Global warming. 🥶🥵🤠🤯🥸🥳

[magnetaress]

https://i.imgur.com/or2njRj.png

Will not end all life on earth in the next century.

It will be fucking hilarious for poor ppl tho! 🥲🙃🤣🤭😵😱😈😼🙀🌈🌈🌈

[Ooloo]

If the concern is human contribution to carbon emissions, the earth was way more polluted in the 60s and 70s than it is today, because capitalism enables innovation which allowed internal combustion engines to become much cleaner and more efficient for less money.

The earth is fine, humans are fine, there should be more humans. Climate alarmism paradoxically kills more humans than driving your stupid SUV or whatever.

Oh also electric vehicles are much more likely to get you or somebody else killed in an accident due to their immense weight (because of the huge battery, which requires slave labor mining of rare earth minerals with insanely toxic byproducts to produce in the first place).

[Origen]

If the concern is human contribution to carbon emissions, the earth was way more polluted in the 60s and 70s than it is today, because capitalism enables innovation which allowed internal combustion engines to become much cleaner and more efficient for less money.

The earth is fine, humans are fine, there should be more humans. Climate alarmism paradoxically kills more humans than driving your stupid SUV or whatever.

Oh also electric vehicles are much more likely to get you or somebody else killed in an accident due to their immense weight (because of the huge battery, which requires slave labor mining of rare earth minerals with insanely toxic byproducts to produce in the first place).Youtube Certified

[magnetaress]

If the concern is human contribution to carbon emissions, the earth was way more polluted in the 60s and 70s than it is today, because capitalism enables innovation which allowed internal combustion engines to become much cleaner and more efficient for less money.

The earth is fine, humans are fine, there should be more humans. Climate alarmism paradoxically kills more humans than driving your stupid SUV or whatever.

Oh also electric vehicles are much more likely to get you or somebody else killed in an accident due to their immense weight (because of the huge battery, which requires slave labor mining of rare earth minerals with insanely toxic byproducts to produce in the first place).

Cleaner emissions including unleaded gasoline didn't happen in a vacuum lol.

[Duik]

Globopetro fanboi. Smoking cigarettes is fine, they been improved since the 50's.
Nailed it on the electric car thing though fOoloo. Good work.

You need more faith in the destructive powers of humanity. We can fuck things.
Thorium nuclear is the future.

[Lune]

If the concern is human contribution to carbon emissions, the earth was way more polluted in the 60s and 70s than it is today, because capitalism enables innovation which allowed internal combustion engines to become much cleaner and more efficient for less money.

The earth is fine, humans are fine, there should be more humans. Climate alarmism paradoxically kills more humans than driving your stupid SUV or whatever.

Oh also electric vehicles are much more likely to get you or somebody else killed in an accident due to their immense weight (because of the huge battery, which requires slave labor mining of rare earth minerals with insanely toxic byproducts to produce in the first place).

Whether you believe in climate change or not, there absolutely should not be more humans. Think about how much better our quality of life would be with 1 billion humans on earth instead of 8 billion, how much healthier and more beautiful our ecosystems would be. We're in the kickoff of another mass extinction and it sucks. Especially sucks if you love animals, which I do.

Btw I care more about toxic air pollution than climate gasses and in that realm, fuck internal combustion engines. Living near a road shortens the fuck out of your lifespan. Concern about the climate takes up far more of our zeitgeist than it should, compared to concern about pollution. I believe that may be the point. "Well the planet is probably fucked, but not for 500 years. Oh well, what can I do, and I won't be there /shrug" vs "Less toxic air and ground pollution is going to make it less likely for my children and I to get cancer and/or gynecomastia". Which one allows corporations to pollute more with impunity?

Capitalism is great and all but capitalism is the system bacteria live under. It doesn't give a fuck about the environment and has no answer for protecting the environment. Libertarians thinking tort law is capitalism's answer for environmentalism is hilarious. I wonder how they feel about young people suing corporations about climate change.

[aussenseiter]

Capitalism is great and all but capitalism is the system bacteria live under.

How do you figure? I mean the rest of your post was dumb too, but this is extraordinary.

[Ooloo]

Whether you believe in climate change or not, there absolutely should not be more humans. Think about how much better our quality of life would be with 1 billion humans on earth instead of 8 billion, how much healthier and more beautiful our ecosystems would be. We're in the kickoff of another mass extinction and it sucks. Especially sucks if you love animals, which I do.

Btw I care more about toxic air pollution than climate gasses and in that realm, fuck internal combustion engines. Living near a road shortens the fuck out of your lifespan. Concern about the climate takes up far more of our zeitgeist than it should, compared to concern about pollution. I believe that may be the point. "Well the planet is probably fucked, but not for 500 years. Oh well, what can I do, and I won't be there /shrug" vs "Less toxic air and ground pollution is going to make it less likely for my children and I to get cancer and/or gynecomastia". Which one allows corporations to pollute more with impunity?

Capitalism is great and all but capitalism is the system bacteria live under. It doesn't give a fuck about the environment and has no answer for protecting the environment. Libertarians thinking tort law is capitalism's answer for environmentalism is hilarious. I wonder how they feel about young people suing corporations about climate change.

Oh not this argument, cmon. Okay cool man, there are too many people. We need to go!

But not you, of course.

[Ooloo]

Elon musk is right on this: More human minds existing = greater likelihood one of them will cure cancer or climate change or any other great task we collectively face.

Any other argument is just eugenics on some level

[Lune]

Nobody needs to go, but less people need to be born.

[Ooloo]

Nobody needs to go, but less people need to be born.

Total bullshit. Why? Explain why.

[Trexller]

no, Lune is correct

to say, "oh everyone but you" is childish, and reflects great immaturity, this is not a statement of individuals but the population as a whole, there is no favoritism, this is indifference.

anyone who doesn't recognize the overpopulation issue, is not mentally addressing it in scale to the planet. Elon Musk fails to understand, not by lack of ability but personal refusal. might be like the only thing I disagree with him on. Musk is also one of the only legit capitalists (meaning, you earn money by simply having alot of money), and population growth is directly commensurate with economic growth.

a guy like Musk looks at the world and sees populations dropping globally, to him that means less income.

if you allow yourself to address population concerns on the scale at which they occur, a real problem arises that is not any more difficult to understand than arithmetic. Every living being requires X amount of land to produce their food, their energy, and whatever else they want from the planet. Land space is finite, regardless of how efficiently that you use it.

Forget fossil fuels, imagine 8 billion people burning wood for their primary source of heat and mechanical energy. All trees would have been gone decades ago, which would have led to ecosystem collapse.

