Trump terrorism speech

[big_ole_jpn]

You'll be hearing about this big speech (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2hptE3ewkD4) by the big Don. Worth looking into if you were curious what presidential-mode Donald would look like.

"In the old days, when we won a war, to the victor belonged the spoils." dude spitting flames.

[AzzarTheGod]

upboated. watching intently.

[Domo]

Where is his speech about his tax?

[AzzarTheGod]

Where is his speech about his tax?

Nowhere, because I don't think anyone is overly concerned with what Donald is worth.

The reason Hillary and others are pressuring for tax release is because the return will fall short of his self-valuation, or fail to show a complete valuation of his assets which include his brand.

Why does it matter if Trump is not worth exactly as much money as a verbal valuation he gave to the press? He was just making an impromptu estimate. It was not meant to be taken as gospel truth.

Now if he releases his tax, you will scream "LOOK HE LIED! HE IS POOR". When Hillary lies, no one cares and they celebrate her. When Donald Trump exaggerate his value a little bit, you are ready to pitchfork him. There is a double standard and Donald Trump knows this. Why does this matter?

The Don is not going to play this silly game. Hes worth a lot of money, and we can leave it at that. We don't need a tax return figure to pretend that he was dishonest about his self-valuation that he gave to the press.

[Domo]

I dont care if Trump is rich or poor, but I hope to see ther evidence that he dont pay the taxes that he should be.

[AzzarTheGod]

I dont care if Trump is rich or poor, but I hope to see ther evidence that he dont pay the taxes that he should be.

You won't see it because unfortunately the media intends to attack Trump over the fact that he is not worth as many billions as he stated in a verbal off-the-cuff estimate months ago.

Maybe we will get some partial tax return document, but full disclosure is highly unlikely in the face of liberal media bias. No reason to give them ammo.

[Domo]

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Cp1omUeUkAACRpb.jpg

[surron]

who cares what his tax returns say? he probably pays zilch just like other rich people who jump through loop holes do. what is releasing his tax returns going to do? why do you give a shit Domo, go jerk off Merkel.

[Baler]

I'm gonna rise up, I'm gonna kick a little ass, Gonna kick some ass in the USA, Gonna climb a mountain, Gonna sew a flag, Gonna fly on an Eagle, I'm gonna kick some butt, I'm gonna drive a big truck, I'm gonna rule this world, Gonna kick some ass, Gonna rise up, Kick a little ass, ROCK, FLAG AND EAGLE!

@Domo what the fuck do taxes have to do with kicking the shit out of people who want to kill you, your family and the people around you. There are people who cant even handle being on the p99 forums without freaking out. Just imagine what kind of nut jobs are out there gathering troops for violence.

[Spyder73]

who cares what his tax returns say?

The Dems care - makes Hillary look like less of a sociopath

[Nune]

Mr. Off-the-Cuff is really polishing up his rl shitposts these days. I like when he forgets patches and pauses and then says something super vague. "This guy killed 15 people alone, beat his wife.... and... other really super bad stuff guys"

[bdastomper58]

we're one poorly handled domestic attack away from Donny T sitting in the Oval

what a country!

[big_ole_jpn]

Mr. Off-the-Cuff is really polishing up his rl shitposts these days. I like when he forgets patches and pauses and then says something super vague. "This guy killed 15 people alone, beat his wife.... and... other really super bad stuff guys"

Actually he was being intentionally vague about some really profane shit the church beheaders did, not forgetting. You probably never heard about it because the news media was more concerned with how unconnected to Islam the attack was.

I love the way he chokes out LGB...T.......Q everytime he says it.

[JurisDictum]

You won't see it because unfortunately the media intends to attack Trump over the fact that he is not worth as many billions as he stated in a verbal off-the-cuff estimate months ago.

Maybe we will get some partial tax return document, but full disclosure is highly unlikely in the face of liberal media bias. No reason to give them ammo.

Fox does the same thing to liberals as MSNBC does to conservatives. I've never heard one say "well I can't release my tax returns because Fox is unfair about it."

You know hes not even conservative right? Here's a pro tip. If your one of the few conservatives that bash Donald now, in 3 years when any popularity he has built faded -- you'll be a good position.

Conservatives aren't just losing this election. Every one of those guys that stood next to the racist will be tarred over time. This is what Ryan knows and is trying to avoid spoiling for his own reputation (he obviously wants to run someday).

Just look at the polling: http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2016/president/us/general_election_trump_vs_clinton-5491.html

He doesn't have this...its getting worse for him not better. The e-mail scandal isn't going anywhere outside the republican tent. Neither isbringing up Monica again.

[Slathar]

Trump is 9.5:1 to win the race


AKA he is fucked


sorry u rednecks lost (gehehe)

[Slathar]

PS posting this from a casino at 2:37 PM and i am drunk

[JurisDictum]

Actually he was being intentionally vague about some really profane shit the church beheaders did, not forgetting. You probably never heard about it because the news media was more concerned with how unconnected to Islam the attack was.

I love the way he chokes out LGB...T.......Q everytime he says it.

Okay its entirely religious -- as in muslim -- problem, and its not really political.

Now that I admitted that we can....do the same thing we are planning to anyway...except for now some of our previous allies are mad at us for demonizing their religion...hmmm

Its just bullshit. It doesn't matter if Obama says "Muslim terrorest"...it really doesn't. Just a cheap shot by conservative media because they know racist Americans (their base) readily believe Obama is soft on Muslims.

[R Flair]

This was a foreign policy speech, not a "terrorism speech". Just wanted to point that out. But of course CNN thinks its a terrorism speech, because anyone willing to defend the US going after muslims must be branded a radical statesman and a global terrorist.

[Slathar]

This was a foreign policy speech, not a "terrorism speech". Just wanted to point that out. But of course CNN thinks its a terrorism speech, because anyone willing to defend the US going after muslims must be branded a radical statesman and a global terrorist.

pipe down hill billy. beat it. crawl back to your backwater shanty and get back to digging ditches.

[big_ole_jpn]

Where is his speech about his tax?

assuming you're talking about tax returns, not tax policy, but here we go.

tax returns probably reveal tax-evasion schemes like any super-rich individual must take advantage of if he intends to be competitive. Obviously this is irrelevant, but would still be really bad optics when trying to gain the vote of the completely retarded American electorate.

