PDA

View Full Version : My childhood hero has gone crazy


fash
04-25-2017, 03:05 PM
Instead of baking soda volcanoes from Bill Nye, he now teaches this degeneracy to children as "science".

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wllc5gSc-N8

loramin
04-25-2017, 03:09 PM
Wow, just ... wow.

The funny thing is I'm open to alternative gender definitions, alternative sexual preferences, and the rest of what (I think?) was in their message, so if anyone would like that video it would be someone like me ... but even I thought it was a steaming pile of horse crap.

fadetree
04-25-2017, 03:59 PM
It's the new religion. It's the ascendancy of form over function, childish emotion over maturity. Nothing else matters besides forcing people to admit that there's no such thing as gender. Once they've bent their minds around that, it's a lot easier to get them to buy off on other clearly crazy things. If I were gay I'd be pissed off and embarrassed. It's the new age of the snowflake, a hyper critical Nazi wave of the future where anything that even suggests that reality might be something other than what we've decided it is must be eliminated.

Pokesan
04-25-2017, 04:03 PM
your childhood hero was an actor? why?

AzzarTheGod
04-25-2017, 04:58 PM
the song wasn't that explicit...

its got mentions of sex but i dont see children being able to understand a word of it since adults can barely understand it

overblown buuut yeah its no longer bill nye the science guy

Bill Nye Agenda Guy

Dat Netflix deal.

AzzarTheGod
04-25-2017, 05:03 PM
If I were gay I'd be pissed off and embarrassed.

It pisses gays off. I've heard podcasts where there will be some SJW making the suggestion of gender/trans are their closest allies and they need to stand together now more than ever, and they all but get sneered at. Not quite open hostility, but its there.

The trans movement is making a mockery out of actual-normal sexual orientations like da ghey.

Daywolf
04-25-2017, 05:06 PM
He thinks it evolution...
For science!
http://i.imgur.com/prvzQjg.gif

Or maybe it's just man-made global warming so you better sign away your liberties.

The guy is just a 100% globalist elite spokeshole with a bachelors in mechanical engineering. He reads a script someone wrote for him, that's it.

Pokesan
04-25-2017, 08:39 PM
video of OP's "childhood hero"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4e6h4zLC5U8

Ahldagor
04-25-2017, 09:17 PM
That smooth heal to toe action. Never can deny the homosexual roots of Nazism.

AzzarTheGod
04-26-2017, 05:24 AM
That smooth heal to toe action. Never can deny the homosexual roots of Nazism.

smilin hard

JurisDictum
04-26-2017, 08:33 AM
Bill seems relatively successful at getting kids excited about science. I'm sure he could have obtained a more respectable degree if he didn't already have a T.V. gig when he was very young.

Now I'm not physical scientist. But follow me here here... There are such a thing as penises right? and Vagina's too right? and then, rarely, something in between the two occurs. That means sexual organs could be classified on a spectrum. Even if the ends of the spectrum are the most weighted.

Spyder73
04-26-2017, 09:29 AM
your childhood hero was an actor? why?

Nothing wrong with old school Bill Nye Mr. Cuckesan, your judgments are transparent.

Tiggles
04-26-2017, 09:49 AM
Soros invested in Netflix heavily last year that's why we have the Bill Nye show and the Dear White people propaganda.

https://www.thestreet.com/story/13377046/1/is-george-soros-right-to-bet-so-heavily-on-netflix.html

maskedmelon
04-26-2017, 10:38 AM
I loved bill nye when I was little. I even remember watching some of his shows in science class t school. it was a good program and I am disappointed it is without successor.

Is bill bye saves the world a children's program though? I've not watched or followed it, but to feature something like what was linked in OP in the premier, I would guess it is not a children's program. if anything it is aimed at the same audience of nye's original show who are now much older.

the song and stuff there was awful and I don't see the value it brings to any discussion.

Pokesan
04-26-2017, 11:39 AM
Nothing wrong with old school Bill Nye Mr. Cuckesan, your judgments are transparent.

i watched almost live! as a kid. it was funny.

getting mad at an actors politics is pretty silly!

Nilstoniakrath
04-26-2017, 02:24 PM
i watched almost live! as a kid. it was funny.

getting mad at an actors politics is pretty silly!

says the Reagan-hating, Trump-hating libturd

Lune
04-26-2017, 03:01 PM
Bill seems relatively successful at getting kids excited about science. I'm sure he could have obtained a more respectable degree if he didn't already have a T.V. gig when he was very young.

Now I'm not physical scientist. But follow me here here... There are such a thing as penises right? and Vagina's too right? and then, rarely, something in between the two occurs. That means sexual organs could be classified on a spectrum. Even if the ends of the spectrum are the most weighted.

Sex is not defined by our organs but our genes. That's where I break with the attempts to normalize what are essentially genetic or endocrine disorders that cause aberrant expression of secondary sex characteristics.

Yea, if somebody is androgynous because of hormonal issues growing up and they have an erectile clitoris and their labia majora are baggy and wrinkled like scrote, I'm perfectly happy to recognize their genderfluidity and be compassionate about it.

Now I'm guessing that type of situation probably represents no more than 5-10% of non-binary's and I'd curious what the actual number is. The other 95% are those who, due to some combination of psychological and possibly mild endocrine abnormality, identify as something besides their genetic and puberty-developed sex. I don't really give a shit about that either as long as they're not demanding I use strange pronouns like ze, but I do think it's more likely they need to see a psychotherapist rather than a plastic surgeon.

Cecily
04-26-2017, 03:04 PM
Song was pretty gay.

Spyder73
04-26-2017, 03:20 PM
Sex is not defined by our organs but our genes. That's where I break with the attempts to normalize what are essentially genetic or endocrine disorders that cause aberrant expression of secondary sex characteristics.

