Maniacal Strength Buff Icon Typo

[Victorio]

Buff icon should say Maniacal Strength, per the spell, but it says Manicial Strength instead

[Zaela]

It's a classic (http://www.project1999.com/forums/showthread.php?t=156836&highlight=Manicial), and therefore intended (http://www.project1999.com/forums/showthread.php?t=182096&highlight=Manicial), typo.

[Crashking]

I can't help but laugh. I'm sitting here thinking to myself, if it was correct on live.. even if it took forever and we know its wrong - why not fix it like it should have been done. I can see the idea of providing a classic experience but does something like this really contribute. I would think the classic experience is more based on mobs/gear/quests available and not stupid typos or spelling mistakes.

[wwoneo]

I can't help but laugh. I'm sitting here thinking to myself, if it was correct on live.. even if it took forever and we know its wrong - why not fix it like it should have been done. I can see the idea of providing a classic experience but does something like this really contribute. I would think the classic experience is more based on mobs/gear/quests available and not stupid typos or spelling mistakes.

If this is the case, and there is no value-added. Why bother changing it then? Doesn't really matter. Just extra work for the Devs and I would prefer them working on more important stuff.

[Ele]

Stay away from my immersive classic typos. We've worked very hard to source the original typos and implement them in game.

[Crashking]

If this is the case, and there is no value-added. Why bother changing it then? Doesn't really matter. Just extra work for the Devs and I would prefer them working on more important stuff.

I'm not sure what important thing you think the devs should be working on.. but last I checked they have implemented all the current content they are planning on releasing. Bugs are the only thing that comes to mind, and a small fix to a typo takes um yeah a century to correct (/sarcastic face). Overall, I really could careless as I probably would have just overlooked it. In the end, lets be honest, there is being strictly true and then there is a proximity of creation and by reading the forums here I think there is some leaning towards the later.

[Victorio]

It annoys the ocd players

[Thulack]

I can't help but laugh. I'm sitting here thinking to myself, if it was correct on live.. even if it took forever and we know its wrong - why not fix it like it should have been done. I can see the idea of providing a classic experience but does something like this really contribute. I would think the classic experience is more based on mobs/gear/quests available and not stupid typos or spelling mistakes.

It was actually right and got changed to the wrong spelling on purpose :) Your thinking is opposite of the box :P