Bernie Sanders

[Ranndom]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xf_DS6QX8Fw
America 2016's future if Bernie Sanders get elected.

[iruinedyourday]

You linked a youtube video of a facebook page? We got a real genius posting here guys...

[Ranndom]

You linked a youtube video of a facebook page? We got a real genius posting here guys...

The intro of the video is an alternate means of showing the contents source.
Gee, are you literally that stupid you lack just basic sense? i mean what is broken in your damn mind?

[iruinedyourday]

gee are you literately that stupid that you think facebook should be a source for anyone? go like a post on kim kardashians facebook page

[quido]

very poorly drawn and ignorant "parallel"

[Ranndom]

very poorly drawn and ignorant "parallel"

The only thing its missing is the guy taking candy for himself.
Other than that, its exactly democratic socialism.

[Ranndom]

gee are you literately that stupid that you think facebook should be a source for anyone? go like a post on kim kardashians facebook page

Lol....Well theres an everquest facebook page....im pretty sure theres a bernie sanders one. But hey, since it cant be a source, im officially declaring anything and everything one the bernie sanders facebook page Illegitimate. The name bernie sanders and all pictures and words assosciated with the page are to declared as lies and anyone, including bernie sanders, that says otherwise is a liar. Courtesy of iruinedyourday, the fool who says the damndest things just because someone disagrees with him.
Hmph, commies these days.

[Lune]

What you and all the other blubbering, perennially ass-blasted republicans don't realize when you throw tantrums like the children in that video is that you don't even have enough candy to be worth taking.

In order for this stupid analogy to be accurate, it'd have to play out like this:

The adults have 10,000 pieces of candy. You're working your ass off to go trick or treating and at the end of the night you have 100 pieces of candy. Some other kid was lazy and retarded and only ended up with 60 pieces of candy.

The government comes along and takes 20 pieces of candy from everyone. The adults now have 9,980, you have 80, and the lazy kid now has 40.

The government's 60 pieces of candy are distributed as follows: 40 pieces are given back to the adults because Ayn Rand said whoever has the most candy carries the rest of society on their shoulders, creates jobs, and the prosperity trickles down because now they're going to give more candy to trick or treaters.

The other 20 are given to the lazy kid to keep him from egging their houses.

The adults now have 10,010 pieces of candy, you have 80, and the lazy kid has 60.

You start screaming and crying and making forum posts because the lazy kid got some of your candy. Meanwhile, the adults move their candy to an offshore account in the Caiman Islands and give trick or treaters the exact same amount of candy as they did before. In your world, you're a superstar because you worked so hard and got so much candy. Your meager analytical ability can't even comprehend the fact that the adults don't even have to work to get their candy, and that when people say inequality needs to be addressed, you're actually fucking stupid enough to believe they mean you.

[Ranndom]

What you and all the other blubbering, perennially ass-blasted republicans don't realize when you throw tantrums like the children in that video is that you don't even have enough candy to be worth taking.

In order for this stupid analogy to be accurate, it'd have to play out like this:

The adults have 10,000 pieces of candy. You're working your ass off to go trick or treating and at the end of the night you have 100 pieces of candy. Some other kid was lazy and retarded and only ended up with 60 pieces of candy.

The government comes along and takes 20 pieces of candy from everyone. The adults now have 9,980, you have 80, and the lazy kid now has 40.

The government's 60 pieces of candy are distributed as follows: 40 pieces are given back to the adults because Ayn Rand said whoever has the most candy carries the rest of society on their shoulders, creates jobs, and the prosperity trickles down because now they're going to give more candy to trick or treaters.

The other 20 are given to the lazy kid to keep him from egging their houses.

The adults now have 10,010 pieces of candy, you have 80, and the lazy kid has 60.