Yea, if somebody is androgynous because of hormonal issues growing up and they have an erectile clitoris and their labia majora are baggy and wrinkled like scrote, I'm perfectly happy to recognize their genderfluidity and be compassionate about it.

Now I'm guessing that type of situation probably represents no more than 5-10% of non-binary's and I'd curious what the actual number is. The other 95% are those who, due to some combination of psychological and possibly mild endocrine abnormality, identify as something besides their genetic and puberty-developed sex. I don't really give a shit about that either as long as they're not demanding I use strange pronouns like ze, but I do think it's more likely they need to see a psychotherapist rather than a plastic surgeon.

That fact that this wiki page (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pangender) exists is a testament to people needing to go to the shrink over the plastic surgeon. Its just out of hand

Jarnauga
04-26-2017, 03:37 PM
ITT grandmas straight from the 60's getting shocked at the lyrics of the rolling stones and led zeppelin songs

Lune
04-26-2017, 03:45 PM
ITT grandmas straight from the 60's getting shocked at the lyrics of the rolling stones and led zeppelin songs

It's more like if you're watching a show that's supposed to be about science and instead you're getting dogma telling you to think in a very non-scientific way about barely relevant social issues.

And I don't mind the underlying message; if Bill Nye wants to use his show to promote his opinion about sexual orientation, that's fine. But the bit was just cringey, very cringey.

Jarnauga
04-26-2017, 03:50 PM
It's more like if you're watching a show that's supposed to be about science and instead you're getting dogma telling you to think in a very non-scientific way about barely relevant social issues.

And I don't mind the underlying message; if Bill Nye wants to use his show to promote his opinion about sexual orientation, that's fine. But the bit was just cringey, very cringey.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vPRfP_TEQ-g :p

mickmoranis
04-26-2017, 03:56 PM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vPRfP_TEQ-g :p

Id say north korea has better shows but we spend all that money on rockets aimed at north korea so....

Daywolf
04-26-2017, 03:58 PM
Soros invested in Netflix heavily last year that's why we have the Bill Nye show and the Dear White people propaganda.

https://www.thestreet.com/story/13377046/1/is-george-soros-right-to-bet-so-heavily-on-netflix.html
Oh yeah, Netflix went all SJW, I unsubscribed like many have because of it last year. Was good a couple years ago, but I guess Soros decided to turn it into a propaganda opportunity i.e. hate your skin color, hate your gender, hate your God, hate your country and hate your Mom. Soros is one delusional cat, he openly professes to be God, and he's out there to shape the world into his image and put himself at the top along with his globalist coworkers. Yeah, Nye belongs to Soros.

Soros, literally, the dude worked for Hitler during WWII, removing gold from peoples teeth and belongings before taken away to be killed.

mickmoranis
04-26-2017, 03:59 PM
Instead of baking soda volcanoes from Bill Nye, he now teaches this degeneracy to children as "science".

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wllc5gSc-N8

Everything wrong with this video:

1. Nye ironically genders his audience with "guys" in the first sentence.
2. No one knows this girl from Crazy Ex-Girlfriend.
3. Humans are now apparently referred to as "bipeds" which is ableist against war vets with 1 leg.
4. "World of ours" implies the earth belongs to humans, which is western chauvinism and not environmentally friendly.
5. If she has a vagina, she does not have the option of "hard"...she's stuck with "moist."
6. Her vagina does not have a voice; that's gross. If it makes a sound it is actually air escaping and is rude.
7. When she sings about her vagina she holds her stomach not her vagina. Anatomy error.
8. "Metaphorical voice" is 6 syllables and she crams it into a 3 syllable section of the music.
9. The woman is so out of shape she can't do a proper front kick her and looks like an elephant trying to walk up steps.
10. "Butt stuff" is not highly related to evolution. Any mammal that does "butt stuff" routinely will actually be selected out. It's evolution in the same sense that extinction is evolution.
11. Sex "stew" assuming it refers to bisexual orgies actually are taboo in most societies. Anthropology error.
12. This is Gerard Depardieu: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/5/5c/G%C3%A9rard_Depardieu_Cannes_2015_3.jpg/200px-G%C3%A9rard_Depardieu_Cannes_2015_3.jpg
13. Singer declares that she will have sex with anything. And is proud of this.
14. No one is boxing in her box.
15. She recommends jerking off strangers.
16. After 1:30 minutes of singing she is out of breath. This is pathetic.
17. Sexuality is not a spectrum. See evolution of mammalian sex. The book Red Queen gives a good description (by Matt or Mark Ridley...I forgot).
18. 1:38 Bill Nye grooving is sexually repulsive.
19. No one uses a Fleshlight outdoors. It is used inside, with appropriate shame.
20. Bill Nye grooving again.
21. 2:03 Watch her try to kick. It's like watching someone on their first day of training.
22. 2:10 - Ironically tells normal people who are going about their business to get off THEIR soapbox while lecturing Americans from a position of ignorance.
23. Bagels with lox are disgusting...and so maybe her box is better than that.
24. 2:20 The face of Satan appears.
25. Ignorant non-scientist calls this "exactly the right message."

Thank you for re-electing President Trump.

Lune
04-26-2017, 03:59 PM
Id say north korea has better shows but we spend all that money on rockets aimed at north korea so....

nah, MURICA (https://youtu.be/7cl-f8NABMM?t=2m2s)

loramin
04-26-2017, 04:32 PM
Soros, literally, the dude worked for Hitler during WWII, removing gold from peoples teeth and belongings before taken away to be killed.