He's trying to win the vote of people who parrot talmudvision arguments like "but ur ties are made in China" when Don's whole persona is about the fact that he has played the game, seen how it's rigged against the American polity in favor of rich individuals, and wants to change it. To paraphrase, he had an obligation to his family and to his company to take advantage of these nasty wrinkles in the system. And if he uses the power he gained from that abuse to fix the system, is he not absolved?

His ingenious electioneering has him in a position where the more successful he was at being a douche in private life, the better he looks as a candidate, but this is the second layer of his persona only accessible to people who have a few brain cells active. There is a lot of plausibility to the idea that he's egomaniacal- and aware-enough of the big picture to act against his own financial interests in order to go down as a great US president, but you have to understand that the majority of USA is not thinking deeply enough to get even to here, and the television/redditsphere can't risk getting even that "intellectual" about the election in front of the debeaked peons so this has to remain an undercurrent.

Reaching the people who can't make it to layer 2 is what the first layer of the Trump public persona onion is for: the dogwhistling, the careful flirtation with racism, the lowbrow Rosie O'Donnell insults (okay I enjoyed those too actually). This is why layer-1 Democrat voters refer to Trump's base as idiot rednecks when he in fact has more crossover appeal than any Republican or Democrat candidate in most of these peoples' lifetimes.

Also as Azzar said, high probability that his self-valuation was high compared with his paper valuation. Another potentially annoying angle he doesn't want exposure to. In reality though, dude has been able to ride his brand and talent to a strong showing as an outsider in an American presidential election -- any thinking person will be willing to concede that his name is worth more than any tax statement will say. But, again, you must realize that layer 2 is not the important one.

[R Flair]

Its raining so I have the day off from ditch digging.

Whats your excuse? Don't you have some children to brainwash?

[JurisDictum]

assuming you're talking about tax returns, not tax policy, but here we go.

tax returns probably reveal tax-evasion schemes like any super-rich individual must take advantage of if he intends to be competitive. Obviously this is irrelevant, but would still be really bad optics when trying to gain the vote of the completely retarded American electorate.

He's trying to win the vote of people who parrot talmudvision arguments like "but ur ties are made in China" when Don's whole persona is about the fact that he has played the game, seen how it's rigged against the American polity in favor of rich individuals, and wants to change it. To paraphrase, he had an obligation to his family and to his company to take advantage of these nasty wrinkles in the system. And if he uses the power he gained from that abuse to fix the system, is he not absolved?

His ingenious electioneering has him in a position where the more successful he was at being a douche in private life, the better he looks as a candidate, but this is the second layer of his persona only accessible to people who have a few brain cells active. There is a lot of plausibility to the idea that he's egomaniacal- and aware-enough of the big picture to act against his own financial interests in order to go down as a great US president, but you have to understand that the majority of USA is not thinking deeply enough to get even to here, and the television/redditsphere can't risk getting even that "intellectual" about the election in front of the debeaked peons so this has to remain an undercurrent.

Reaching the people who can't make it to layer 2 is what the first layer of the Trump public persona onion is for: the dogwhistling, the careful flirtation with racism, the lowbrow Rosie O'Donnell insults (okay I enjoyed those too actually). This is why layer-1 Democrat voters refer to Trump's base as idiot rednecks when he in fact has more crossover appeal than any Republican or Democrat candidate in most of these peoples' lifetimes.

Also as Azzar said, high probability that his self-valuation was high compared with his paper valuation. Another potentially annoying angle he doesn't want exposure to. In reality though, dude has been able to ride his brand and talent to a strong showing as an outsider in an American presidential election -- any thinking person will be willing to concede that his name is worth more than any tax statement will say. But, again, you must realize that layer 2 is not the important one.

The only problem I have with your analysis, is your assumption of Trump's good will toward working people. To me, it seems that he wants to be president mostly because he is an egomanic that wants to be president. He's going the conservative race-baiting angle because that gets him votes. He talks about wealth inequality and immigration policy because that gets him votes.

All politicians priority number 1 is to stay in power. This trumps (no pun intended) any other consideration. The big question is, after they finish taking care of number 1, what else are they going to do with what little they can change?

It's possible he gets rid of loopholes and shady business practices. But honestly, I think his track record shows that he will only care about stuff like that as long as it makes him popular. Generally, going after any kind of shady business practice provokes attack adds and bought pundits to rail against you. So to me, it seems unlikely he would do much.

You have to keep in mind...Trump is cynical salesman at heart. He was never working class, and its very generous to consider him in anyway self made given that his fuckin dad was a rich developer just like him (although notably less rich). I don't see how anything in that background signals that he is "on our side" to any degree.

Conservatives mocked young democrats for falling for that hope and change shit Obama peddled. This isn't any different. Trump is full of cheap talk and no expensive signaling. This is just another frontier for him to conquer, and exploiting angry working/middle class white men is just the method of doing it.

Maybe not, maybe he does care. But to me that seems unlikely.

[R Flair]

Unlike Obama's change, the change that Trump is championing mostly to protect America from rising violence from within and without that Barry and Shillary are both working to create. They constantly fan the flames of faux-racism to create a crisis. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dialectic#Hegelian_dialectic)

Will he bring economic change? I don't know. He has some pretty simple plans to improve things but economic issues are of far less importance than those above. Without fixing that problem it will lead to events that will cause our economy and nation to fall regardless.

[Ahldagor]

Can Trump muster enough political credit, capitol to get something done? That's the underlying question. Congress holds the keys, and how a president works with them, without, or whether or not they will do anything determines what, if anything, can get done. Look at the trend of increasing executive orders over the past decades and how much congress actually works on anything. The cynical view I have of politicians leads me to thinking that regardless of the president, it's easier to point a finger in blame or stand beside a president in agreement rather than do anything difficult that may or may not hinder one's reelection.

[R Flair]

Maybe he won't get the support to get stuff done. Personally if he can actually defeat Hillary/left wing media/establishment/globalist and actually become president, I think it will create an even more widespread patriotic populist movement. Thats a huge if, but at that point anything is possible.

[mmmroo]

this entire election is a farce, just meditate and get good with the 4th.

[AzzarTheGod]

Maybe he won't get the support to get stuff done. Personally if he can actually defeat Hillary/left wing media/establishment/globalist and actually become president, I think it will create an even more widespread patriotic populist movement. Thats a huge if, but at that point anything is possible.