You start screaming and crying and making forum posts because the lazy kid got some of your candy. Meanwhile, the adults move their candy to an offshore account in the Caiman Islands and give trick or treaters the exact same amount of candy as they did before. In your world, you're a superstar because you worked so hard and got so much candy. Your meager analytical ability can't even comprehend the fact that the adults don't even have to work to get their candy, and that when people say inequality needs to be addressed, you're actually fucking stupid enough to believe they mean you.
Starting to think you're more deranged than iruinedyourday, or at least are misunderstanding my intentions, But at least smarter.
If i created my political opinions based on myself, what kind of douchebag would that make me? Well, id probably agree with iruinedyourday a lot more, because i sure do wanna put people in camps and have an interest in playing dictator. However, No power should ever be put in the hands of a man, but in the hands of a people. Inequality is hardly an issue. Does it bug me that desk humpers make 10x what i do? sure, but i couldnt give two shits because even though i prefer physical work i enjoy what i do.
The world would be a better place if everyone would just chill the hell out and Do as you do. But, under a socialist world, its Do as i do. Conformity to an extreme, Which only breeds hate and anger.
The fact is, Democratic Socialism is stealing.

[iruinedyourday]

This guy is at an all time dumb.

[Ranndom]

This guy is at an all time dumb.

I swear you have a minimalist grasp on understanding words.

[Luminari]

The intro of the video is an alternate means of showing the contents source.
Gee, are you literally that stupid you lack just basic sense? i mean what is broken in your damn mind?

Says the retard that doesn't believe in God and thinks the Universe magically shit itself out from nothingness. /facepalm

[Ranndom]

Says the retard that doesn't believe in God and thinks the Universe magically shit itself out from nothingness. /facepalm

So what makes you think your god can shit itself out from nothingness /deskface

[Slathar]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xf_DS6QX8Fw
America 2016's future if Bernie Sanders get elected.

possibly the dumbest thing ive seen in weeks.

hopefully you dont reproduce.

[SamwiseRed]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xf_DS6QX8Fw
America 2016's future if Bernie Sanders get elected.

ya lets let kids decide how we should govern ourselves.

fucking idiot.

[Ranndom]

ya lets let kids decide how we should govern ourselves.

fucking idiot.

Kids are the purest form of logic. Most are untainted, not corrupted by the world. Most, still have their humanity.

[Ranndom]

possibly the dumbest thing ive seen in weeks.

hopefully you dont reproduce.

Lol...you democrats seriously hate anything you dont agree with.

[quido]

Let's make this a more accurate parallel.

There's actually trillions of pieces of candy. The top 1% of all candy-owners, who each have millions and billions of pieces of candy, possess as much candy as the bottom 90% of candy-owners.

Every day these candy billionaires spend enormous sums of candy in paying manipulative people to lobby law makers to make the laws even more favorable to their candy cause so that they can collect their next billion candy pieces more easily. There is a lot of candy - enough for everyone to be safe and secure from candy hunger - and despite the fact that these people already have billions of pieces of candy, they just can't seem to get enough.

Meanwhile, the people at the bottom can't get enough candy to get by. The manipulative people that lobby law makers and public opinion are quite effective because the majority of people are stupid. They've convinced a bunch of morons to believe something that is actually untrue and counter to their self-interest - that free candy trade is their salvation. Legislation is passed and jobs are cut because the billionaire industry owners can pay someone in another country a few less pieces of candy to work for them. This job vacuum creates desperation and allows the candy billionaire owners to present their workers with even shittier candy compensation because they know that out there is someone worse off who would probably do their job for less candy. "Nevermind paying people an honest candy living," says the candy billionaires, "we've tanked the candy economy so badly and created such candy desperation that we'll never have to worry about people having the self-respect to say 'no' to us again."

In their defesense, the candy billionaires say, "hey we create the opportunity for people to earn more candy, and despite the fact that we are literally hoarding billions of pieces of candy, those pieces of candy will trickle down through the candy economy and bolster everyone." But they actually don't. In fact, many of these candy billionaires go to such great lengths to hang onto every last piece of candy that they hide their candy pieces on remote tropical islands so they don't have to contribute their fair share of candy to the system. That's right - when everyone is asked to give up some of their candy so that we can have candy roads and candy parks and candy schools and candy health care - something every person should have - the candy billionaires hide a good portion of their candy so that they can lie about how much candy they have and contribute less candy than what they are supposed to contribute.

The candy billionaires were so successful in lobbying for the elimination of candy trading regulations that they were able to create a candy lending bubble - so that they could collect even more candy pieces in the short term - that nearly destroyed the nation's candy economy. Not a single one of these financial candy terrorists ever went to jail. Now, despite their blunder, they control even more candy than when they first fucked everything up.

This time they won't screw us over, I promise.