You really shouldn't believe everything you read on the internet:

http://www.snopes.com/george-soros-ss-nazi-germany/

mickmoranis
04-26-2017, 04:40 PM
You really shouldn't believe everything you read on the internet:

http://www.snopes.com/george-soros-ss-nazi-germany/

Soros admits he was a nazi collaborator so idk what to tell you, sorry. (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0PUDmLCkgNc)

KROFT: My understanding is that you went out with this protector of yours who swore that you were his adopted godson.

SOROS: Yes. Yes.

KROFT: Went out, in fact, and helped in the confiscation of property from your fellow Jews, friends and neighbors.

SOROS: Yes. That’s right. Yes.

KROFT: I mean, that sounds like an experience that would send lots of people to the psychiatric couch for many, many, years. Was it difficult?

SOROS: No, not at all. Not at all, I rather enjoyed it.

KROFT: No feelings of guilt?

SOROS: No, only feelings of absolute power.

loramin
04-26-2017, 05:03 PM
Hmmm watch a 13 minute long random YouTube or believe Snopes ... tough decision.

I get that Soros is like the Karl Rove to the right, and I hate that fucker (Rove; I honestly don't know much about Soros). I'm willing to believe all sorts of terrible things about Rove because I know he's a terrible person, and so I totally get someone else wanting to believe terrible things about another political operative on the opposite end of the spectrum.

BUT ... you have to live in reality, not your own made-up fantasy land. Well, except for Norath of course.

Jarnauga
04-26-2017, 05:27 PM
nah, MURICA (https://youtu.be/7cl-f8NABMM?t=2m2s)

the fuck is wrong with y'all

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wnDQkasEZWA

AzzarTheGod
04-26-2017, 05:30 PM
Hmmm watch a 13 minute long random YouTube or believe Snopes ... tough decision.

I get that Soros is like the Karl Rove to the right, and I hate that fucker (Rove; I honestly don't know much about Soros). I'm willing to believe all sorts of terrible things about Rove because I know he's a terrible person, and so I totally get someone else wanting to believe terrible things about another political operative on the opposite end of the spectrum.

BUT ... you have to live in reality, not your own made-up fantasy land. Well, except for Norath of course.


This is a pretty brave post. Gotta respect this guy for coming out.

The difference would be, Roves money is off-shore and he is incapable of buying anything in the USA because he cant launder it through the trademarked Mitt Romney Buddies Against American Taxes system.

Not to mention the discrepency in sheer net worth. Its not a good comparison but I understand exactly what you meant.

HOWEVER, the beef the far right has with Soros is exactly due to his wallet, take that away, and the problems people have with him are solved. He has the biggest warchest in politics even rivaling the Koch bros.

If you are against money in politics, you are against Soros. I guess we know where you stand? Or maybe you just think Soros political spending is overblown and not all that great comparatively to far right spending?

Daywolf
04-26-2017, 05:42 PM
Hmmm watch a 13 minute long random YouTube or believe Snopes ... tough decision.

I get that Soros is like the Karl Rove to the right, and I hate that fucker (Rove; I honestly don't know much about Soros). I'm willing to believe all sorts of terrible things about Rove because I know he's a terrible person, and so I totally get someone else wanting to believe terrible things about another political operative on the opposite end of the spectrum.

BUT ... you have to live in reality, not your own made-up fantasy land. Well, except for Norath of course.

er he's responsible for the murder of millions and millions of people. The guy boasts over using his money to infiltrate and overthrow/destroy countries. He's one of the most vial modern globalists of our time.

Snopes is BS. The owners are deep into trouble, a bunch of con artists etc. I hope they get locked up. You may as well be on the North Korean internet if you think you are getting any un-twisted facts from snopes.

AzzarTheGod
04-26-2017, 05:51 PM
er he's responsible for the murder of millions and millions of people. The guy boasts over using his money to infiltrate and overthrow/destroy countries. He's one of the most vial modern globalists of our time.

Snopes is BS. The owners are deep into trouble, a bunch of con artists etc. I hope they get locked up. You may as well be on the North Korean internet if you think you are getting any un-twisted facts from snopes.

This is true. Again, the Rove comparison is a little....uhhhhh........

What would be a better comparison

Daywolf
04-26-2017, 05:55 PM
HOWEVER, the beef the far right has with Soros is exactly due to his wallet, take that away, and the problems people have with him are solved. He has the biggest warchest in politics even rivaling the Koch bros.
Far right? Anyone with a brain... It's not the money, money is just a tool to achieve the goals, and that goal is changing the world (much done already) and grabbing control of it all by Soros and his friends. This guy is one of the top top globalists. He probably sits in Illuminati meetings if there are such things.

Even if he lost all his money as you suggest, he'd get more. Money isn't the issue, he's got power and connections. He's not alone and he's already established and relied upon. Everyone here has been influenced by him in some way at some point, including myself. The guy is one of the most evil men in the world, but very elusive to not be arrested etc.

I mean really, if there were such a thing as ZOG, this guys sits on the board of directors.

Jarnauga
04-26-2017, 05:59 PM
Snopes is BS. The owners are deep into trouble, a bunch of con artists etc. I hope they get locked up. You may as well be on the North Korean internet if you think you are getting any un-twisted facts from snopes.

you spelled infowars wrong

Daywolf
04-26-2017, 06:13 PM
you spelled infowars wrong
Well if that is really true, I hope they get busted too. But accusations mean nothing, the loons running snopes are exposed in the open. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4042194/Facebook-fact-checker-arbitrate-fake-news-accused-defrauding-website-pay-prostitutes-staff-includes-escort-porn-star-Vice-Vixen-domme.html

it's nothing but a fake news leftist political site pretending to be some self-righteous moral police. I hope them and facebook tank for their corruptions.

