View Full Version : Monk, how do you not choose iksar?
Beinen
11-15-2015, 07:03 PM
I saw some people arguing in OOC and told them to take it to the forums. Here you go.
Exp penalty, 1 extra delay on fists, and depending on how you feel about it, the tail is a positive or a negative.
Colgate
11-15-2015, 07:29 PM
u basically have to either be a newbie, retard, or roleplayer to make a human monk
there is no argument for it
Troxx
11-15-2015, 07:51 PM
Iksar is the undeniable min/max choice, and it's true they hold every advantage once the monk hits 60. They have more ac. They have more regen. They have worse bare fist ratio ... but nobody ever uses bare fists so it doesn't matter.
Knowing all that ... I still made a human monk. Why a human monk?
-Looks better (subjective, but /shrug)
-I like it better
-levels 20% faster
Most of all? I did it because I wanted a human monk - everyone and their mother plays an iksar monk.
/thread
And don't forget.
The Epic human monk Epic dps is slightly higher than the Iksar epic dps.
jolanar
11-15-2015, 10:58 PM
And don't forget.
The Epic human monk Epic dps is slightly higher than the Iksar epic dps.
wut
Pipip
11-15-2015, 11:53 PM
The only thing I regret about my iksar monk is that I wasn't able to do the sash and headband quests. Of course, you can just buy them. Or get a group together and kill Brother Qwinn, skipping the sash and headband quests altogether.
Come to think of it, I have no regrets rolling iksar.
Korain
11-16-2015, 12:42 AM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cVNeKx7VkgU
Most of all? I did it because I wanted a human monk - everyone and their mother plays an iksar monk.
The funny thing, though, is that there are a lot of human monks around. At *least* 1/3. Maybe even 40%. The monk class is so overpowered that even with a weak race it's quite good.
Sallan
11-16-2015, 01:45 AM
Most of all? I did it because I wanted a human monk
This. For me at least it's to re-live the nostalgia of my char back in '99. I've always played a human monk with the same name (even during the TLP servers)
Beinen
11-16-2015, 07:04 AM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cVNeKx7VkgU
That settles it
Human monk looks alot better, but its like picking a gnome warrior over a troll/ogre warrior. Just dumb. When your dragging corpses after your group wipes you will miss that innate regen from iksar while fd flopping yourself through a dungeon.
Also I think iksar has a ac bonus over monk.
arsenalpow
11-16-2015, 10:06 AM
Well there was no option prior to Kunark. Also tail=fail, everyone knows that.
maskedmelon
11-16-2015, 10:34 AM
Iksar are fricken' gross too, so there's that ^^
Thiefboy777
11-17-2015, 07:39 PM
Because Iksar racials are ridiculously OP and some people don't want easy mode.
Valura
11-18-2015, 01:06 AM
Female human monks are smexy. I want to see one in a Shroud of Longevity.
titanshub
11-19-2015, 09:18 AM
I can't believe all these smoothskin lies. Tails are awesome and have great, next generation, animations.
Also regen is pretty damn good at 56 but I didn't even notice it until like 50 or 51. It's obviously OP now though.
Atada
11-19-2015, 02:48 PM
... but nobody ever uses bare fists so it doesn't matter.
We do though. Ask any epic monk.
Human monks exist mostly from:
Pre Kunark, want to level faster or want to use good towns.
touchtonedialing
11-19-2015, 03:17 PM
Female human monks are smexy. I want to see one in a Shroud of Longevity.
This week or next most likely. Then Shrouds are going to start to rot.
Jimjam
11-19-2015, 04:52 PM
Human female monks are the best because you can make nun jokes. I guess.
jolanar
11-20-2015, 10:42 AM
Human female monks are the best because you can make nun jokes. I guess.
Human females look the best in robe graphics IMO. Human males look stupid in robes. Iksars look decent.
But that's all just opinion.
Vexenu
11-20-2015, 11:14 AM
There is no defensible argument for Humans except that of personal taste (cosmetic). Iksars are superior in every way statistically. The human superior ratio fists are a joke, as epic makes Human and Iksar fists 9/16, and even Kunark weapons (much less Velious) blow away non-epic fists.
Iksars should have been better balanced to account for their strengths. For example, imagine if Iksars had a STR or STA hard cap of 200, or slightly lower weapon skill caps than humans. You could balance Iksar Necromancers the same, with a 200 INT hard cap. The choice would then at least be more debatable.