[Ranndom]

Let's make this a more accurate parallel.

There's actually trillions of pieces of candy. The top 1% of all candy-owners, who each have millions and billions of pieces of candy, possess as much candy as the bottom 90% of candy-owners.

Every day these candy billionaires spend enormous sums of candy in paying manipulative people to lobby law makers to make the laws even more favorable to their candy cause so that they can collect their next billion candy pieces more easily. There is a lot of candy - enough for everyone to be safe and secure from candy hunger - and despite the fact that these people already have billions of pieces of candy, they just can't seem to get enough.

Meanwhile, the people at the bottom can't get enough candy to get by. The manipulative people that lobby law makers and public opinion are quite effective because the majority of people are stupid. They've convinced a bunch of morons to believe something that is actually untrue and counter to their self-interest - that free candy trade is their salvation. Legislation is passed and jobs are cut because the billionaire industry owners can pay someone in another country a few less pieces of candy to work for them. This job vacuum creates desperation and allows the candy billionaire owners to present their workers with even shittier candy compensation because they know that out there is someone worse off who would probably do their job for less money. "Nevermind paying people an honest candy living," says the candy billionaires, "we've tanked the candy economy so badly and created such candy desperation that we'll never have to worry about people having the self-respect to say 'no' to us again."

In their defesense, the candy billionaires say, "hey we create the opportunity for people to earn more candy, and despite the fact that we are literally hoarding billions of pieces of candy, those pieces of candy will trickle down through the candy economy and bolster everyone." But they actually don't. In fact, many of these candy billionaires go to such great lengths to hang onto every last piece of candy that they hide their candy pieces on remote tropical islands so they don't have to contribute their fair share of candy to the system. That's right - when everyone is asked to give up some of their candy so that we can have candy roads and candy parks and candy schools and candy health care - something every person should have - the candy billionaires hide a good portion of their candy so that they can lie about how much candy they have and contribute less candy than what they are supposed to contribute.

The candy billionaires were so successful in lobbying for the elimination of candy trading regulations that they were able to create a candy lending bubble - so that they could collect even more candy pieces in the short term - that nearly destroyed the nation's candy economy. Not a single one of these financial candy terrorists ever went to jail. Now, despite their blunder, they control even more candy than when they first fucked everything up.

This time they won't screw us over, I promise.
Dude...That was perfect. Hahahaha

[KagatobLuvsAnimu]

/thread (https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=XM-HJT8_esM)

[Pokesan]

/thread (https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=XM-HJT8_esM)

Good video. Good enough infact that I can't properly decide whether you, or I, am the victim of the joke. Let's let the thread decide!

IGNORED USERS ARE BANNED FROM COMMENTING BELOW THIS POINT

[Slathar]

Lol...you democrats seriously hate anything you dont agree with.

im a republican. you, however, are an idiot.

[JackFlash]

two party systems works!

[wts]

What you and all the other blubbering, perennially ass-blasted republicans don't realize when you throw tantrums like the children in that video is that you don't even have enough candy to be worth taking.

In order for this stupid analogy to be accurate, it'd have to play out like this:

The adults have 10,000 pieces of candy. You're working your ass off to go trick or treating and at the end of the night you have 100 pieces of candy. Some other kid was lazy and retarded and only ended up with 60 pieces of candy.

The government comes along and takes 20 pieces of candy from everyone. The adults now have 9,980, you have 80, and the lazy kid now has 40.

The government's 60 pieces of candy are distributed as follows: 40 pieces are given back to the adults because Ayn Rand said whoever has the most candy carries the rest of society on their shoulders, creates jobs, and the prosperity trickles down because now they're going to give more candy to trick or treaters.

The other 20 are given to the lazy kid to keep him from egging their houses.

The adults now have 10,010 pieces of candy, you have 80, and the lazy kid has 60.

You start screaming and crying and making forum posts because the lazy kid got some of your candy. Meanwhile, the adults move their candy to an offshore account in the Caiman Islands and give trick or treaters the exact same amount of candy as they did before. In your world, you're a superstar because you worked so hard and got so much candy. Your meager analytical ability can't even comprehend the fact that the adults don't even have to work to get their candy, and that when people say inequality needs to be addressed, you're actually fucking stupid enough to believe they mean you.