Lune
04-26-2017, 06:31 PM
http://i.imgur.com/xyyqeGQ.png

loramin
04-26-2017, 06:33 PM
The difference would be, Roves money is off-shore ... not to mention the discrepency in sheer net worth. Its not a good comparison but I understand exactly what you meant.

Yeah the point was more how we're willing to assume the worst of people we don't like than it was about money, but I completely agree, the Koch brothers would have been better.

If you are against money in politics, you are against Soros. I guess we know where you stand?

Like I said I really don't know much about Soros, but campaign finance reform is an issue I feel passionately about. And it's not in any way a partisan issue: both sides are awash in special interest (largely corporate) money, and it's ruining our country/democracy.

But then right after your well-reasoned and thoughtful response we get Daywolf and his paranoid schizophrenic fantasy reality ... /sigh

Tankdan
04-26-2017, 07:30 PM
I just don't get why Democrats of today are more liberal than liberals were merely 10 years ago. Why can't Dems just be good fun-loving Dems and not this SJW bullshit we get spewed in our face every day?

Daywolf
04-26-2017, 07:36 PM
But then right after your well-reasoned and thoughtful response we get Daywolf and his paranoid schizophrenic fantasy reality ... /sigh
Like I said I really don't know much about Soros
Yeah like you said. But I do, while you still don't :rolleyes:
Ignorance is bliss. Yeah, my reply there is far from blissful. I disturbed your bliss :( so you lashed out personally :rolleyes:
That's not very good bliss for you :D

Evia
04-26-2017, 07:42 PM
He thinks it evolution...
For science!
http://i.imgur.com/prvzQjg.gif

Or maybe it's just man-made global warming so you better sign away your liberties.

The guy is just a 100% globalist elite spokeshole with a bachelors in mechanical engineering. He reads a script someone wrote for him, that's it.


Smiling hard

maskedmelon
04-26-2017, 07:44 PM
I just don't get why Democrats of today are more liberal than liberals were merely 10 years ago. Why can't Dems just be good fun-loving Dems and not this SJW bullshit we get spewed in our face every day?

progress! conscience is not so easily placated with inaction! we must do something if we are to find meaning in our irrelevant lives. i don't see it as all that bad a thing because those on the right find additional purpose at the same time in resistance. life is meaningless absent conflict and so we are compelled to delude ourselves indefinitely be it in promoting the inane or protesting the mundane.

maskedmelonpai
04-26-2017, 07:48 PM
http://i.imgur.com/xyyqeGQ.png

that a x chromosome or a y one? it look confused. i beginning to understand more now.

Daywolf
04-26-2017, 07:52 PM
I just don't get why Democrats of today are more liberal than liberals were merely 10 years ago. Why can't Dems just be good fun-loving Dems and not this SJW bullshit we get spewed in our face every day?
Because there are liberals and then there are Progressive-liberals. They can be pretty different, while actual liberalism is dying in the demoncrat party... well evacuating it. Many of them going to like libertarian etc.

Liberal is not a party after all, and there are many even in the republican party (not my party) that would be considered classic liberal. Progressives just are not. The progressive movement started about 100 years ago (it's a good research study). Some claim it's extinct, but imo it has only progressed while many of the same ideology is still in play, though more progressively.

They were pretty progressive in the beginning though, but realized too potent and were being rejected. So the movement toned down for the long haul. Now they are far more progressive than in the beginning, and the pace of their progression has greatly increased now.


that a x chromosome or a y one? it look confused. i beginning to understand more now. Those are pliers, used in surgical procedures, if not using a hatchet depending on the nature of the procedure.

mickmoranis
04-26-2017, 08:53 PM
Hmmm watch a 13 minute long random YouTube or believe Snopes ... tough decision.

I get that Soros is like the Karl Rove to the right, and I hate that fucker (Rove; I honestly don't know much about Soros). I'm willing to believe all sorts of terrible things about Rove because I know he's a terrible person, and so I totally get someone else wanting to believe terrible things about another political operative on the opposite end of the spectrum.

BUT ... you have to live in reality, not your own made-up fantasy land. Well, except for Norath of course.

Someone asked what happened to liberals.

Whelp here is your answer:

Libs refuse listen to the man literally say he heartlessly collected wealth from jews by collaborating and hear him say, "if it wasnt me someone else would have and I feel no remorse"... or believe snopes that its not true because it has a webpage that says that 1 photo of a nazi isnt him.

Brilliant.

Cecily
04-26-2017, 09:07 PM
Wonder if you guys could like un-invest yourselves from whatever it is you're frothing at the mouth about for a moment and see how crazy you look being upset about it. It was just a bad song about it being ok to be gay. There's nothing wrong about that. Your gay children will all find this type of thing very normal in the future.

Pokesan
04-26-2017, 09:10 PM
Wonder if you guys could like un-invest yourselves from whatever it is you're frothing at the mouth about for a moment and see how crazy you look being upset about it. It was just a bad song about it being ok to be gay. There's nothing wrong about that. Your gay children will all find this type of thing very normal in the future.

I plan to have my children screened for the gay in utero, so this is an empty threat.

mickmoranis
04-26-2017, 09:21 PM
Your gay children will all find this type of thing very normal in the future.

you mean "our" gay children you fascist

loramin
04-26-2017, 09:26 PM
Someone asked what happened to liberals.

Whelp here is your answer:

Libs refuse listen to the man literally say he heartlessly collected wealth from jews by collaborating and hear him say, "if it wasnt me someone else would have and I feel no remorse"... or believe snopes that its not true because it has a webpage that says that 1 photo of a nazi isnt him.

Brilliant.