Yeah I don't think Trump has much of a chance. Everything legal to this point has indicated the fact that Hillary will win whether through the 4th branch (Media) or by election fraud.

Congress recommended charges for perjury and that's not going anywhere either. Again, another sign the way is paved and the light is green for Hillary (really Bill and Huma Abedin)

[R Flair]

Yeah I don't think Trump has much of a chance. Everything legal to this point has indicated the fact that Hillary will win whether through the 4th branch (Media) or by election fraud.

Congress recommended charges for perjury and that's not going anywhere either. Again, another sign the way is paved and the light is green for Hillary (really Bill and Huma Abedin)

Trump is already mobilizing a force to do independent exit polling. I'm guessing there will be many hundreds of people doing this as he continues to stress the importance of it.

Only problem with that is its backing them into a corner. Polls are obviously rigged as they're being used to condition people and corroborate a Hillary win in november. If hundreds, maybe thousands of people are prepared to watch precincts and take exit polls, this will leave them with no other choice but to take more... drastic action.

I really think democracy is done in this country. Don't see anyone becoming president at this point that isn't backed by the establishment.

[AzzarTheGod]

Trump is already mobilizing a force to do independent exit polling. I'm guessing there will be many hundreds of people doing this as he continues to stress the importance of it.

Only problem with that is its backing them into a corner. Polls are obviously rigged as they're being used to condition people and corroborate a Hillary win in november. If hundreds, maybe thousands of people are prepared to watch precincts and take exit polls, this will leave them with no other choice but to take more... drastic action.

I really think democracy is done in this country. Don't see anyone becoming president at this point that isn't backed by the establishment.

Our best shot was Jeb Bush.

Why do I say Jeb of all people? Because lets not forget George W. Bush never won a SINGLE Presidential election, nevermind two of them. He never won any election, ever. Just had to stress that again. John Kerry is on tape even admitting that he was likely to win the Presidency had he challenged him in court, but declined to do so for personal reasons.

Case in point? The establishment gets things done. GWB didn't need to win anything, he had the fraud in place, the establishment fix, and completely blew Gore and Kerry out with establishment muscle.

And Trump won't be getting any of that help no matter how bad the Pentagon wants him elected. The Pentagon isn't what it used to be in the 1930's-1970's anymore. Pentagon support no longer determines elections. There was a power shift sometime during the Reagan era and it was permanent.

[R Flair]

Jeb is a mess. (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w-McIdVuY88)

[Ahldagor]

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-politics/wp/2016/08/17/trump-reshuffles-staff-in-his-own-image/

Third campaign manager, direct link to Breitbart's chair who is now Trump's campaign CEO, and a new pollster for the campaign. Not looking good for the Trump Train.

[sOurDieSel]

No one would be surprised if Hitlery and her (((donors))) stole the election. She's Obama 2.0 on steroids. Under her reign the entire USA will look like Ferguson and Milwaukee.

Either way, Trump has changed America politics for the better. Cucks were talking about amnesty a year ago, now we are talking about deportations and a big wall. Thats a step in the right direction. As I have said before, burn baby burn, sit back and enjoy the show.

[Daywolf]

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-politics/wp/2016/08/17/trump-reshuffles-staff-in-his-own-image/

Third campaign manager, direct link to Breitbart's chair who is now Trump's campaign CEO, and a new pollster for the campaign. Not looking good for the Trump Train.That's some pretty thick drivel there in that lank. You really know how to pick 'em, eh? :D

Words seen on the page: "struggling" "crisis" "disaster" Hypocrisy" "unhappiness" and I only read about 1/3 the way through up to the Rick Wilson part who is one of the #nevertrump big leaders and a total globalist rino neocon has more in common on the issues with Hitllary. Seriously, lefty washingtonpost is going to run out of material and start re-regurgitating this stuff long before we even get to the first debate lol

As far as the Don doing some staff adjustments, we haven't even gotten to the first debate lol

[Ahldagor]

That's some pretty thick drivel there in that lank. You really know how to pick 'em, eh? :D

Words seen on the page: "struggling" "crisis" "disaster" Hypocrisy" "unhappiness" and I only read about 1/3 the way through up to the Rick Wilson part who is one of the #nevertrump big leaders and a total globalist rino neocon has more in common on the issues with Hitllary. Seriously, lefty washingtonpost is going to run out of material and start re-regurgitating this stuff long before we even get to the first debate lol

As far as the Don doing some staff adjustments, we haven't even gotten to the first debate lol

Stay on topic please. His campaign isn't being run well and management shake ups like that suggest instability. A stable campaign, organizationally speaking, helps a lot at that level. InB4 your standard out of context babbling.

[Daywolf]

Stay on topic please. His campaign isn't being run well and management shake ups like that suggest instability. A stable campaign, organizationally speaking, helps a lot at that level. InB4 your standard out of context babbling.
Me babbling and off topic? You hitting the sauce early or somethin?
I flamed out your link directly, on what it said, it's context, the way it's presented from the article, it's obvious hard spin opinion. You should make a thread "agree with all my awesomeness or you're off topic".

I mean really, these are the guys with the establishment crowd. These are the globalists and their perpetual wars as they undermine our sovereignty by slight of hand. They want these wars, they neeeed these wars. Sad thing is, damage is already done, may be no turning back and best we can do is shore up our defenses as we watch the world melt away. You think it won't? all the dems and reps have fought over the past two decade is who gets to be the architect of Armageddon, though both with the same drafts.

[Secrets]

jeb is a mess.

donald trump's slogan versus jeb bush's slogan: there's a difference between 'please clap' and 'make america great again'

[Ahldagor]

Me babbling and off topic? You hitting the sauce early or somethin?
I flamed out your link directly, on what it said, it's context, the way it's presented from the article, it's obvious hard spin opinion. You should make a thread "agree with all my awesomeness or you're off topic".

I mean really, these are the guys with the establishment crowd. These are the globalists and their perpetual wars as they undermine our sovereignty by slight of hand. They want these wars, they neeeed these wars. Sad thing is, damage is already done, may be no turning back and best we can do is shore up our defenses as we watch the world melt away. You think it won't? all the dems and reps have fought over the past two decade is who gets to be the architect of Armageddon, though both with the same drafts.