There are going to be many different estimates of what is the X amount of land required for each human, and everyone will lose the point splitting hairs over the X value, at which point they all forgot what started the debate, which ironically was about there being too many people on earth.

[aussenseiter]

no, Lune is correct

to say, "oh everyone but you" is childish, and reflects great immaturity, this is not a statement of individuals but the population as a whole, there is no favoritism, this is indifference.

anyone who doesn't recognize the overpopulation issue, is not mentally addressing it in scale to the planet. Elon Musk fails to understand, not by lack of ability but personal refusal. might be like the only thing I disagree with him on. Musk is also one of the only legit capitalists (meaning, you earn money by simply having alot of money), and population growth is directly commensurate with economic growth.

a guy like Musk looks at the world and sees populations dropping globally, to him that means less income.

if you allow yourself to address population concerns on the scale at which they occur, a real problem arises that is not any more difficult to understand than arithmetic. Every living being requires X amount of land to produce their food, their energy, and whatever else they want from the planet. Land space is finite, regardless of how efficiently that you use it.

Forget fossil fuels, imagine 8 billion people burning wood for their primary source of heat and mechanical energy. All trees would have been gone decades ago, which would have led to ecosystem collapse.

There are going to be many different estimates of what is the X amount of land required for each human, and everyone will lose the point splitting hairs over the X value, at which point they all forgot what started the debate, which ironically was about there being too many people on earth.

Malthusians r ghey

[Lune]

I did. There are too many people for the space and resources available on the planet. The industry and agriculture involved with feeding and clothing 8 billion people is polluting the fuck out of everything. Plant and animal life are devastated, which I'm sure you give a fuck about.

Yea, the more people we have the more talented folk will innovate, that's great. But 2 billion well taken care of people with more than twice the space and resources available to them is probably going to work better than 8 billion people where half of them are getting ground into the dirt. Most of the innovation already comes from an extreme minority of the planet anyway.

Nevermind the simple quality of a life not lived in an overcrowded fucking shithole.

[aussenseiter]

I did. There are too many people for the space and resources available on the planet. The industry and agriculture involved with feeding and clothing 8 billion people is polluting the fuck out of everything. Plant and animal life are devastated, which I'm sure you give a fuck about.

Yea, the more people we have the more talented folk will innovate, that's great. But 2 billion well taken care of people with more than twice the space and resources available to them is probably going to work better than 8 billion people where half of them are getting ground into the dirt. Most of the innovation already comes from an extreme minority of the planet anyway.

Nevermind the simple quality of a life not lived in an overcrowded fucking shithole.

2 billion people with 6 billion slaves would be better cared for than 2 billion people with 750 million slaves.

[Lune]

You see in order for my point to resonate you have to give a fuck about plant and animal life, and if that's not the case, I earnestly could not give less of a fuck about your point of view.

That includes humans being happy and healthy and not just drivers of growth and innovation.

[aussenseiter]

You see in order for my point to resonate you have to give a fuck about plant and animal life, and if that's not the case, I earnestly could not give less of a fuck about your point of view.

You know they're food, right?

[magnetaress]

Concern about the climate takes up far more of our zeitgeist than it should.

Absolutely agree with you lune no snark..

I do get a huge chuckle about cool pictures of dual big tropical storm systems tho :p

no, Lune is correct

to say, "oh everyone but you" is childish, and reflects great immaturity, this is not a statement of individuals but the population as a whole, there is no favoritism, this is indifference.

anyone who doesn't recognize the overpopulation issue, is not mentally addressing it in scale to the planet. Elon Musk fails to understand, not by lack of ability but personal refusal. might be like the only thing I disagree with him on. Musk is also one of the only legit capitalists (meaning, you earn money by simply having alot of money), and population growth is directly commensurate with economic growth.

a guy like Musk looks at the world and sees populations dropping globally, to him that means less income.

if you allow yourself to address population concerns on the scale at which they occur, a real problem arises that is not any more difficult to understand than arithmetic. Every living being requires X amount of land to produce their food, their energy, and whatever else they want from the planet. Land space is finite, regardless of how efficiently that you use it.

Forget fossil fuels, imagine 8 billion people burning wood for their primary source of heat and mechanical energy. All trees would have been gone decades ago, which would have led to ecosystem collapse.

There are going to be many different estimates of what is the X amount of land required for each human, and everyone will lose the point splitting hairs over the X value, at which point they all forgot what started the debate, which ironically was about there being too many people on earth.

What people like musk fail to see (because they don't see it being a problem for themselves perhaps so just don't think in terms like you said) is that for the earth to host 1 person per square 10ft or 100ft or whatever (that would be a lot more ppl than we have r now) quality of life collectively would have to go down for everyone (including musk). So therefore --- and I agree with Lune on this one too.

To have a good quality of life for everyone, we need more land per person and more space per person than we currently do. We already cannot efficiently manage land. Industrialization helped a little bit (this is where Musk is coming from, trading an early grave/starvation/predation/freezing to death for abundent canned and processed food with a shelf life if 1000 years was good for a lot of peasents with no sanitation or metal /materials/ mined mountains of gypsum to make stuff out of).


Anyways.

I can't wait for the Sahara to be a tropical paradise again in this way I am rooting FOR climate change.

You know they're food, right?

POV: Soylent green, touche! (CHarlten Heston was also cute in that and he didn't even need to kiss a black woman (snark not racism you FOOLS (I'm pro the kiss in ::::The Omega Man::::)).

[Lune]

I can't wait for the Sahara to be a tropical paradise again in this way I am rooting FOR climate change.

I mean Earth got along just fine in the carboniferous era when it was a million degrees, you had jungles at northern latitudes, and there were dragonflies the size of your torso flying around. I could go for that

[Trexller]

You see in order for my point to resonate you have to give a fuck about plant and animal life, and if that's not the case, I earnestly could not give less of a fuck about your point of view.

some folks have alot of trouble comprehending concepts of massive scale. nothing in their lives can remotely compare to global type things. I may have an advantage working for a water utility, which itself is a massive concept, yet alot smaller than anything global. I can see the effort required to put running water in every man-made structure, which in simple terms is basically a miracle that it functions as well as it does.

people might hear in the news about a city having some nasty chemical in their water, and think to themself of thats a tragedy, i'm sitting here thinking, "it's a miracle that this doesn't happen more often"

take that understood concept of running water in millions of buildings and apply that to any other resource, and you can pretty easily start to understand that this planet-sized machine humans have built to maintain their existence, has trillions of moving parts which all must function, cannot last forever, and is a miracle it has survived just decades.

young people aren't having kids, that means the elderly will rapidly out number the young. Kids are a huge economic driver, young people with no kids spend less, meaning that they also earn less. People who need more money, usually end up earning more of it. If they aren't earning money, then they aren't paying taxes, they aren't investing, they aren't spending. We go back to the start with population growth being economic growth, population shrink means economic shrink.