Remember when those crazy anti-abortion people made their fake anti-Planned Parenthood videos look legit? If you hate George Soros enough to make a video, it's not beyond the realm of possibility that you might create falsehoods about him. The same holds true for Koch brother videos; I'm not picking on one side.

And heck, maybe it's un-edited and perfectly accurate ... but I'm still not watching 13 minutes of crazy Youtube video of a guy that I couldn't give two fucks about, and then wasting even more time having to research whether it's accurate.

Ahldagor
04-26-2017, 09:33 PM
Good to know not everyone is a pillhead on this forum.

mickmoranis
04-26-2017, 09:34 PM
Remember when those crazy anti-abortion people made their fake anti-Planned Parenthood videos look legit? If you hate George Soros enough to make a video, it's not beyond the realm of possibility that you might create falsehoods about him. The same holds true for Koch brother videos; I'm not picking on one side.

And heck, maybe it's un-edited and perfectly accurate ... but I'm still not watching 13 minutes of crazy Youtube video of a guy that I couldn't give two fucks about, and then wasting even more time having to research whether it's accurate.

Lora.. I love you and all your everquest adventures, but please, do not say that a interview that was scrubbed from the internet that very clearly describes from the horses mouth what it was he did in Nazi Controlled Germany, is fake.

This line of thinking is why democrats are losing more and more supporters, we just cant be so willfully confirmation biased.

If it's in a politico article, its far more fake than anything someone who is telling you your party is totally broken is.

Nilstoniakrath
04-26-2017, 10:02 PM
Remember when those crazy anti-abortion people made their fake anti-Planned Parenthood videos look legit?

But editing the Zimmerman tape to delete the dispatcher asking what race Trayvon Martin was, is totally legit, since it furthered the narrative that you totally believe in with all your heart and soul.

And just what was edited out of the Planned Parenthood video, anyways? Them wiping the embryo blood off their lips?

mickmoranis
04-26-2017, 10:14 PM
"Im not going to believe anything anymore outside of what my political party tells me to cus I heard that there was a weird planned parent hood video that was about as realistic as that alien autopsy video once and I have never seen either of them."

loramin
04-26-2017, 10:18 PM
Lora.. I love you and all your everquest adventures
:D Right back at you big guy.

do not say that a interview that was scrubbed from the internet that very clearly describes from the horses mouth what it was he did in Nazi Controlled Germany, is fake.

This line of thinking is why democrats are losing more and more supporters, we just cant be so willfully confirmation biased.

If it's in a politico article, its far more fake than anything someone who is telling you your party is totally broken is.

You seem to think I like Soros. You've probably got this vision of a libtard with Soros posters on his wall, just as I have visions of y'all conservitards with your Karl Rove and Koch brothers posters. We all imagine things about people we don't know.

But you'll just have to trust that I truly don't care about George Soros. Really. Today is the most I've ever even heard the man's name used in my entire life.

So I'm not saying that video is false, and I'm not saying it's true. What I'm saying is that I am a lazy bastard who doesn't want to watch a 13 minute video with no timestamp about some guy I don't know/care about. I also don't want to have to do the research afterwards to find out whether my confirmation bias is making me think the video is true/false when it's actually the opposite.

Oh, and I'm also saying that was a terrible, terrible song.

But if you're so certain this video is absolute truth because you don't like him and not because you've done critical open-minded thinking and research, isn't that confirmation bias?

maskedmelonpai
04-26-2017, 10:21 PM
it immoral to not kill babies who otherwise gonna suffer and spawn lineages of suffering. most men too small to accept such thankless responsibility though and would rather hide behind the faux piety of protecting the innocent, while actually compelling the innocent to suffer. most those who support it though don't even support it for the right reason, they support it on some idiotic right of a woman to choose for herself. she did choose. she chose when she took another person inside her. the child though, it not choose. it stuck with the shit parents who made it and forced to live a life of misery with naught to look forward to, but crafting more like itself.

loramin
04-26-2017, 10:25 PM
But editing the Zimmerman tape to delete the dispatcher asking what race Trayvon Martin was, is totally legit, since it furthered the narrative that you totally believe in with all your heart and soul.

And just what was edited out of the Planned Parenthood video, anyways? Them wiping the embryo blood off their lips?

What's this about the Zimmerman dispatcher? If he edited the tapes in an illegal way he should go to jail and if it was just something that dispatchers do and people are making a big deal out of it because of Zimmerman he shouldn't. But if you think I have some dog in the fight (other than wanting guilty people to go to jail) you're mistaken.

As for the Planned Parenthood videos, are you just arguing, or are you genuinely curious? I'll happily dig up a good article about them if you'll read it with an open mind, but otherwise I'm not going to waste my time.

loramin
04-26-2017, 10:26 PM
it immoral to not kill babies who otherwise gonna suffer and spawn lineages of suffering.

This has got to be the wisest thing I've ever seen you write melon.

Nilstoniakrath
04-26-2017, 10:27 PM
it moral to kill babies who otherwise gonna suffer and spawn lineages of suffering.

But it is immoral and racist to kill ISIS who beheads babies with chemical weapons, right you F-ing jerkoff libturd?

Nilstoniakrath
04-26-2017, 10:32 PM
What's this about the Zimmerman dispatcher? If he edited the tapes in an illegal way he should go to jail and if it was just something that dispatchers do and people are making a big deal out of it because of Zimmerman he shouldn't. But if you think I have some dog in the fight (other than wanting guilty people to go to jail) you're mistaken.

As for the Planned Parenthood videos, are you just arguing, or are you genuinely curious? I'll happily dig up a good article about them if you'll read it with an open mind, but otherwise I'm not going to waste my time.