How does orchestrating Armageddon from the book of The Revelation of St. John have any relation to the management of Trump's campaign? That's the babbling I was referring to, and how you don't stay on topic. It takes a lot of mental gymnastics to start at campaign management and end up with the final battle between good and evil before the day of judgement as presented in the Christian religion.

[entruil]

How does orchestrating Armageddon from the book of The Revelation of St. John have any relation to the management of Trump's campaign?

well... hmm.ahem.. aagheagm....

failures of truth... *cough *cough... ahegmmm..ggmmgmg... mmh...

people create their own fate... the signs of the world from the world will be there and right but self justifying and self glorifying... how do u find out a thief~!? u wake up and your shit's gone! anything we percieve to be cause/effect is so far gone from the fabric of reality... gl be safe safe hunting thx for sow yes this place spawn good named acceptable destruction etc... *sip *cough *cough

[Daywolf]

How does orchestrating Armageddon from the book of The Revelation of St. John have any relation to the management of Trump's campaign? That's the babbling I was referring to, and how you don't stay on topic. It takes a lot of mental gymnastics to start at campaign management and end up with the final battle between good and evil before the day of judgement as presented in the Christian religion.
Hmm? I didn't mention John. Oh my oh my, I went and said something Western of me, and Ahld got all into an up in arms fervor, imagined off topic chatter, want's to turn it into some religious battle with lots of attempted shaming. Well lets see what the Dic says so to amuse your brain pan:
http://www.dictionary.com/browse/armageddon
Armageddon
[ahr-muh-ged-n]
noun
1.
the place where the final battle will be fought between the forces of good and evil (probably so called in reference to the battlefield of Megiddo. Rev. 16:16).
2.
the last and completely destructive battle:
The arms race can lead to Armageddon.
3.
any great and crucial conflict.

Some examples there:
With the DR-Congo now Ebola-stricken, fears of an Armageddon are rising.

Someone has to say it: cable news was utterly swept away by the notion that Irene would turn out to be Armageddon.

“I will apologize for Armageddon, because we had to do the whole movie in 16 weeks,” he was quoted as saying.



Well that's true on 1, it's a word created on the concept of a battle or future battle at Megiddo. Megiddo is in the middle-east, and fun fact off the top of my head, Megiddo has seen more battles to date than any other battlefield in the world. Another really fun fact, Armageddon isn't even in the bible or in the book of "St. John", not unless you have a Latin translated book. What you are actually referring to is "Har-Magedon" which as it reads in my book. The great battle of Har-Magedon, I think you are attributing to my post. It's the battle where Yashua returns and stops before all people are wiped out off the face of the planet by their war.

But then there is 2. I don't see anything about "Christian Religion" in that one. Not on 3 either... where did you read about John and Revelation in my quote? Do I need a special filter or something?? I don't like running extra processes, I keep my system as minimalistic as possible. Maybe you saw it in that Bruce Willis movie... what was the name of that movie again? hmmm... maybe it'll come to mind later.

But yeah, it's used pretty ambiguously here in the West. 3 is probably the most accurate to the Latin word, just as much as there are a lot of problems with the Latin translations which is primarily used by the Catholic church. It's funny too since Catholicism doesn't even recognize Revelation as a canonized book. Yet ironically they accept such as the Song of Solomon which imo shouldn't be. Then some other books, Belle and the Dragon or whatever. ...oh wait that's a restaurant... um oh no wait, google says it's a book too :D But at least some of them take the Book of Enoch seriously. Very good read for those that read/studied all the canonized books and wanting something interesting to read in addition.

Anyhoot you missed the point, I said between dems and reps for decades, not Trump. I'm talking about the establishment elite, while the Don is very much on the outside. I mean really, the top of the pyramid elites want real Armageddon, not the one of the bible that gets stopped, but Total Annihilation (not the game, before you start...) where once humanity has been wiped out, they think they will be free to reincarnate as slugs and worms or whatever. It's all very Saturn, really though. But all the puppets dance, and the mechanical robots follow.

How is it relevant? In many ways. https://www.amazon.com/Armageddon-How-Trump-Beat-Hillary/dp/1630060585
Also it's a clear fact that a vote for Hillary is a vote for one of the top puppets leading you to your death, clearly a campaign decision. These globalist elites are not a box of kittens, but a pit of vipers. Hillary IS Wall-street and as corrupt as they come ... though lol can't even give correct insider trading info to her son-in-law and winds up losing a fortune. Hey, but they are all made of money anyway, yours. They luv the shiat, gives them the means to steal power as they digest the kittens that fell into their pit.

edit: oh and to mention, the topic is actually about Trump on the terrorism thing, not your silly link. The Islamisists are into the final battle thing too, one big old massive war. You cant have a realistic convo about Islamic state terrorism without mentioning their main motivation; to start an Armageddon to bring their Mahdi out of the well. If you don't understand the major religions of the earth for what they really teach, you have no playbook and are clueless so to be easily led by the elites. Everything revolves around a religion of some sorts, even to those that claim none.

[big_ole_jpn]

Hmm? I didn't mention John. Oh my oh my, I went and said something Western of me, and Ahld got all into an up in arms fervor, imagined off topic chatter, want's to turn it into some religious battle with lots of attempted shaming. Well lets see what the Dic says so to amuse your brain pan:
http://www.dictionary.com/browse/armageddon
Armageddon
[ahr-muh-ged-n]
noun
1.
the place where the final battle will be fought between the forces of good and evil (probably so called in reference to the battlefield of Megiddo. Rev. 16:16).
2.
the last and completely destructive battle:
The arms race can lead to Armageddon.
3.
any great and crucial conflict.

Some examples there:
With the DR-Congo now Ebola-stricken, fears of an Armageddon are rising.

Someone has to say it: cable news was utterly swept away by the notion that Irene would turn out to be Armageddon.

“I will apologize for Armageddon, because we had to do the whole movie in 16 weeks,” he was quoted as saying.



Well that's true on 1, it's a word created on the concept of a battle or future battle at Megiddo. Megiddo is in the middle-east, and fun fact off the top of my head, Megiddo has seen more battles to date than any other battlefield in the world. Another really fun fact, Armageddon isn't even in the bible or in the book of "St. John", not unless you have a Latin translated book. What you are actually referring to is "Har-Magedon" which as it reads in my book. The great battle of Har-Magedon, I think you are attributing to my post. It's the battle where Yashua returns and stops before all people are wiped out off the face of the planet by their war.