Less money going into the pool, means less spent to maintain the infrastructure of any resource. Less maintence means a less functional infrastructure.

this isn't a jab at capitalism, it's just a reality-based assessment by a qualified analyst. (I do believe that anything required for survival should be provided by the government, and also available in the private sector for those who choose, but that's another topic)

[magnetaress]

Everything happens in cycles we are natures great big C02 exhale, once we are done and transition into big bug eyed grey aliens that probably have tech that loves C02 things will return to the way they where before, this is on a few million years timescale. In 100 million years we'll barely be noticed anymore.

some folks have alot of trouble comprehending concepts of massive scale. nothing in their lives can remotely compare to global type things. I may have an advantage working for a water utility, which itself is a massive concept, yet alot smaller than anything global. I can see the effort required to put running water in every man-made structure, which in simple terms is basically a miracle that it functions as well as it does.

people might hear in the news about a city having some nasty chemical in their water, and think to themself of thats a tragedy, i'm sitting here thinking, "it's a miracle that this doesn't happen more often"

take that understood concept of running water in millions of buildings and apply that to any other resource, and you can pretty easily start to understand that this planet-sized machine humans have built to maintain their existence, has trillions of moving parts which all must function, cannot last forever, and is a miracle it has survived just decades.

young people aren't having kids, that means the elderly will rapidly out number the young. Kids are a huge economic driver, young people with no kids spend less, meaning that they also earn less. People who need more money, usually end up earning more of it. If they aren't earning money, then they aren't paying taxes, they aren't investing, they aren't spending. We go back to the start with population growth being economic growth, population shrink means economic shrink.

Less money going into the pool, means less spent to maintain the infrastructure of any resource. Less maintence means a less functional infrastructure.

this isn't a jab at capitalism, it's just a reality-based assessment by a qualified analyst. (I do believe that anything required for survival should be provided by the government, and also available in the private sector for those who choose, but that's another topic)

oh no this is a great post AAA+ quality comin from u trexller couldn't say it better myself it is a MIRACLE

Musk is totally hoping we make more ppl to find more innovative ways of clanking the machine back toghether so to speak helper nanobots for the body of civilization, butt old ppl aren't going to do that unless u brainbot them.

I've already addressed the pathos and folly of immortality in numerious other threds tho :p + Jibartik did a much better job of it last year !

[aussenseiter]

some folks have alot of trouble comprehending concepts of massive scale. nothing in their lives can remotely compare to global type things. I may have an advantage working for a water utility, which itself is a massive concept, yet alot smaller than anything global. I can see the effort required to put running water in every man-made structure, which in simple terms is basically a miracle that it functions as well as it does.

people might hear in the news about a city having some nasty chemical in their water, and think to themself of thats a tragedy, i'm sitting here thinking, "it's a miracle that this doesn't happen more often"

take that understood concept of running water in millions of buildings and apply that to any other resource, and you can pretty easily start to understand that this planet-sized machine humans have built to maintain their existence, has trillions of moving parts which all must function, cannot last forever, and is a miracle it has survived just decades.

young people aren't having kids, that means the elderly will rapidly out number the young. Kids are a huge economic driver, young people with no kids spend less, meaning that they also earn less. People who need more money, usually end up earning more of it. If they aren't earning money, then they aren't paying taxes, they aren't investing, they aren't spending. We go back to the start with population growth being economic growth, population shrink means economic shrink.

Less money going into the pool, means less spent to maintain the infrastructure of any resource. Less maintence means a less functional infrastructure.

this isn't a jab at capitalism, it's just a reality-based assessment by a qualified analyst. (I do believe that anything required for survival should be provided by the government, and also available in the private sector for those who choose, but that's another topic)

Public water is a market intervention. A necessary and proper intervention, of course.

But private could deliver it much cheaper.

[Evia]

You see in order for my point to resonate you have to give a fuck about plant and animal life, and if that's not the case, I earnestly could not give less of a fuck about your point of view.

That includes humans being happy and healthy and not just drivers of growth and innovation.

Do you eat animals?
I don’t care if you do. But it’s annoying hearing how much people love animals and yet eat them. Especially if they’re preaching.

I haven’t eaten an animal in over 18 years because I love animals
…and the idea of eating a corpse is repulsive.
But if you’re anything less than a vegan/vegetarian and you’re soap boxing about your love for animals and the planet, you might wanna self reflect a bit…. Or utilize different argument points that you don’t directly contradict.

[unsunghero]

I have so many vegetarian/vegan memes but I’ll refrain from posting ;)

[Nibblewitz]

Greta Thunberg was awarded an honorary doctorate in theology.

[Trexller]

Public water is a market intervention. A necessary and proper intervention, of course.

But private could deliver it much cheaper.

true... but you can't allow something that is more or less required for survival to be controlled by such a few people.

like back in the 1800s some bigwig titans built nationwide railroad and telegraph/phone lines.

then, they turned to the US Gov't and said, "We own all of the railroads and phone lines, so now you're going to do what we say, because you can't do anything about it"

Zuckerberg and Bezos can only dream of the influence held by the rail and telecom barons.

since then the gov't has been cagey about allowing any small group to control vast resources. It's a matter of national security.

like when you shop around for an electricity supplier, you aren't shopping which product you are going to buy, you're shopping who you're going to give your money to, but this manner of privatization hasn't really changed anything, except for opening investment markets to the utilities which at the end of the day, is a good thing as it naturally stabilizes prices and opens more avenues for the gov't to shave off pieces of the money stream, which is necessary to maintain the infrastructure.

the power company in cali and hawaii for example meet their investor's demands on customer payments, gov't subsidies and other minor sources, and that's just to get by - to survive, then they don't have jack to update their infrastructure then power lines get damaged and start wildfires

the real tragedy here is that people act surprised that national resource infrastructure is in such a state of disrepair, frankly it's a miracle that it all hasn't fallen apart already.

buy seeds and mason jars, you're all gonna need to learn to can foods within your lifetime.

[Nibblewitz]

Utility providers are the best example of natural monopolies. Some states already impose monopolistic control of their grids.

