Succor

[greblhad]

Hi, I just want to understand why Succor is not considered broken. Is it defiantly classic that it uses 1k mana instead of the amount on the spell, plus uses mana from passengers or do we need to prove it shouldn't be broken? If we are to prove it shouldn't be broken, how could we possibly go about doing this?

Just based on the history it should never have cost 1k mana, the most it should every have cost is 750.

2002-06-12 12:27 Changed Npc_no_cast from 0 to 100
2002-06-05 11:20 Changed SpellIcon from to
2002-03-19 05:50 Changed Mana cost from 300 to 100
2002-03-19 05:50 Changed Slot 2 from "Evacuate group to safe point in zone" to "Evacuate to -150,-1,-1 in same facing NW"
2002-03-19 05:50 Changed Slot 1 from "Decrease Mana by 750" to "Decrease Mana by 150"
2002-03-07 11:32 Initial Entry

[Sunderfury]

Hi, I just want to understand why Succor is not considered broken. Is it defiantly classic that it uses 1k mana instead of the amount on the spell, plus uses mana from passengers or do we need to prove it shouldn't be broken? If we are to prove it shouldn't be broken, how could we possibly go about doing this?

Just based on the history it should never have cost 1k mana, the most it should every have cost is 750.

2002-06-12 12:27 Changed Npc_no_cast from 0 to 100
2002-06-05 11:20 Changed SpellIcon from to
2002-03-19 05:50 Changed Mana cost from 300 to 100
2002-03-19 05:50 Changed Slot 2 from "Evacuate group to safe point in zone" to "Evacuate to -150,-1,-1 in same facing NW"
2002-03-19 05:50 Changed Slot 1 from "Decrease Mana by 750" to "Decrease Mana by 150"
2002-03-07 11:32 Initial Entry

Isn't the 'Mana Cost' the amount of mana needed to cast the spell, and the 'Decrease Mana by 750' the drain component? What am I missing here. 300 + 750 = 1,050 mana.

Unsure why I shouldn't move this to resolved.

Edit: Search feature, classic evidence of the 1000 mana cost. Moving to resolved.