But then there is 2. I don't see anything about "Christian Religion" in that one. Not on 3 either... where did you read about John and Revelation in my quote? Do I need a special filter or something?? I don't like running extra processes, I keep my system as minimalistic as possible. Maybe you saw it in that Bruce Willis movie... what was the name of that movie again? hmmm... maybe it'll come to mind later.

But yeah, it's used pretty ambiguously here in the West. 3 is probably the most accurate to the Latin word, just as much as there are a lot of problems with the Latin translations which is primarily used by the Catholic church. It's funny too since Catholicism doesn't even recognize Revelation as a canonized book. Yet ironically they accept such as the Song of Solomon which imo shouldn't be. Then some other books, Belle and the Dragon or whatever. ...oh wait that's a restaurant... um oh no wait, google says it's a book too :D But at least some of them take the Book of Enoch seriously. Very good read for those that read/studied all the canonized books and wanting something interesting to read in addition.

Anyhoot you missed the point, I said between dems and reps for decades, not Trump. I'm talking about the establishment elite, while the Don is very much on the outside. I mean really, the top of the pyramid elites want real Armageddon, not the one of the bible that gets stopped, but Total Annihilation (not the game, before you start...) where once humanity has been wiped out, they think they will be free to reincarnate as slugs and worms or whatever. It's all very Saturn, really though. But all the puppets dance, and the mechanical robots follow.

How is it relevant? In many ways. https://www.amazon.com/Armageddon-How-Trump-Beat-Hillary/dp/1630060585
Also it's a clear fact that a vote for Hillary is a vote for one of the top puppets leading you to your death, clearly a campaign decision. These globalist elites are not a box of kittens, but a pit of vipers. Hillary IS Wall-street and as corrupt as they come ... though lol can't even give correct insider trading info to her son-in-law and winds up losing a fortune. Hey, but they are all made of money anyway, yours. They luv the shiat, gives them the means to steal power as they digest the kittens that fell into their pit.

edit: oh and to mention, the topic is actually about Trump on the terrorism thing, not your silly link. The Islamisists are into the final battle thing too, one big old massive war. You cant have a realistic convo about Islamic state terrorism without mentioning their main motivation; to start an Armageddon to bring their Mahdi out of the well. If you don't understand the major religions of the earth for what they really teach, you have no playbook and are clueless so to be easily led by the elites. Everything revolves around a religion of some sorts, even to those that claim none.

agreed

[Ahldagor]

Hmm? I didn't mention John. Oh my oh my, I went and said something Western of me, and Ahld got all into an up in arms fervor, imagined off topic chatter, want's to turn it into some religious battle with lots of attempted shaming. Well lets see what the Dic says so to amuse your brain pan:
http://www.dictionary.com/browse/armageddon
Armageddon
[ahr-muh-ged-n]
noun
1.
the place where the final battle will be fought between the forces of good and evil (probably so called in reference to the battlefield of Megiddo. Rev. 16:16).
2.
the last and completely destructive battle:
The arms race can lead to Armageddon.
3.
any great and crucial conflict.

Some examples there:
With the DR-Congo now Ebola-stricken, fears of an Armageddon are rising.

Someone has to say it: cable news was utterly swept away by the notion that Irene would turn out to be Armageddon.

“I will apologize for Armageddon, because we had to do the whole movie in 16 weeks,” he was quoted as saying.



Well that's true on 1, it's a word created on the concept of a battle or future battle at Megiddo. Megiddo is in the middle-east, and fun fact off the top of my head, Megiddo has seen more battles to date than any other battlefield in the world. Another really fun fact, Armageddon isn't even in the bible or in the book of "St. John", not unless you have a Latin translated book. What you are actually referring to is "Har-Magedon" which as it reads in my book. The great battle of Har-Magedon, I think you are attributing to my post. It's the battle where Yashua returns and stops before all people are wiped out off the face of the planet by their war.

But then there is 2. I don't see anything about "Christian Religion" in that one. Not on 3 either... where did you read about John and Revelation in my quote? Do I need a special filter or something?? I don't like running extra processes, I keep my system as minimalistic as possible. Maybe you saw it in that Bruce Willis movie... what was the name of that movie again? hmmm... maybe it'll come to mind later.

But yeah, it's used pretty ambiguously here in the West. 3 is probably the most accurate to the Latin word, just as much as there are a lot of problems with the Latin translations which is primarily used by the Catholic church. It's funny too since Catholicism doesn't even recognize Revelation as a canonized book. Yet ironically they accept such as the Song of Solomon which imo shouldn't be. Then some other books, Belle and the Dragon or whatever. ...oh wait that's a restaurant... um oh no wait, google says it's a book too :D But at least some of them take the Book of Enoch seriously. Very good read for those that read/studied all the canonized books and wanting something interesting to read in addition.

Anyhoot you missed the point, I said between dems and reps for decades, not Trump. I'm talking about the establishment elite, while the Don is very much on the outside. I mean really, the top of the pyramid elites want real Armageddon, not the one of the bible that gets stopped, but Total Annihilation (not the game, before you start...) where once humanity has been wiped out, they think they will be free to reincarnate as slugs and worms or whatever. It's all very Saturn, really though. But all the puppets dance, and the mechanical robots follow.

How is it relevant? In many ways. https://www.amazon.com/Armageddon-How-Trump-Beat-Hillary/dp/1630060585
Also it's a clear fact that a vote for Hillary is a vote for one of the top puppets leading you to your death, clearly a campaign decision. These globalist elites are not a box of kittens, but a pit of vipers. Hillary IS Wall-street and as corrupt as they come ... though lol can't even give correct insider trading info to her son-in-law and winds up losing a fortune. Hey, but they are all made of money anyway, yours. They luv the shiat, gives them the means to steal power as they digest the kittens that fell into their pit.

edit: oh and to mention, the topic is actually about Trump on the terrorism thing, not your silly link. The Islamisists are into the final battle thing too, one big old massive war. You cant have a realistic convo about Islamic state terrorism without mentioning their main motivation; to start an Armageddon to bring their Mahdi out of the well. If you don't understand the major religions of the earth for what they really teach, you have no playbook and are clueless so to be easily led by the elites. Everything revolves around a religion of some sorts, even to those that claim none.