[Trexller]

Utility providers are the best example of natural monopolies. Some states already impose monopolistic control of their grids.

it's impossible to avoid when there is only a single product for sale on a market, this is why they are "public utilities" - no private entity can be allowed to control them. This is 'necessary socialism' - or 'socialism for national security', lol that's how they should sell socialism to the conservatives.

will add, even the states with single supplier utilities have alot of regulation of what can or can't be done, how or why etc.

so it's still a company or multiple all working underneath the gov't authority, in theory anyway.

they take their 'profits' that they were allowed to earn in providing the utility, then they don't reinvest into their means of production and conveyance and Maui catches fire.

or the water lines under roads collapse, I know of a few places in my area where there are STILL wooden water lines that were installed 100+ years ago

nobody wants to pay to replace them, not even the customers who claim to be concerned with the quality of their water

[Elizondo]

Global Warming ...

lawl

Another Hoax from the Kool-Aid drinkers

[unsunghero]

Global Warming ...

lawl

Another Hoax from the Kool-Aid drinkers

Jordan Peterson is losing his license to practice (not that he does anymore anyway, he doesn’t need to) Psychology in Canada due to posting negatively about climate alarmism

What climate has to do with psychology is beyond me, but I’m sure it’s also his rebuttals of gender theory and generally not liking Dear Leader for Life Trudeau

[Lune]

Do you eat animals?
I don’t care if you do. But it’s annoying hearing how much people love animals and yet eat them. Especially if they’re preaching.

I haven’t eaten an animal in over 18 years because I love animals
…and the idea of eating a corpse is repulsive.
But if you’re anything less than a vegan/vegetarian and you’re soap boxing about your love for animals and the planet, you might wanna self reflect a bit…. Or utilize different argument points that you don’t directly contradict.

You can love animals and eat them. Humanely raised livestock that has spent life in a pasture before being humanely slaughtered is arguably a kinder paradigm than the natural order of things, where the animal is being strangled and ripped apart. Industrialized animal products are immoral no matter how you look at it. You can't even feed meat to 4 billion people without industrializing it, much less 8 billion, btw

I mainly eat seafood. I don't claim to be a perfect person, but I brought this up primarily because you can't argue the population should be 8 billion or above, and also care about the complete massacre of all animal life that is being perpetrated.

[aussenseiter]

You can love animals and eat them. Humanely raised livestock that has spent life in a pasture before being humanely slaughtered is arguably a kinder paradigm than the natural order of things, where the animal is being strangled and ripped apart. Industrialized animal products are immoral no matter how you look at it. You can't even feed meat to 4 billion people without industrializing it, much less 8 billion, btw

I mainly eat seafood. I don't claim to be a perfect person, but you can't argue the population should be 8 billion or above, and also care about the complete massacre of all animal life that is being perpetrated.

Thoughts and prayers for your dinner.

[Elizondo]

Jordan Peterson is losing his license to practice (not that he does anymore anyway, he doesn’t need to) Psychology in Canada due to posting negatively about climate alarmism

What climate has to do with psychology is beyond me, but I’m sure it’s also his rebuttals of gender theory and generally not liking Dear Leader for Life Trudeau

The Left is spiraling into Fascism and Totalitarianism

[Trexller]

The Left is spiraling into Fascism and Totalitarianism

They always do. It amuses me how so few people understand this.

https://ids.si.edu/ids/deliveryService?id=NMAH-2004-19156-11&max=1000
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/a/a9/Flag_of_the_Soviet_Union.svg/800px-Flag_of_the_Soviet_Union.svg.png

[Lune]

You know those two were mortal enemies right? Bold claim that anyone could be both

https://i.imgur.com/gAfVoiQ.png

There now we got all the evil on one page

[aussenseiter]

You know those two were mortal enemies right? Bold claim that anyone could be both

https://i.imgur.com/gAfVoiQ.png

There now we got all the evil on one page

Gamon aren't evil. They're stupid.

[unsunghero]

The Left is spiraling into Fascism and Totalitarianism

Ya, here the most common reasons to lose someone’s license to practice are 1. Selling your clients something not involved with their treatment aka exploiting them financially or 2. Having sex with your client

Those were the big ones. The entire system of oversight was put in place to protect the person’s clients

Soon it will be “posting stuff online the current government doesn’t like”

[Trexller]

You know those two were mortal enemies right? Bold claim that anyone could be both

nah they only became enemies after Hitler betrayed the pact w/ Stalin and invaded russia. Before that they were happy enough just being neighbors who didn't agree on things.

the Nazi's would have won if they didn't have to fight the soviet steamroller. the US loves to be all like, oh you'd speak german if it weren't for us in WW2, the reality was that the Nazi's were so far ahead technologically, that if they didn't have to spend their vast resources across an area as large as russia, then they would have had enough to push to North America.

without the endless hordes of russian peasants to eat up their ammo, nobody could have hoped to buy the time to develop the technology required to fight the Nazis, leaving the Nazis with the time and resources to develop the atomic bomb that since it's use has defined all major conflicts to this day.

The brits wouldn't have cracked engima, the Allies couldn't have invaded italy or france, and the Nazis would have had the resources of the soviet union at their friendly disposal, rather than having to face them on the battlefield.

Hitler ultimately defeated Hitler

[Lune]

nah they only became enemies after Hitler betrayed the pact w/ Stalin and invaded russia. Before that they were happy enough just being neighbors who didn't agree on things.

the Nazi's would have won if they didn't have to fight the soviet steamroller. the US loves to be all like, oh you'd speak german if it weren't for us in WW2, the reality was that the Nazi's were so far ahead technologically, that if they didn't have to spend their vast resources across an area as large as russia, then they would have had enough to push to North America.

without the endless hordes of russian peasants to eat up their ammo, nobody could have hoped to buy the time to develop the technology required to fight the Nazis, leaving the Nazis with the time and resources to develop the atomic bomb that since it's use has defined all major conflicts to this day.

The brits wouldn't have cracked engima, the Allies couldn't have invaded italy or france, and the Nazis would have had the resources of the soviet union at their friendly disposal, rather than having to face them on the battlefield.

Hitler ultimately defeated Hitler

They both considered each other existential threats to their way of life and had complete and utter contempt for one another. The Molotov Ribbentrop Pact was for convenience as both had an interest in delaying a war each knew was inevitable. Beyond that, they had just fought in WWI and the Nazis knew they were going to get double penetrated again. The Nazis exterminated millions of Soviet prisoners and the Soviets did the same thing back, though they didn't catch as many Nazis.

But yea you're right that WW2 was mainly won by the Soviets and it's irritating how much credit the West takes for ending that war

[Trexller]

I think they would have learned to coexist, one with all of west europe and one with all of east

say the Nazi's didn't bail on OP Seal Lion and invaded britain, now they have control of the atlantic from africa to norway.

Immediately the Nazi's would have been like, "shite, we need alot more coal and iron than we did before"

Stalin would show up and say, "Here's millions of tons of coal and iron in exchange for thousands of tons of gold bullion"

then the ideological differences take a back seat to the economic cooperation making everyone rich.

