious in 3 months 6 tops

[Doors]

Any idea Sprinkle has can just be instantly ignored.