Lol, you lost the game beyond recognition (I suspected as much). Serious gymnastics. Gold medal worthy. You still haven't answered the question in regards to Trump's campaign.

[Daywolf]

Lol, you lost the game beyond recognition (I suspected as much). Serious gymnastics. Gold medal worthy. You still haven't answered the question in regards to Trump's campaign.
Gymnastics what? I at least touched on the actual topic here, where you are waaay off from. But as for his campaign, it's simple; get rid of the guy advising him to tone it down a notch, so to bring in someone ready for all out war against Hitllary, Trump style, as the first debate approaches. Now if your lank had been posted in the middle of the debates, it might have some merit if true.

You want to talk tactics, but you realize the Clinton media lapdogs posting that humor is only raising awareness of just how dumb they really are? They are reaching and with no substance, rotten timing, and only the hardened Clinton supporter is gobbling it up no questions asked. She can't even successfully lead the media, how could she ever lead America? heh likely blame the Russians™

[stormlord]

Don has no talent or anything to offer us. The only thing he's good at is making a bad deal look just enough. All his life he's survived on his lies and pandering and on family and friends. He's self-obsessed too. If he wins, it's likely no other president in history has a lower IQ.

Don't vote for him. Don't be another foool.

Watch this--it's about Trump's qualifications:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yb2NHTka-gw
As I listened earlier to Ted Cruz and all those comments he made it really sent a chill up my spine because his analysis of Trump's character is remarkably accurate and fiercely negative.
Donald Trump has no intention of being anyone's savior, but his own.

http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2016/07/25/donald-trumps-ghostwriter-tells-all
“Trump has been written about a thousand ways from Sunday, but this fundamental aspect of who he is doesn’t seem to be fully understood,” Schwartz told me. “It’s implicit in a lot of what people write, but it’s never explicit—or, at least, I haven’t seen it. And that is that it’s impossible to keep him focussed on any topic, other than his own self-aggrandizement, for more than a few minutes, and even then . . . ” Schwartz trailed off, shaking his head in amazement. He regards Trump’s inability to concentrate as alarming in a Presidential candidate. “If he had to be briefed on a crisis in the Situation Room, it’s impossible to imagine him paying attention over a long period of time,” he said.

Tony Schwartz:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tony_Schwartz_%28author%29
In July 2016, Schwartz was the subject of an article in The New Yorker in which he describes Donald Trump, who was running for President of the United States at the time, highly unfavorably, and how he came to regret writing The Art of the Deal.[2][10][11] Schwartz repeated his criticism on Good Morning America, saying he "put lipstick on a pig", and again on Real Time with Bill Maher.

[big_ole_jpn]

Don has no talent

he's good at is making a bad deal look good.

[Sidelle]

Don has no talent or anything to offer us. The only thing he's good at is making a bad deal look just enough. All his life he's survived on his lies and pandering and on family and friends. He's self-obsessed too. If he wins, it's likely no other president in history has a lower IQ.

Don't vote for him. Don't be another foool.
So if Trump voters are fools, what would you call a Hillary voter?

[Whirled]

what would you call a Hillary voter?

A Sarnak Zealot? Or perhaps Sheeple

[Sage Truthbearer]

Hmm? I didn't mention John. Oh my oh my, I went and said something Western of me, and Ahld got all into an up in arms fervor, imagined off topic chatter, want's to turn it into some religious battle with lots of attempted shaming. Well lets see what the Dic says so to amuse your brain pan:
http://www.dictionary.com/browse/armageddon
Armageddon
[ahr-muh-ged-n]
noun
1.
the place where the final battle will be fought between the forces of good and evil (probably so called in reference to the battlefield of Megiddo. Rev. 16:16).
2.
the last and completely destructive battle:
The arms race can lead to Armageddon.
3.
any great and crucial conflict.

Some examples there:
With the DR-Congo now Ebola-stricken, fears of an Armageddon are rising.

Someone has to say it: cable news was utterly swept away by the notion that Irene would turn out to be Armageddon.

“I will apologize for Armageddon, because we had to do the whole movie in 16 weeks,” he was quoted as saying.



Well that's true on 1, it's a word created on the concept of a battle or future battle at Megiddo. Megiddo is in the middle-east, and fun fact off the top of my head, Megiddo has seen more battles to date than any other battlefield in the world. Another really fun fact, Armageddon isn't even in the bible or in the book of "St. John", not unless you have a Latin translated book. What you are actually referring to is "Har-Magedon" which as it reads in my book. The great battle of Har-Magedon, I think you are attributing to my post. It's the battle where Yashua returns and stops before all people are wiped out off the face of the planet by their war.

But then there is 2. I don't see anything about "Christian Religion" in that one. Not on 3 either... where did you read about John and Revelation in my quote? Do I need a special filter or something?? I don't like running extra processes, I keep my system as minimalistic as possible. Maybe you saw it in that Bruce Willis movie... what was the name of that movie again? hmmm... maybe it'll come to mind later.

But yeah, it's used pretty ambiguously here in the West. 3 is probably the most accurate to the Latin word, just as much as there are a lot of problems with the Latin translations which is primarily used by the Catholic church. It's funny too since Catholicism doesn't even recognize Revelation as a canonized book. Yet ironically they accept such as the Song of Solomon which imo shouldn't be. Then some other books, Belle and the Dragon or whatever. ...oh wait that's a restaurant... um oh no wait, google says it's a book too :D But at least some of them take the Book of Enoch seriously. Very good read for those that read/studied all the canonized books and wanting something interesting to read in addition.

Anyhoot you missed the point, I said between dems and reps for decades, not Trump. I'm talking about the establishment elite, while the Don is very much on the outside. I mean really, the top of the pyramid elites want real Armageddon, not the one of the bible that gets stopped, but Total Annihilation (not the game, before you start...) where once humanity has been wiped out, they think they will be free to reincarnate as slugs and worms or whatever. It's all very Saturn, really though. But all the puppets dance, and the mechanical robots follow.