We should all be thanking methamphetamine really. They were all blitzed on speed during the war. Imagine a clear headed, shrewd and calculated Nazi high command.

[Elizondo]

You know those two were mortal enemies right? Bold claim that anyone could be both

https://i.imgur.com/gAfVoiQ.png

There now we got all the evil on one page

Both competing for Left Wing supremacy

Same Tree. Different branches.

HTH

[Elizondo]

gJbOqLrb6gQ

[Trexller]

This is an implementation problem, not a concept problem

there is no human future in fossil fuels. if you believe me when I rant about libtards, then believe me on that.

Electric vehicles absolutely are the future, but lithium and the current means of electricity conveyance are not sustainable.

Tree huggers got ignored for half a century, then they gained recognition overnight, and are currently trying to walk before they learn to crawl.

[aussenseiter]

They both considered each other existential threats to their way of life and had complete and utter contempt for one another. The Molotov Ribbentrop Pact was for convenience as both had an interest in delaying a war each knew was inevitable. Beyond that, they had just fought in WWI and the Nazis knew they were going to get double penetrated again. The Nazis exterminated millions of Soviet prisoners and the Soviets did the same thing back, though they didn't catch as many Nazis.

But yea you're right that WW2 was mainly won by the Soviets and it's irritating how much credit the West takes for ending that war

Lay off Zinn's cock he's a Jew half of it is gone.

[Duik]

TrannySoreArse Trexller says:

lithium and the current means of electricity conveyance

they gained recognition overnight, and are currently

Nice.

[Origen]

Jordan Peterson is losing his license to practice (not that he does anymore anyway, he doesn’t need to) Psychology in Canada due to posting negatively about climate alarmism

What climate has to do with psychology is beyond me, but I’m sure it’s also his rebuttals of gender theory and generally not liking Dear Leader for Life TrudeauI didn't know that, that's awesome and I hope more people like him get deplatformed.

Hell, I hope they take his house

[Landroval]

Think about how much better our quality of life would be with 1 billion humans on earth instead of 8 billion, how much healthier and more beautiful our ecosystems would be.

I'm thinking about how much better my quality of life would be if 87.5% of you were dead. Communism is the way!

[Origen]

Climate change can be laid at the feet of the capitalists, they've killed more than the communists could ever kill and will continue killing more

[magnetaress]

Communism under g-d and of the ten commandments == a win.

Capitalism of the same under G-d and of the ten commandments would be too HOWEVER (however is a word that means super biggggg butttts) I have yet to believe personally such a thing is possible !

[Landroval]

Communism under g-d and of the ten commandments == a win.

The Essenian tradition? Gotta do away with meat consumption too then. The technological advancement in schmeat ain't too bad when I do my annual Lent fast. Could easily do it all year, but I'm still gonna drink 100% grass fed organic milk, damnit...and cheese...and butter. Happy dairy, from happy cows, and I'm still gonna slaughter a lamb and eat it on Easter, and a turkey on Thanksgiving, and a big roast on Christmas.

They should be reducing the price of schmeat to be cheaper than actual meat btw. At the current price points for meat alternatives; it's just straight up price gouging.

Anyhow, I don't have faith in most of the rest of y'all in meeting this aim, as the information and positive benefit of making these dietary changes has fallen on deaf ears amongst our resident fats.

[magnetaress]

The Essenian tradition? Gotta do away with meat consumption too then. The technological advancement in schmeat ain't too bad when I do my annual Lent fast. Could easily do it all year, but I'm still gonna drink 100% grass fed organic milk, damnit...and cheese...and butter. Happy dairy, from happy cows.

They should be reducing the price of schmeat to be cheaper than actual meat btw. At the current price points for meat alternatives; it's just straight up price gouging.

The pamphlets I get from Jehovah's witnessii say that meat is bad too lol.

[Landroval]

The pamphlets I get from Jehovah's witnessii say that meat is bad too lol.

Christian vegetarianism was requisite for the early faith, from what I've read although the modern bible details Christ eating fish at the end of the book of John, whereas in Luke he eats Matzah only after the resurrection.

[magnetaress]

Adventists too ! although they have relaxed a lot on the topic

I love Matzah :) i eat a lot of it !

[Landroval]

Adventists too ! although they have relaxed a lot on the topic

I love Matzah :) i eat a lot of it !

Almost the same as a saltine. Makes you wonder if baking powder is a kosher workaround to prohibition on yeast, since it's not a living animal, and how could the early Christian, Israelite or Edomite know about baking powder when chemists developed it's use as a leavening agent in 1856.

[magnetaress]

I think having it not leavened helps with when my guts are really grumpy.

Eating too much levened stuff == le bad.

[Landroval]

Last meal of Lent is Matzah on Thursday before sundown, then fast to Easter, btw

[magnetaress]

https://coastalanglermag.com/hurricanes-affect-waters-fish/#:~:text=When%20a%20hurricane%20comes%20by,salty%2 0than%20it%20previously%20was.

Woa... neat stuff I just learned. Happens quite often... the ocean is a fickle mistress.

[Jimjam]

You can love animals and eat them. Humanely raised livestock that has spent life in a pasture before being humanely slaughtered is arguably a kinder paradigm than the natural order of things, where the animal is being strangled and ripped apart. Industrialized animal products are immoral no matter how you look at it. You can't even feed meat to 4 billion people without industrializing it, much less 8 billion, btw

I mainly eat seafood. I don't claim to be a perfect person, but I brought this up primarily because you can't argue the population should be 8 billion or above, and also care about the complete massacre of all animal life that is being perpetrated.

I mean i love trees, flowers and plants. Doesn’t mean I won’t eat them.

[magnetaress]

I love the trees and flowers quite a bit more than the meaty bits and wierd smelly creatures that live in them so, IMO fair game for those.

I don't like meat factories tho. No flowers there !

[Homesteaded]

Globopetro fanboi. Smoking cigarettes is fine, they been improved since the 50's.
Nailed it on the electric car thing though fOoloo. Good work.

You need more faith in the destructive powers of humanity. We can fuck things.
Thorium nuclear is the future.

I won’t be surprised if we find out in 20 years that smoking isn’t even that bad for us. My buddies and I pick up smoking cigs for our week long camping trip into the woods. Smoking is a great past time and the globo homo crowd ruined it, as they are inclined to do. Ruin everything good and decent.