The MSM edited the tape you idiot, not Zimmerman. They did so to make it sound like he did what he did based on race.

As for the PP vid, just say what it was that was fake, I don't need a link to some fake news article.

maskedmelonpai
04-26-2017, 10:37 PM
But it is immoral and racist to kill ISIS who beheads babies with chemical weapons, right you F-ing jerkoff libturd?

no, it immoral to promote suffering. abortion quell suffering. islam and many religion in general promote suffering. so do charity. it painful to right a wrong when the right seems so wrong, but unless you do, you just gonna get more wrong :c reason is not kind, but neither is it cruel. it simply is, indifferent, true and unchanging.

Daywolf
04-26-2017, 10:43 PM
As for the PP vid, just say what it was that was fake, I don't need a link to some fake news article.

The only thing that was fake in that whole thing was the autopsy of the guy that thought up the PP sting in the first place. RIP, my Brother :(

Nilstoniakrath
04-26-2017, 10:47 PM
no, it immoral to promote suffering. abortion quell suffering. islam and many religion in general promote suffering. so do charity. it painful to right a wrong when the right seems so wrong, but unless you do, you just gonna get more wrong :c reason is not kind, but neither is it cruel. it simply is, indifferent, true and unchanging.

By your logic we should sterilize libturds since their beliefs stifle innovation that would improve and prolong lives

loramin
04-26-2017, 10:53 PM
As for the PP vid, just say what it was that was fake, I don't need a link to some fake news article.

It's kind of complicated because it wasn't just one or two obvious lies, it was tons and tons of editing to make people look bad. I know you don't want a link, but for anyone else:

http://www.factcheck.org/2015/07/unspinning-the-planned-parenthood-video/

As I understand it they took tons and tons of footage and edited out everything except stuff that:

sounds bad out of context
sounds bad because the PP people were being tone-deaf and what they were saying was bad (but not illegal)
sounds bad to us laypeople (eg. the cost of fetuses for research) but is totally normal to medical research people

Now I know using fetuses for research is gross, but would you rather be grossed out and have a cure for some terminal baby disease or not be grossed out and have an actual dead baby?

At the end of the day, despite the videos generating huge amounts of publicity not a single PP employee was charged with anything (not even in "red" places), but the people behind the video are all in court (and/or jail?). If there had been even the tiniest shred of evidence the bible belt Republicans would have jumped at the chance to get PP with it ... but there was none.

Nilstoniakrath
04-26-2017, 10:59 PM
It's kind of complicated because it wasn't just one or two obvious lies, it was tons and tons of editing to make people look bad. I know you don't want a link, but for anyone else:

http://www.factcheck.org/2015/07/unspinning-the-planned-parenthood-video/

As I understand it they took tons and tons of footage and edited out everything except stuff that:

sounds bad out of context
sounds bad because the PP people were being tone-deaf and what they were saying was bad (but not illegal)
sounds bad to us laypeople (eg. the cost of fetuses for research) but is totally normal to medical research people

Now I know using fetuses for research is gross, but would you rather be grossed out and have a cure for some terminal baby disease or not be grossed out and have an actual dead baby?

At the end of the day, despite the videos generating huge amounts of publicity not a single PP employee was charged with anything (not even in "red" places), but the people behind the video are all in court (and/or jail?). If there had been even the tiniest shred of evidence the bible belt Republicans would have jumped at the chance to get PP with it ... but there was none.

You mean just like what the MSM does to conservatives 24/7/365? Outrageous.

Pokesan
04-26-2017, 11:04 PM
Some traits limit your childs future potential earning power and should be selected against. Downs and gay for example.

The point is how do we justify drawing the line and where?

Daywolf
04-26-2017, 11:11 PM
Oh shit. I can't even comment on it, I'm losing brain cells tryiing.

What would Kim Jung-un rule in a case like this? Oh yeah...
Kim Jung-un: "Guilty! tare them apart and feed them to my dogs!"

So obviously everyone in NK is subject to being 100% guilty if they are not a protected class. In our case the protected class is just broader than one single nutcase that thinks he's GOD over his country and it's people. No, we have a lot of little gods running around exempting from our laws such as politicians, MSM, sports stars, planned parenthood workers etc etc etc. while any that would oppose them suffer imprisonment or just becomes another heart attack gun statistic... well in this case anyway.

mickmoranis
04-26-2017, 11:14 PM
It's kind of complicated because it wasn't just one or two obvious lies, it was tons and tons of editing to make people look bad. I know you don't want a link, but for anyone else:

http://www.factcheck.org/2015/07/unspinning-the-planned-parenthood-video/

As I understand it they took tons and tons of footage and edited out everything except stuff that:

sounds bad out of context
sounds bad because the PP people were being tone-deaf and what they were saying was bad (but not illegal)
sounds bad to us laypeople (eg. the cost of fetuses for research) but is totally normal to medical research people

Now I know using fetuses for research is gross, but would you rather be grossed out and have a cure for some terminal baby disease or not be grossed out and have an actual dead baby?

At the end of the day, despite the videos generating huge amounts of publicity not a single PP employee was charged with anything (not even in "red" places), but the people behind the video are all in court (and/or jail?). If there had been even the tiniest shred of evidence the bible belt Republicans would have jumped at the chance to get PP with it ... but there was none.

Its amazing that you could put this much thought into a video that was proven fake years ago but put so much less thought into saying an uncut interview with someone is fake.

loramin
04-27-2017, 11:48 AM
but put so much less thought into saying an uncut interview with someone is fake.

Once again: I never said the video was a fake. What I said was that it could be, I don't know, but I don't give a fuck about George Soros and I'm not going to watch some stupid 13 minute long video about a guy I don't care about (and then have to research its legitimacy afterward).