How is it relevant? In many ways. https://www.amazon.com/Armageddon-How-Trump-Beat-Hillary/dp/1630060585
Also it's a clear fact that a vote for Hillary is a vote for one of the top puppets leading you to your death, clearly a campaign decision. These globalist elites are not a box of kittens, but a pit of vipers. Hillary IS Wall-street and as corrupt as they come ... though lol can't even give correct insider trading info to her son-in-law and winds up losing a fortune. Hey, but they are all made of money anyway, yours. They luv the shiat, gives them the means to steal power as they digest the kittens that fell into their pit.

edit: oh and to mention, the topic is actually about Trump on the terrorism thing, not your silly link. The Islamisists are into the final battle thing too, one big old massive war. You cant have a realistic convo about Islamic state terrorism without mentioning their main motivation; to start an Armageddon to bring their Mahdi out of the well. If you don't understand the major religions of the earth for what they really teach, you have no playbook and are clueless so to be easily led by the elites. Everything revolves around a religion of some sorts, even to those that claim none.

I didn't read a word of this, but I can still confidently state that it's the unhinged ramblings of a mentally unstable person.

[Jarnauga]

So if Trump voters are fools, what would you call a Hillary voter?

i really don't think people are voting for clinton, they're voting against trump

[maskedmelon]

i really don't think people are voting for clinton, they're voting against trump

This. Trump is man of arrogance hurtful words. People don't like mean people.

[bdastomper58]

i really don't think people are voting for clinton, they're voting against trump

that would be a misguided half measure as a vote FOR trump is a vote AGAINST both major parties.

people are more clever than you estimate

clinton has very similar unfavorablity ratings as T-dawg

[entruil]

This. Trump is man of arrogance hurtful words. People don't like mean people.

victomology tactics apparently are pretty effective ...


as for voting against trump.... bad time to do that by voting for hillary... but i guess that depends on how you twist the bill of rights to suit your own desires and perspective...

When she wins and is pardoned and they crown her after they get the device out of the "money pit" in nova scotia the term "Nanny State" will take on a whole new meaning

[Daywolf]

This. Trump is man of arrogance hurtful words. People don't like mean people.
Mean at who? I have yet to be personally offended by the guy. In fact a lot of the stuff he's saying (actually saying apart from the lefts fantasy spin) is what we have been feeling for a long time, angry about, as well as trying to push back against it all but in frustrating futility. Even in his 2000 run, he was saying a lot of the same stuff, and now he is even better at it as he seems to have kept on his research. But nobody likes "mean people", since when?

I don't view him any meaner than George Carlin, just not as funny at it. Some people downright hated Carlin, one mean mofo (https://youtu.be/qYOH30WUX7Y), at least if they disagreed with what he was saying. And I disagreed with Carlin on many points, but generally agreed with his direction, even if presented in the contextual wrappings of humor. As far as for the Don, all good as far as I'm concerned. He's mean to the people that deserve to be mean to, and often in context more mean than him.

What some are seeing is how the Clinton news network is painting him. And it's easy to fall into that, those brief well edited video clips, for those on the lazy side of doing their research, looking at both sides, all three sides, sideways, digging for the source material that sometimes I even need to use something other than google to find as they make it more difficult to find.

And arrogance isn't always just arrogance, but can be self-confidence, or even confidence in others on behalf of them. If you followed the last election, look how pliable Mitt was. That was a disaster, as I knew it would be before he even got the nomination. Look at McCain, that's one arrogant bastard, every other word of his offends me. I remember him admitting after his failed run how he didn't try hard enough. That's because it was all about him and if 0bama got elected it wouldn't effect him but even give him opportunity to just go along with 0bama and vote on legislation in his favor.

The Don is up there actually trying, while not only fighting against the lefts spin, but as well the attacks by the RINO neocons that are determined to see Hillary be president, including Cruz. All any of them have is 'What if's' (fear mongering) against him, while Clinton has been caught red handed time and time again, and while these RINO's have been repulsive too. Hell, if I were running, I'd be a lot 'meaner'. I'm pissed at these people, and I hope they go down in flames. Some of the crimes they have committed they should have been locked up for - even years ago. Yet everyone else does the time (http://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2016-08-19/sailor-denied-clinton-deal-gets-1-year-in-prison-for-6-photos-of-sub), and deservingly so, but these people have put themselves above us, which is the actual opposite of how this great nation was founded.

[maskedmelon]

Well, it's the reason most people are voting for Clinton. As much as people try to spin it as being about policy, the entire election cycle is about Trump's personality and whether you are for or against it. Personally, I'd rather be led by an asshole who is eager to destroy other assholes than one looking to sell mine to the highest bidder. We need fewer assholes in the world ^^

[R Flair]

An endangered asshole is a compelling reason to vote Trump.

[Metalopolis]

Fox does the same thing to liberals as MSNBC does to conservatives. I've never heard one say "well I can't release my tax returns because Fox is unfair about it."

You know hes not even conservative right? Here's a pro tip. If your one of the few conservatives that bash Donald now, in 3 years when any popularity he has built faded -- you'll be a good position.

Conservatives aren't just losing this election. Every one of those guys that stood next to the racist will be tarred over time. This is what Ryan knows and is trying to avoid spoiling for his own reputation (he obviously wants to run someday).

Just look at the polling: http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2016/president/us/general_election_trump_vs_clinton-5491.html

He doesn't have this...its getting worse for him not better. The e-mail scandal isn't going anywhere outside the republican tent. Neither isbringing up Monica again.

Yes the conservatives have Fox News.

Meanwhile the libtards have: ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, MSNBC and more. This is why there's no reporting of the email scandal.

Even recent email findings by judicial watch, for example, detailing how heads of state were donating millions of dollars to the Clinton Foundation within months, weeks, or even days of contacting Hillary's State Dept. via private email channels.

Yeah. Nothin' fishy there at all right?

[Oldschoolplayer]

Actions speak louder than words

[R Flair]

Fox news is moving left at an alarming rate. Think I caught 4 clips from them this week, and all of them were disgusting.

[AzzarTheGod]

Fox news is moving left at an alarming rate. Think I caught 4 clips from them this week, and all of them were disgusting.

cite an example.

u think its true they wanted Ailes out to make Fox more of a left network for "mass appeal" ?

[R Flair]

I don't think they ever want to be viewed as "left", I just think its the underlying goal to move the right further left (should be obv at this point).

