View Full Version : did 2hand improvement effect rangers?
radbeard
05-05-2021, 02:10 AM
I know there was some 2hand formula change that made 2handers better overall. Did that effect rangers too? Is Woodsman staff more effective than it used to be as a result? Thanks!
Toxigen
05-05-2021, 09:00 AM
nah pretty sure rangers are still bad outside of speedbumping raid targets
Crede
05-05-2021, 10:06 AM
Yes, the 2h bonus would make rangers better with woodmans staff.
MiRo2
05-05-2021, 10:30 AM
I believe it just affected the 2 hander damage bonus, which isn't really noticable with weapons with less than 40 delay.
Gozuk
05-05-2021, 02:06 PM
Chicks dig dual wield
radbeard
05-05-2021, 02:19 PM
okay, thanks for the help! Is it the case then that the 2hand bonuses are now as listed here: https://lucy.allakhazam.com/dmgbonus.html?setcookie=1 ?
Crede
05-05-2021, 03:46 PM
I don’t think anyone knows the exact 2h bonus here except that it gets better with higher delay. Either way I’d rock woodmans staff 20-50+ until you can replace with offhand epic and a respectable primary weapon like sboz or better.
Yinein
05-05-2021, 06:15 PM
Cek 2h outdps my kriezen flame usually. 2h the way to go
Baler
05-05-2021, 06:16 PM
rangers != knights
Yinein
05-05-2021, 06:20 PM
rangers != knights
That's true, they are better
Cecily
05-05-2021, 06:28 PM
Cek 2h outdps my kriezen flame usually. 2h the way to go
Yeah that's one thing I wish I got. Baton + flame might be best combo for soloing with capped dex. Woulda been fun regardless.
vBulletin® v3.8.11, Copyright ©2000-2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.