He could be 100% legit eating babies with a nice Chianti in that video and I still wouldn't care (anymore than I would about watching any random stranger eat babies).

mickmoranis
04-27-2017, 02:18 PM
:D Right back at you big guy.



You seem to think I like Soros. You've probably got this vision of a libtard with Soros posters on his wall, just as I have visions of y'all conservitards with your Karl Rove and Koch brothers posters. We all imagine things about people we don't know.

But you'll just have to trust that I truly don't care about George Soros. Really. Today is the most I've ever even heard the man's name used in my entire life.

So I'm not saying that video is false, and I'm not saying it's true. What I'm saying is that I am a lazy bastard who doesn't want to watch a 13 minute video with no timestamp about some guy I don't know/care about. I also don't want to have to do the research afterwards to find out whether my confirmation bias is making me think the video is true/false when it's actually the opposite.

Oh, and I'm also saying that was a terrible, terrible song.

But if you're so certain this video is absolute truth because you don't like him and not because you've done critical open-minded thinking and research, isn't that confirmation bias?

All I am saying bro is, you linked a snopes article that says he is not a nazi, then I showed you a video where he literally says he doesnt feel remorse for being a nazi and I just want to hear you say that snopes is wrong and that soros is a nazi.

I dont care about him either but I aint going to go around saying people who are nazis, arent nazis.

Daywolf
04-27-2017, 02:35 PM
Hey now if Kimmy were as smart as Soros, Kimmy would circulate a fake photo of himself and then immediately go to Snopes and write a debunk page while explaining how much of a nice guy Kimmy is. People would believe it :rolleyes:

Pokesan
04-27-2017, 02:45 PM
get this: rich guy is actually cartoonish villain

feigning outrage over this apparent revelation is the rights version of virtue signalling

mickmoranis
04-27-2017, 02:58 PM
What are you talking about poke? Whos outraged about soros? the only thing I ask is that democrats stop living and dying by whatever snopes says. Its not that hard to just be a little more middle of the road ya kno?

Pokesan
04-27-2017, 03:04 PM
What are you talking about poke? Whos outraged about soros? the only thing I ask is that democrats stop living and dying by whatever snopes says. Its not that hard to just be a little more middle of the road ya kno?

No. Long pig is looooooong.

loramin
04-27-2017, 04:30 PM
All I am saying bro is, you linked a snopes article that says he is not a nazi, then I showed you a video where he literally says he doesnt feel remorse for being a nazi and I just want to hear you say that snopes is wrong and that soros is a nazi.

I dont care about him either but I aint going to go around saying people who are nazis, arent nazis.

Right. It took me all of 2 minutes to type in "snopes.com" and then "soros nazi". That's as much effort as I'll put in, because I respect Snopes and they have a long track record of being impartial (and also I don't care about this Soros guy).

It's possible that Snopes, either intentionally or not, got that one wrong, and I admitted as much. But if you really care about convincing me that some dude I don't care about is a nazi when Snopes says he isn't, you're going to have to do more than just throw a 13 min video at me. At the very least you have to give me a timestamp of the good parts, and really you should also give me some sort of respected 3rd party source that backs up its authenticity.

Too many people on the internet are full of shit and anyone who blindly trusts any random internet site (Youtube video or otherwise) is a moron. The alternative to trusting everything is either to trust reliable 3rd parties (eg. Snopes), or investigate everything yourself, and I certainly don't have time to research every crackpot idea on the internet.

mickmoranis
04-27-2017, 04:43 PM
You.. Ok lora, dude, idk if you're trolling me but:

Right. It took me all of 2 minutes to type in "snopes.com" and then "soros nazi". That's as much effort as I'll put in, because I respect Snopes and they have a long track record of being impartial (and also I don't care about this Soros guy).

This link you provided only discredits wiether a picture is him or not, not if he is or isnt or was or wasnt a nazi.

Yet you use this to say, at best that hes 'probubly' not a nazi and at worst 'this link says hes not a nazi' which that link does not say at all.

It's possible that Snopes, either intentionally or not, got that one wrong, and I admitted as much. But if you really care about convincing me that some dude I don't care about is a nazi when Snopes says he isn't, you're going to have to do more than just throw a 13 min video at me. At the very least you have to give me a timestamp of the good parts, and really you should also give me some sort of respected 3rd party source that backs up its authenticity.

OK so, we're at the 'worst' case scenario.. you actually think the snopes link proves hes not a nazi, while a video of him saying he was a nazi and he feels no remorse for it, isnt enough for you to change your mind from flat out wrong, to right.

At the very least you have to give me a timestamp of the good parts, and really you should also give me some sort of respected 3rd party source that backs up its authenticity.

I literally typed the transcript in the post.

Too many people on the internet are full of shit and anyone who blindly trusts any random internet site (Youtube video or otherwise) is a moron. The alternative to trusting everything is either to trust reliable 3rd parties (eg. Snopes), or investigate everything yourself, and I certainly don't have time to research every crackpot idea on the internet.

You arent even reading the link you provide, you arent watching the one where it clearly in real time eradicates any argument you have, and you're blindly trusting that Snopes is right and the link I provided of video footage that shows soros saying was a nazi is wrong.

Sorry man but you're just flat out wrong on this one, you are 100% what you say is the problem in this post and I am 100% what you say the solution is, people not blindly following a website and believing.

Daywolf
04-27-2017, 05:49 PM
get this: rich guy is actually cartoonish villain

feigning outrage over this apparent revelation is the rights version of virtue signalling
This isn't some sudden revelation, Soros has been on the radar for a very long time as he does his thing. And that has been a LOT of things over the years.