[Evia]

You can love animals and eat them. Humanely raised livestock that has spent life in a pasture before being humanely slaughtered is arguably a kinder paradigm than the natural order of things, where the animal is being strangled and ripped apart. Industrialized animal products are immoral no matter how you look at it. You can't even feed meat to 4 billion people without industrializing it, much less 8 billion, btw

I mainly eat seafood. I don't claim to be a perfect person, but I brought this up primarily because you can't argue the population should be 8 billion or above, and also care about the complete massacre of all animal life that is being perpetrated.

idk if i'd argue that you love animals then. it seems to me you love the planet and that is your driving motivation.

like I said I don't care if you do or don't eat animals or if you love them or dont. I just found it to be a bit of a hypocrisy to call out others for not caring about animals while you munch on your 'humanely slaughtered' burger. if you're gonna PREACH at least practice what you do.

[Ripp]

Muh sciences! Sheeple.

https://i0.wp.com/longreads.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/newsweek20cooling.jpg?w=852&ssl=1

[aussenseiter]

idk if i'd argue that you love animals then. it seems to me you love the planet and that is your driving motivation.

like I said I don't care if you do or don't eat animals or if you love them or dont. I just found it to be a bit of a hypocrisy to call out others for not caring about animals while you munch on your 'humanely slaughtered' burger. if you're gonna PREACH at least practice what you do.

Most cows wouldn't get to live at all if it wasn't for us bloodmouths planning to eventually devour them.

[Duik]

People eating animals for sustainance is ok.
People killing environment for profit thereby killing the animals that rely on said environment IS NOT OK.
How is this concept difficult to comprehend?
Lions eat antelope. Lions are animals.
People eat sheep/cows/camels/pigs/fish/whatever. Humans are also animals. Deal with it.

I dont want fish shitting in my ocean. Surfers pay me to tour the CLEAN ocean. So i blow up fish with a bomb and let them just float around not shitting. Not ok. But i need to make money! Money impoortant. Need money.

Catching 50 fish to eat AND sell some for money IS OK. I can still respect the other fish and eat their cousins. And the ocean in general.

[Ripp]

Dance Sheeple! DANCE!

http://www.rense.com/1.imagesH/climatology_dees.jpg

[Duik]

Listen. Everyrhing is usually somewhere in the middle. Somewhere between WORLD ABOUT TO END and DONT EAT ANIMALS YOU HYPOCRITICAL BASTARDS CLIMATE CHANGE AINT REAL DUMB BITCHES.

[Ripp]

Listen. Everyrhing is usually somewhere in the middle. Somewhere between WORLD ABOUT TO END and DONT EAT ANIMALS YOU HYPOCRITICAL BASTARDS CLIMATE CHANGE AINT REAL DUMB BITCHES.

First it was Global Cooling. Now it's called Global Warming. In 10-20 years it will be Global Cooling again.

It's called WEATHER!

Hello Sheeple?! HELLO?!

https://media.giphy.com/media/gEvab1ilmJjA82FaSV/giphy.gif

[Ripp]

Climate activists invest in property on beaches they say are disappearing (https://news.yahoo.com/climate-activists-invest-property-beaches-110000244.html)

From Bill and Melinda Gates to climate envoy John Kerry, climate activists have sounded the alarm about how melting ice will soon raise the ocean to levels that swallow the world’s beaches.

But some of the country's most vocal climate change activists have invested heavily in luxury oceanfront property along beaches they’ve claimed will be underwater one day due to rising sea levels.

https://media.giphy.com/media/3Z1fJKVyqPXbHacR0O/giphy.gif

[Lune]

I won’t be surprised if we find out in 20 years that smoking isn’t even that bad for us. My buddies and I pick up smoking cigs for our week long camping trip into the woods. Smoking is a great past time and the globo homo crowd ruined it, as they are inclined to do. Ruin everything good and decent.

I mean, they're gonna help you meet God sooner. Win win

It's not super terrible here and there, the hard part is it's super addictive.

idk if i'd argue that you love animals then. it seems to me you love the planet and that is your driving motivation.

like I said I don't care if you do or don't eat animals or if you love them or dont. I just found it to be a bit of a hypocrisy to call out others for not caring about animals while you munch on your 'humanely slaughtered' burger. if you're gonna PREACH at least practice what you do.

You may disagree that one can love animals and eat them, but either way it's beside the issue. 8 billion humans and their livestock, agriculture, and industry are resulting in the mass extermination of plant and animal life on a scale not seen since a huge chunk of space rock slammed into Chicxulub and killed almost everything. If you love animals, you should care about that, regardless of your other qualities.

Furthermore, if American fundies aren't going to practice what they preach, why the fuck should I.

[Ripp]

https://i.imgur.com/or2njRj.png

Will not end all life on earth in the next century.

It will be fucking hilarious for poor ppl tho! 🥲🙃🤣🤭😵😱😈😼🙀🌈🌈🌈

Oh look! Weather!

https://media.giphy.com/media/13aSSyJaI5NkTm/giphy.gif

[Ooloo]

8 billion humans and their livestock, agriculture, and industry are resulting in the mass extermination of plant and animal life on a scale not seen since a huge chunk of space rock slammed into Chicxulub and killed almost everything.

This is not even remotely true. Millions of species have arisen and gone extinct in the years between the chicxulub impact and homo sapiens.

Human activity has resulted not only in billions of humans existing who otherwise wouldn't have been able to, but also the artificial preservation of species like the stupid panda who would have naturally gone extinct long ago. We can barely even keep them alive in captivity.

Humans are part of nature. Climate alarmists hold yet another conspicuously religious view that humans are somehow special and different than the rest of nature. Guess who else thinks that? Conservative christians. Uh oh!

[Ripp]

1975 - Global Cooling is going to kill us! We need more livestock and poop!

2023 - Global Warming is going to kill us! We need to kill all the livestock!

https://media.giphy.com/media/l0MYKL1o9yKYbA2Xu/giphy.gif

[Lune]

This is not even remotely true. Millions of species have arisen and gone extinct in the years between the chicxulub impact and homo sapiens.

Human activity has resulted not only in billions of humans existing who otherwise wouldn't have been able to, but also the artificial preservation of species like the stupid panda who would have naturally gone extinct long ago. We can barely even keep them alive in captivity.

Humans are part of nature. Climate alarmists hold yet another conspicuously religious view that humans are somehow special and different than the rest of nature. Guess who else thinks that? Conservative christians. Uh oh!

Read about the Holocene Extinction. The current rate of extinction far surpasses the normal background rate.

There is no reason we need more than 8 billion humans. It benefits nobody, not even humans. Just less space and resources for everyone. Nevermind that ecosystem collapse has implications for our happiness, survival, and prosperity.

Saying humans are a part of nature, while technically true, glosses over the important truth that unlike every other species, we are self-aware and capable of knowing better. We can choose to manage our own population and not breed like a bunch of fucking bacteria.

