Why was Slippery Slope Confirmed Thread deleted?

[Blitzers]

I'm just wondering? Was it because a pedophile was claiming he's a victim? It was just a news article. Why are we censoring this? I think parents would be interested in that story. I think the community deserves an answer.

[Blitzers]

I can understand deleting "Big's reply" his call for extermination is an extreme stance to take. The OP was just information being relayed to "this" community. Is it the moderators position that the OP bears responsibility for the response? I'm just curious what's acceptable?

[maskedmelon]

Because at least one person felt unhappy about having perfectly normal fetishes lumped so brazenly with detestable ones?

The most stinging part of any rebuke is the truth.

[Haynar]

It is not an open discussion. If some nutjob thinks its ok, it will not be discussed here.

H

[maerilith]

Thank god, you people need to learn how to set up personal bounderies and draw the line somewhere. A lot of people would be mad at me for option C.

But OP is mad @ Options A-Z.

So bad, so sad.

/pras haynar the trollslayer (http://www.project1999.com/forums/poll.php?do=showresults&pollid=1747)

[Blitzers]

So just to be clear here, relaying a news article discussing pedophilia is against the rules? Or equating 1 "morally accepted" act with an act that's not yet morally accepted is against the rules. Seriously, I just want to know where the arbitrary line is.

[Wiley]

an act that's not yet morally accepted

Why don't you have a seat over there?

[Pokesan]

So just to be clear here, relaying a news article discussing pedophilia is against the rules? Or equating 1 "morally accepted" act with an act that's not yet morally accepted is against the rules. Seriously, I just want to know where the arbitrary line is.

you are comparing homosexuality with pedophilia?

[nilbog]

Just no.

[Llandris]

The staff does not owe anybody an explanation if we deem content inappropriate.