Dude, you're posting using a questionable anti-semetic Trump avatar, yet Soros goes under the radar as being one of the main culprits of ZOG? ...if zog actually existed anyway. (((Long cat)))) has a new friend I guess. (((They're))) coming for you, poke's, run!

Of course Soros is all about himself, really.

loramin
04-27-2017, 06:50 PM
This link you provided only discredits wiether a picture is him or not, not if he is or isnt or was or wasnt a nazi.

Yet you use this to say, at best that hes 'probubly' not a nazi and at worst 'this link says hes not a nazi' which that link does not say at all.

You arent even reading the link you provide

/sigh

From that link I provided ...

As a prominent political activist and supporter of left-wing causes, Hungarian-born billionaire financier George Soros has frequently been the target of smear campaigns, none more ridiculous than the claim (which first surfaced in November 2016) that he served as an officer of the Schutzstaffel (SS) in Nazi Germany during World War II
....
As hoaxes go, this one was neither plausible nor hard to disprove. Given that Soros — born in 1930 — was only nine years old when World War II began and 14 when the war ended in Europe in 1945, he couldn’t have joined the SS, whose minimum age requirement was 17, even if he had wanted to. Moreover, Soros would never have met the SS requirement for pure “Aryan” heritage. Quite to the contrary, Soros grew to adolescence as a persecuted Jew in Nazi-occupied Budapest.

So nevermind that this guy is supposed to have been a nazi at age 14, despite being Jewish; Snopes was only talking about one picture, they're totally wrong!

But again, I have no dog in this game, and I don't care whether Soros was or wasn't a nazi. If Snopes said he was a nazi I'd believe he's a nazi (until proven otherwise)

I literally typed the transcript in the post.
That seems like a disincentive to watch it; why watch it when I can read your transcript?

I am 100% what you say the solution is, people not blindly following a website and believing.

... but you (blindly?) believe in a 14-year old Jewish nazi?

Pokesan
04-27-2017, 06:53 PM
This isn't some sudden revelation, Soros has been on the radar for a very long time as he does his thing. And that has been a LOT of things over the years.

Dude, you're posting using a questionable anti-semetic Trump avatar, yet Soros goes under the radar as being one of the main culprits of ZOG? ...if zog actually existed anyway. (((Long cat)))) has a new friend I guess. (((They're))) coming for you, poke's, run!

Of course Soros is all about himself, really.

context clues buddy!

maskedmelon
04-28-2017, 08:42 AM
By your logic we should sterilize libturds since their beliefs stifle innovation that would improve and prolong lives

most should be sterilized along with most[ everyone else, though I find their transgressions no more egregious than those of conservatives of the developed world. ordinary man embraces lunacy with wild abandon be he of the left or the right. his love is the bastard of profound loathing for the mental labor demanded of reason and the effortless gratification of placating his own conscience with convenient falsehoods. verily no man is beyond the beguiling idiocy of emotional validation.

Nilstoniakrath
04-28-2017, 10:11 PM
most should be sterilized along with most[ everyone else, though I find their transgressions no more egregious than those of conservatives of the developed world. ordinary man embraces lunacy with wild abandon be he of the left or the right. his love is the bastard of profound loathing for the mental labor demanded of reason and the effortless gratification of placating his own conscience with convenient falsehoods. verily no man is beyond the beguiling idiocy of emotional validation.

True. The world would be a much better place if some really smart person decided who was worthy of procreating and who should be sterilized. But the world is full of the progeny of morons, so I don't trust any elected official, or strongman who forced their way to power, to make those kind of decisions in an enlightened way. Just like I don't trust government to do much of anything, and that goes for Obama, Trump, Putin, Assad, Castro, Chavez, etc etc etc.

Sadre Spinegnawer
04-30-2017, 07:09 PM
We're gonna need a bigger gender boat...

http://i.imgur.com/Y8bJDQq.jpg

Nilstoniakrath
04-30-2017, 11:09 PM
We're gonna need a bigger gender boat...

http://i.imgur.com/Y8bJDQq.jpg

No offense meant, but...

What the F does a gender boat have to do with this thread?

Pokesan
04-30-2017, 11:43 PM
No offense meant, but...

What the F does a gender boat have to do with this thread?

have you tried cramming it up your ass?

Spyder73
05-01-2017, 08:55 AM
have you tried cramming it up your ass?

On a side note - the word "cramming" triggers me for some reason. Its just a weird word...cramming...

Nilstoniakrath
05-01-2017, 01:11 PM
have you tried cramming it up your ass?

Hate to break it to you, buttmonkey, but what your dad did to you is NOT normal behavior.

maskedmelonpai
05-01-2017, 02:41 PM
what a gender boat?? how it work? what it for?

why it go in you butt? or you mean the thread Pokes? put a thread up you butt? I think maybe boat get stuck if you do that. maybe it ok if you put it in sideways or something so it not go so far?? that why you said cram?

AzzarTheGod
05-01-2017, 05:25 PM
what a gender boat?? how it work? what it for?

why it go in you butt? or you mean the thread Pokes? put a thread up you butt? I think maybe boat get stuck if you do that. maybe it ok if you put it in sideways or something so it not go so far?? that why you said cram?

Idk but I hope uve been doing the exercises big J outlined for u if you're going to play with a gender boat

mickmoranis
05-01-2017, 05:27 PM
my child hood grew up, ignores politics, see's a TV personality on Netflix, wrongly mistakes THAT for politics, starts wars with their family over it.

Yes our generation is a pile of steaming shit.

entruil
05-01-2017, 06:14 PM
what a gender boat?? how it work? what it for?

have a feeling that i should be glad I didn't read past that but... here is what i thought of...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/River_crossing_puzzle