[unsunghero]

“Human beings are a plague”

[aussenseiter]

Read about the Holocene Extinction. The current rate of extinction far surpasses the normal background rate.

There is no reason we need more than 8 billion humans. It benefits nobody, not even humans. Just less space and resources for everyone. Nevermind that ecosystem collapse has implications for our happiness, survival, and prosperity.

Saying humans are a part of nature, while technically true, glosses over the important truth that unlike every other species, we are self-aware and capable of knowing better. We can choose to manage our own population and not breed like a bunch of fucking bacteria.

Least eugenicist poster

[Elizondo]

Climate Cultists are so dumb and naive

Been falling for fake data for decades now

Hilarious

[Ripp]

Climate Cultists: "There are too many people on the planet! We must get rid of some!"

Normal Person: "Why don't you volunteer to go first?"

Climate Cultists:

https://media.giphy.com/media/YVPwi7L2izTJS/giphy.gif

[Elizondo]

Climate Cultists: "There are too many people on the planet! We must get rid of some!"

Normal Person: "Why don't you volunteer to go first?"

Climate Cultists:

https://media.giphy.com/media/YVPwi7L2izTJS/giphy.gif

What's hilarious is that the vast majority of these climate cultists are unemployed like Rob and contribute absolutely nothing to society

Totally worthless losers

[Ripp]

What's hilarious is that the vast majority of these climate cultists are unemployed like Rob and contribute absolutely nothing to society

Totally worthless losers

They're completely brainwashed non-thinkers. They just can't put two and two together. It's embarrassing.

https://media.giphy.com/media/XsUtdIeJ0MWMo/giphy.gif

[Lune]

We'll drag you kicking and screaming into the next century like we always do. You're welcome.

Hope this helps

“Human beings are a plague”

It's precisely because of my humanism that I want less humans :)

It's moot anyway because there is no good way to govern whether people have kids or how many. People are gonna do what they're gonna do and that is their right. Best thing you can do is provide choices to people, and not be like those Catholics that go to Africa and tell them not to use condoms.

[Trexller]

two words:

birth licensing

bastard children become wards of the state where they are trained from birth to be super soldiers

there's no way this could cause a problem!

[Ripp]

It's precisely because of my humanism that I want less humans :)

No, it's because you're brainwashed and mentally ill. You want to kill other people but consider yourself above everyone else.

You're sick. Get help. Hope this helps.

https://media.giphy.com/media/TQbCSC7hZj2cU/giphy.gif

[Lune]

No, it's because you're brainwashed and mentally ill. You want to kill other people but consider yourself above everyone else.

You're sick. Get help. Hope this helps.


I don't know why one would assume I want to kill anyone. Projecting?

I just want fewer people to be born.

[Trexller]

No, it's because you're brainwashed and mentally ill. You want to kill other people but consider yourself above everyone else.

You're sick. Get help. Hope this helps.

this guy pipes in without reading the thread

this topic was resolved by page 4

read the thread and stop wasting our eyeballs

[Ripp]

I don't know why one would assume I want to kill anyone. Projecting?

I just want fewer people to be born.

Of course you do. You want to kill people and livestock to save the planet just like the rest of the psychos you worship. So, you go first.

That's what I thought.

https://media.giphy.com/media/1Syi8XSAkiFupEty1u/giphy.gif

[Ripp]

this guy pipes in without reading the thread

this topic was resolved by page 4

read the thread and stop wasting our eyeballs

Resolved? Then why are you wasting time reading the thread?

Clown.

[Lune]

Of course you do. You want to kill people and livestock to save the planet just like the rest of the psychos you worship. So, you go first.

That's what I thought.

Ok lol guess I'll take your word for it on what I think.

Cringey and psycho post. Clearly some type of boogeyman living rent free in your head

[Ripp]

Ok lol guess I'll take your word for it on what I think.

Cringey and psycho post. Clearly some type of boogeyman living rent free in your head

You kinda are a boogeyman. Anyone who wants to kill off people and livestock for some fictional "global warming" scam is insane. And you think you're a humanist? Far from it.

[aussenseiter]

You kinda are a boogeyman. Anyone who wants to kill off people and livestock for some fictional "global warming" scam is insane. And you think you're a humanist? Far from it.

It's worse than you think.

He doesn't want to kill anyone.

He wants them to not ever exist at all.

[unsunghero]

It's worse than you think.

He doesn't want to kill anyone.

He wants them to not ever exist at all.

Meh, I don't see a lot wrong with educating people in shitholes like parts of Africa that birth control exists, rather than encourage them to breed like fish where they expect 30-50% of the baby fish schools to die off

But by birth control I'm more of a fan of condoms and other forms like IUD rather than abortions

[Elizondo]

Lune - "Make Eugenics Great Again!"

[aussenseiter]

Meh, I don't see a lot wrong with educating people in shitholes like parts of Africa that birth control exists, rather than encourage them to breed like fish where they expect 30-50% of the baby fish schools to die off

But by birth control I'm more of a fan of condoms and other forms like IUD rather than abortions

You are in schism with the Almighty, Lutherist. :p

[Lune]

Jesus never even said to shit out a bunch of kids, that's old testament shit. You might as well be jewish at that point

[aussenseiter]

Jesus never even said to shit out a bunch of kids, that's old testament shit. You might as well be jewish at that point

The lamb was slain before the foundation of the Earth.

Hope this helps!

[Trexller]

Meh, I don't see a lot wrong with educating people in shitholes like parts of Africa that birth control exists, rather than encourage them to breed like fish where they expect 30-50% of the baby fish schools to die off

But by birth control I'm more of a fan of condoms and other forms like IUD rather than abortions

this is by design

central africa has a similiar geographic advantage that the united states has, so it is purposefully kept in a state of chaos.

were some faction to realize this and unite the continent across central africa, it would result in a nation with the geographic security and abundant resources like the U.S. has. everything to make a world super-power exists there, minerals, oil, year-round agriculture, etc. central africa is in a better position than china or russia, but it's constantly fighting itself so nothing gets done.

it's the only other place on earth where this is possible, no other region can be as self sufficient as the US could, so since europeans showed up the entire western world has worked to guarantee that a stable and united central african super-power cannot develop

[aussenseiter]

this is by design

central africa has a similiar geographic advantage that the united states has, so it is purposefully kept in a state of chaos.

were some faction to realize this and unite the continent across central africa, it would result in a nation with the geographic security and abundant resources like the U.S. has. everything to make a world super-power exists there, minerals, oil, year-round agriculture, etc. central africa is in a better position than china or russia, but it's constantly fighting itself so nothing gets done.

it's the only other place on earth where this is possible, no other region can be as self sufficient as the US could, so since europeans showed up the entire western world has worked to guarantee that a stable and united central african super-power cannot develop

Why doesn't South America the same geography?