Atada
11-20-2015, 11:39 AM
24% exp penalty is no joke. That's a pretty hefty balance.
Man0warr
11-20-2015, 12:24 PM
But irrelevant at 60. For a min/maxer that isn't a valid penalty.
Sage Truthbearer
11-20-2015, 01:09 PM
A lot of people started their Monks before Kunark when Iksar wasn't even an option. Other people just think Humans look better, and that matters to them more in how they enjoy their EQ hobby than being more powerful.
jolanar
11-20-2015, 02:28 PM
There is no defensible argument for Humans except that of personal taste (cosmetic). Iksars are superior in every way statistically. The human superior ratio fists are a joke, as epic makes Human and Iksar fists 9/16, and even Kunark weapons (much less Velious) blow away non-epic fists.
Iksars should have been better balanced to account for their strengths. For example, imagine if Iksars had a STR or STA hard cap of 200, or slightly lower weapon skill caps than humans. You could balance Iksar Necromancers the same, with a 200 INT hard cap. The choice would then at least be more debatable.
People actually cared about faction in Classic and Kunark though. Being KoS everywhere except Cabilis was a much bigger deal then. There was a lot less information around at the time and it was harder to get what info was available because it was all word of mouth. So things like invis banking etc was unknown.
Given today's 20/20 hindsight, it's pretty clear that Iksar's racials are OP for Necros and Monks.
Colgate
11-20-2015, 05:36 PM
faction doesn't work here like it did on live; you can become ally with all of those as an iksar, whereas i don't think it was possible to raise your faction above a certain point with many places
trist4n
11-21-2015, 09:23 AM
Honestly, I just enjoy the human monk over the Iksar monk. It's not a great argument, but I love my human monk.
fiveeauxfour
11-22-2015, 03:04 AM
Well there was no option prior to Kunark. Also tail=fail, everyone knows that.
chest is right
/vomit
chiefrocka
11-22-2015, 07:29 PM
I know a few human monk players who play a human because it's what they played on Live. Yeah, they miss out on a few things. I chose Iksar myself because Iksar.
Nixtar
11-23-2015, 08:03 PM
Iksar has some advantages over human monks but won't affect you nearly as much as choosing iksar or non-iksar when rolling necromancer. The extra ac and hp regen helps but that's it.
eisley
12-04-2015, 11:42 PM
A lot of people don't know you can FD/hide to use a KoS banker, or use sneak to be indifferent to use any vendor
nyclin
12-05-2015, 12:46 AM
And don't forget.
The Epic human monk Epic dps is slightly higher than the Iksar epic dps.
epic fists set your hands to 9/16, there's no difference for iksar
epic fists set your hands to 9/16, there's no difference for iksar
No.. You are wrong.
Go look again.
Epic non iksar monk damage/delay ratio is a different ratio
Sajan
12-07-2015, 03:03 PM
epic fists set your hands to 9/16, there's no difference for iksar
This is correct. No clue what that guy is reading.
Man0warr
12-07-2015, 03:29 PM
Pretty sure that's only non-epic where Humans have a better ratio.
Colgate
12-07-2015, 04:42 PM
both races get 9/16 ratio with epic
JurisDictum
12-07-2015, 09:30 PM
Many high-end monks made their characters before Kunark. Other than that, there is no power gaming reason to pick human. To me, it seems weird to put Sleeper's Tomb robes on human monks....when Kunark was out for 4+ years. But I understand people get sentimental about their characters.
There's a couple posts about Human monks being less common....not really bro. Human and Iksar monks are equally common at level 60.
Kender
12-07-2015, 09:45 PM
There is absolutely no doubt at all in any form that Iksar make the better monk from a min/max point of view
That said, I'm probably going to make a human monk
jolanar
12-12-2015, 12:10 PM
Another reason is you can barely notice the hp regen until you are 51+ where the difference skyrockets. Most people won't be willing to reroll at that point.
slappytwotoes
12-17-2015, 06:40 PM
No.. You are wrong.
Go look again.
Epic non iksar monk damage/delay ratio is a different ratio
No sir, you are wrong. Its 9/16 for both races. Damage parses prove
Thiefboy777
12-17-2015, 09:43 PM
Reasons to not be Iksar:
Limp wristed main hand punch animation.
Ridiculous 2hb blunt poke animation.
vBulletin® v3.8.11, Copyright ©2000-2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.