PDA

View Full Version : Why not implement a (1) box limit?


Godly
10-01-2017, 05:51 AM
Why not implement a (1) box limit for a month or two just to test it out and see how it works out for R99? The box is already struggling as it is. I think it may help the box thrive.

Make Norrath great again. - Godly for president 2017.

Ivah
10-01-2017, 08:30 AM
here we go again

drelk001
10-01-2017, 10:01 AM
screw that.

Jazzy
10-01-2017, 10:15 AM
Svr already thriving

Tassador
10-01-2017, 10:30 AM
Svr already thriving

Exactly!

Palemoon
10-01-2017, 08:29 PM
No.

Interdependence breeds community.

AzzarTheGod
10-02-2017, 03:20 AM
Svr already thriving

Amyas
10-02-2017, 12:17 PM
No...... boxing is bad bad bad bad

Amyas
10-02-2017, 02:15 PM
Boxing would cause even less people to group up.

KEWLGET
10-02-2017, 04:24 PM
banning boxing only hurts the people who don't do it

those who want to do it do it anyway and there's almost no way for them to be caught other than openly admitting to doing so unless they're actually just retarded

Shrubwise
10-02-2017, 04:25 PM
Boxing would be fun. Nobody takes Red seriously as it is. I don't see why we got so many people with such strong aversions to boxing.

Baler
10-02-2017, 04:26 PM
No boxing is one of p99's selling points. There are people who play for that fact alone.

Shrubwise
10-02-2017, 04:33 PM
My argument is not population related, its more regarding the integrity of Red versus Blue. Blue is reputable and legitimate as they can get it; that's why I like blue, and wouldn't want boxing on blue. I even started a thread suggesting a second Blue server for only boxing folks who wanted to pay a subscription. Which is all fallacy anyways and everyone knows it because you can't charge for emulated EQ. besides my point.
Red is the bastard red-headed step child anyways and nobody holds it to the same standards as blue, so why not let Red be the playground? It already has non-classic EXP rates, too.

Baler
10-02-2017, 04:36 PM
this isn't blue its red, red has a population of less then 40 for more then half the day

the blue argument is valid the red argument is not

allowing boxing would make the pop surge

The pop would be the same and in fact boxing would hurt the chances of people joining.
It would hurt the pop because #1 how would we know the 40 players aren't just 20 people, in this scenario.

Also it would make the server so you had to box to be successful. 3 people would make a full group to exploit the group exp and gank anyone who's playing 1 or 2 characters.

Boxing would hurt p99 RED in it's current state.

---
Anarchy Online is currently having a similar issue with population and boxing in relation to population. The examples I've given in this post correlate. I also have first hand experience from ultima online when it comes to servers which allow boxing. Yes it makes the population LOOK bigger, but it doesn't actually increase the population as much as you'd think. And can hurt.

---
But you're just going to disagree with me and I presume you have no experience with this area of server management. Though I hope and believe your intentions are for the greater good of red 99.

Amyas
10-02-2017, 04:42 PM
theres no grouping as it is

boxing would help

you are stupid

also everyone who lives in Georgia is poor and stupid

This might be why red is low pop =P

SamwiseRed
10-02-2017, 06:31 PM
allow boxing and attune raid mobs so that they can be done with one group

also bone chips should give you pvp rewards.

Beastagoog
10-02-2017, 11:26 PM
You can practically box as it is. Only the dumbies get caught slipping.