Other than Hannity and 1 or 2 others, none of them really support Trump. They very clearly want to mock him and push people to the other side.

[R Flair]

Ok, here is one off drudge right now.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/08/20/clintons-health-continues-to-spur-controversy-and-conspiracy.html

Its always subtle, but health issues have long been a concern for voters. These people act like this is something new - like they were born yesterday or something. This was a massive issue with McCain just a few years ago, and now even cuckservatives are playing off real health issues with a candidate who is observably not well.

[AzzarTheGod]

Ok, here is one off drudge right now.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/08/20/clintons-health-continues-to-spur-controversy-and-conspiracy.html

Its always subtle, but health issues have long been a concern for voters. These people act like this is something new - like they were born yesterday or something. This was a massive issue with McCain just a few years ago, and now even cuckservatives are playing off real health issues with a candidate who is observably not well.

Wow yeah that's sad. I guess Clinton was serious when she said she wanted Breitbart destroyed.

Fox is staying on her good side. She is very powerful.

[R Flair]

Ok, one more I just came across.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/08/18/dont-kid-yourself-polls-are-usually-right.html

This is just overtly dishonest. Polls haven't "usually" been right in a long time. Looks at polls for clinton bernie (clinton was always up in popular vote, yet bernie trounced her). Look at Brexit (polls showed 3x the support for staying).

They ask their "experts" has there ever been a poll in modern history that, two weeks out, didn't predict the outcome. Of course, these "experts" aren't even aware of primary polls a matter of weeks ago, that were off by over 21 points...

Beyond that, many places are showing the candidates neck and neck this week. Unless they are working some reverse psychology angle (dishonest), they are outright lying about the current state of affairs even in polling which has become increasingly inaccurate in the last decade.

http://www.latimes.com/politics/
http://cesrusc.org/election/

[Daywolf]

Hardly Anyone Trusts The Media Anymore (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/trust-in-media_us_57148543e4b06f35cb6fec58)
"Only 6 percent of people say they have a great deal of confidence in the press"

[R Flair]

That 6% figure is telling, but until people stop reading, stop watching, and stop clicking, they are just hypocrites. That said, media ratings are falling so time will tell.

[Daywolf]

That 6% figure is telling, but until people stop reading, stop watching, and stop clicking, they are just hypocrites. That said, media ratings are falling so time will tell.
And that was 4 months ago. Since then didn't they change the polling formula? Must have changed to 94% with a great deal of confidence, now.

[bdastomper58]

gosh the people who've correctly predicted the last two think hillary is gonna annihilate the trumpster

http://i.imgur.com/rnrEPfB.png

what a bunch cucks !

[big_ole_jpn]

That 6% figure is telling, but until people stop reading, stop watching, and stop clicking, they are just hypocrites. That said, media ratings are falling so time will tell.

Seems like an exciting statistic, but problem is that 90% of those 94% still don't recognize simulated socialization hubs like Reddit are television 2.0 yet, and regard widespread astroturfing, upboat-downboat manipulation on cancer sites with their own internal fiat shekel system, etc as tinfoil. "New" media and old media (owned by the same people) are playing good cop bad cop with our collective psyche. Mistrust of the press isn't nearly a deep enough skepticism to indicate wokeness.

[entruil]

Seems like an exciting statistic, but problem is that 90% of those 94% still don't recognize

i won't underestimate how many people watch/listen waiting for the truth... Trump really speaks same language as a lot of people for good or for bad... these people have been quiet and working hard for a long time expecting the government that they consented to be governed by to get their shit together and have been willing to take lumps with everyone to get through...

because of this they are racist/sexist/classist/ridiculed by haters....

the 2nd ammendment statement that was blown out of proportion are the words that the language aligns with the most...

the Declaration of Independance was real and we are nowhere near there, however, it should be read by all...


weee decided to not delete this and hit submit reply ... gl

[R Flair]

gosh the people who've correctly predicted the last two think hillary is gonna annihilate the trumpster

http://i.imgur.com/rnrEPfB.png

what a bunch cucks !

Wonder if they will retire after trump-train runs hillary over in november.

going to guess totally shameless like their fake chart

[AzzarTheGod]

Seems like an exciting statistic, but problem is that 90% of those 94% still don't recognize simulated socialization hubs like Reddit are television 2.0 yet, and regard widespread astroturfing, upboat-downboat manipulation on cancer sites with their own internal fiat shekel system, etc as tinfoil. "New" media and old media (owned by the same people) are playing good cop bad cop with our collective psyche. Mistrust of the press isn't nearly a deep enough skepticism to indicate wokeness.

Reddit makes me really sick when I have to visit it for information on a question. I see why ppl like us continue to post here regardless of lack of content/posters and (((Lune))) becoming a no good piece of shit [REDACTED]. You can only read so much turd and Talmud cock-swallowing.

Good post by the way, spot on. As you said, mistrust of the media isn't indicative of anything. You need closer to full-on hatred of the media in order to evoke any meaningful change.

Skepticism is just a word. Skeptics still subscribe and like the media when they like it, it just means they disagree with it when they disagree with it. That's not good enough. Mistrust is not a factor.

[JurisDictum]

Yes the conservatives have Fox News.

Meanwhile the libtards have: ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, MSNBC and more. This is why there's no reporting of the email scandal.

Even recent email findings by judicial watch, for example, detailing how heads of state were donating millions of dollars to the Clinton Foundation within months, weeks, or even days of contacting Hillary's State Dept. via private email channels.

Yeah. Nothin' fishy there at all right?

My perspective is there all fishy, and your naive if you think any of them are different than Clinton when it comes down to it. They just haven't been around as long.

But you notice your list is made up of corporate owned media? The mainstream media has a Liberal bias as in liberal market economy along with social liberalism..there's a huge difference between ABC and the real American left wing perspective you get in colleges and non-corporate sources (The Nation, Democracy NOW).

Conservatives think there alone in getting their message twisted and hijacked by an establishment in their party/DC. The same thing happens in the Democrat party. Most of those networks you list basically peddle the idea that we can't afford things like universal healthcare and education. Meanwhile many countries with less GPD per capita have these things. It has been proven that owners (producers) of media intervene in programing a lot...which balances out the liberal editor bias usually (a majority of producers are conservative).

[Daywolf]

peddle the idea
http://i.imgur.com/cQrMw.gif