[Lune]

this is by design

central africa has a similiar geographic advantage that the united states has, so it is purposefully kept in a state of chaos.

were some faction to realize this and unite the continent across central africa, it would result in a nation with the geographic security and abundant resources like the U.S. has. everything to make a world super-power exists there, minerals, oil, year-round agriculture, etc. central africa is in a better position than china or russia, but it's constantly fighting itself so nothing gets done.

it's the only other place on earth where this is possible, no other region can be as self sufficient as the US could, so since europeans showed up the entire western world has worked to guarantee that a stable and united central african super-power cannot develop

Actually the strat is to lock down australia for the +2 Then you bottleneck at kamchatka

[Trexller]

Why doesn't South America the same geography?

it does to a degree. there are issues with agriculture and minerals. but that isn't a deal breaker. it's more to the fact that they are already established "developed nations" and those entities aren't going to be likely to agree to be one nation, while everything is always up in the air in africa because no one can agree on permanent borders. being undeveloped without agreed upon borders leaves africa rife for unification. If someone could convince them to get out of their own way.

a south american super power would kinda be like asking all of europe to unite under a banner.

not impossible, but basically impossible

[aussenseiter]

it does to a degree. there are issues with agriculture and minerals. but that isn't a deal breaker. it's more to the fact that they are already established "developed nations" and those entities aren't going to be likely to agree to be one nation, while everything is always up in the air in africa because no one can agree on permanent borders. being undeveloped without agreed upon borders leaves africa rife for unification. If someone could convince them to get out of their own way.

a south american super power would kinda be like asking all of europe to unite under a banner.

not impossible, but basically impossible

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bolivarianism

There's Pan-Arabism and Pan-Africanism too.

It's the time it is and it is now.

[Trexller]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bolivarianism

There's Pan-Arabism and Pan-Africanism too.

It's the time it is and it is now.

right but you'd have to get them all to agree to cooperate for something bigger and better

then along comes a CIA attached Green Beret with a suitcase full of cash and the promise of whatever your weakness is and then you do whatever you're told, and are happy to do it.

it's not like we don't do business with venezuela (overtly) because of their socialist authoritarian gov't, we do business with china everyday. the VZ problem is that they refuse to get on board with global finance, central banks etc. within their gov't cabal there is this historical, like traditional revulsion of anything American, european etc.

feels like i could know more about south american politics, but that's reading for another day

[aussenseiter]

right but you'd have to get them all to agree to cooperate for something bigger and better

then along comes a CIA attached Green Beret with a suitcase full of cash and the promise of whatever your weakness is and then you do whatever you're told, and are happy to do it.

They're mostly socialist jerks so I gotta side with the CIA beret fellas. :p

[Lune]

You know north korea calls itself democratic and we dont characterize democracy based on what north korea does

[aussenseiter]

You know north korea calls itself democratic and we dont characterize democracy based on what north korea does

I can call myself a shoe and you wouldn't believe me either.

Or would you?

[magnetaress]

I can call myself a shoe and you wouldn't believe me either.

Or would you?

Id respect ur choice.

[Trexller]

hmm

72uza9JpT-I

[magnetaress]

dpvd9FensT8?si=D4-Z_Kr1GIl1RRxr

[Ooloo]

Read about the Holocene Extinction. The current rate of extinction far surpasses the normal background rate.

There is no reason we need more than 8 billion humans. It benefits nobody, not even humans. Just less space and resources for everyone. Nevermind that ecosystem collapse has implications for our happiness, survival, and prosperity.

Saying humans are a part of nature, while technically true, glosses over the important truth that unlike every other species, we are self-aware and capable of knowing better. We can choose to manage our own population and not breed like a bunch of fucking bacteria.

Yeah who needs another einstein, ya know?

Elon is still correct: More humans rather than less is obviously better because humans do all the things that benefit humans, including minimizing carbon emissions. So unless you harbor some antipathy toward the human race as a whole, there's no good argument for less humans as opposed to more. Even if some amazing AI comes along to relieve us all of the drudgery of life, it's gonna be a human that develops that AI in the first place.

[magnetaress]

Hurricane Lee is a really apocalyptic badass... imagine NYC taking something like this to the face 😐😑😲☺🙁😵😱

(Or DC for that matter even tho it's inland a ways).

[aussenseiter]

Hurricane Lee is a really apocalyptic badass... imagine NYC taking something like this to the face 💀 😳 😐 😩 😵😱

God has spared His judgment from Holy Florida and will pour out His Wrath upon Georgia and South Carolina.

It's a real shame Fulton County is so inland. Talk about flyover country!

[magnetaress]

God has spared His judgment from Holy Florida and will pour out His Wrath upon Georgia.

It's a real shame Fulton County is so inland. Talk about flyover country!

Honestly I wouldn't want this thing to hit anyone at full strength it's sustained 150mph in a 25 -35 mile radius and gusting upto 250mph


It's like a small mobile continuous nuke sans the heat and the pressure wave at the moment.

[Landroval]

Oh look! Weather!

https://media.giphy.com/media/13aSSyJaI5NkTm/giphy.gif

Those are some tasty atmospheric deserts soaking up water to become atmospheric rivers right there. Gaia is healing the desertification of the 30th parallels.

You 32, 33, 34, and 35ers need to pipe the fuck down. The word you're looking for is called Solar Irradiance.

[Evia]

I remember when I was just out of high school I went and saw a movie with Jake Gyllenhaal called The Day After Tomorrow or something. I only realize now that I'm older that I watched a feature length propaganda film disguised as a Hollywood blockbuster.

[Landroval]

I remember when I was just out of high school I went and saw a movie with Jake Gyllenhaal called The Day After Tomorrow or something. I only realize now that I'm older that I watched a feature length propaganda film disguised as a Hollywood blockbuster.


They don't even disguise em anymore. The zoomer is so retardedly stupid that if they were to veil the propaganda in the slightest way, they wouldn't get it.

[unsunghero]

I remember when I was just out of high school I went and saw a movie with Jake Gyllenhaal called The Day After Tomorrow or something. I only realize now that I'm older that I watched a feature length propaganda film disguised as a Hollywood blockbuster.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=gzV8Q2fsN0o

[magnetaress]

I agree zoomers are tarded.

[Topgunben]

I remember being forced to watch "An Inconvenient Truth" in school, starring none other than Al Gore.

I remember the graph that showed that New York should be under 20 feet of water by now.

[Trexller]

yeah the only inconvenient truth is that the liberals got sick of big oil controlling the whole world

the past 20 years has been nothing but every other industry rallying together to reduce their influence