Well done. Also:

quido scores! You really should go pro.

[Nextwave]

Greedy candy billionaires.

[Efwan]

Jesus Ranndom just stop posting.

[Big_Japan]

thread has AIDS

yall need TRUMP

http://i59.tinypic.com/ws6a8l.jpg

[Ranndom]

Jesus Ranndom just stop posting.

Jesus Efwan stop reading. I dont have your balls in a vice, perhaps get some self control and manage yourself?

[iruinedyourday]

Worried about the beta cucks thinking bernie sanders is there enemy. Cus ours do.

[Big_Japan]

hey guys I think you found your way into the wrong thread, there is a thread about the 2016 presidential race located here (http://www.project1999.com/forums/showthread.php?t=205549). You should probably direct discussion to this thread for continuity's sake.

ty!

http://i61.tinypic.com/9749bb.jpg

[iruinedyourday]

Page 3 is going away

http://media.giphy.com/media/9nPKbPsH86jSM/giphy.gif

[KagatobLuvsAnimu]

Page 3 is going away

http://media.giphy.com/media/9nPKbPsH86jSM/giphy.gif

Poster child for killjoy male feminists.

No wonder the new buzz is feminists complaining they don't want you shits.

[iruinedyourday]

dont know what you mean lol i rarely do!

http://media.giphy.com/media/9nPKbPsH86jSM/giphy.gif

[KagatobLuvsAnimu]

No matter how hard you try, she'll never suck your dick. (http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2015/oct/19/why-i-wont-date-another-male-feminist#comment-61698344)

[iruinedyourday]

did u nkow if u mix kagafoone, bigj and iruined yourday in a blender it makes the most toxic shit ever?

http://www.acclaimmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/Vom.png

[KagatobLuvsAnimu]

Trying too hard.

[Big_Japan]

toshiro kagafune

http://i61.tinypic.com/30shz4i.gif

[Orruar]

Worried about the beta cucks thinking bernie sanders is there enemy. Cus ours do.

Pretty sure Bernie Sanders is the king of the cucks. I mean, this is the look of a man who just watched his wife get ravaged.

https://slimgr.com/images/2015/10/18/cd58e56071d171dc8f74c082f5b717a3.png

[Big_Japan]

Pretty sure Bernie Sanders is the king of the cucks. I mean, this is the look of a man who just watched his wife get ravaged.

https://slimgr.com/images/2015/10/18/cd58e56071d171dc8f74c082f5b717a3.png

are you really bringing up "that one time" again!!!

cut it out buddy, that's just not fair.

[Pokesan]

i, too, dislike bern for being nice to black folks

[iruinedyourday]

Trying too hard.

when ru going let me tell the community we have been fucking irl kaga its not fair.

[Big_Japan]

i, too, dislike bern for being nice to black folks

bait.fmv

[Pokesan]

i just wish bernie had summoned the police to beat the shit out of them. then i could really get behind his candidacy!

[Big_Japan]

i just wish bernie had summoned the police to beat the shit out of them. then i could really get behind his candidacy!

you have to put the worm on it before the fish see the hook

[Big_Japan]

if TRUMP ever did get some groids bloodied up at one of his rallies on my behalf i would probably increase support tho tbqh

[Pokesan]

this summer i learned the word "cuck". now i am using it to describe everyone i disagree with. its great.

[iruinedyourday]

kaga is in the shower or he would reply guys we jsut fucked so hard irl

[KagatobLuvsAnimu]

Libel

[Big_Japan]

u spelt "librul" wrong

[iruinedyourday]

cus of course that statement was not libel

https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/-Y9Q8Xd_xFRA/UyoXeKh653I/AAAAAAAABNU/n64vdfykN08/w500-h731/kawaii-cosplay-sexy-897018.png

[Big_Japan]

^ me in 30 years

(jk my legs & arms are shaved as we speak)

[iruinedyourday]

tonight the forum be like

http://i.imgur.com/Eg8yATJ.gif

but its time for me to go home. bernie sanders is the best, love you guys!

[Big_Japan]

hey guys I think you found your way into the wrong thread, there is a thread about the 2016 presidential race located here (http://www.project1999.com/forums/showthread.php?t=205549). You should probably direct discussion to this thread for continuity's sake.

ty!

http://i61.tinypic.com/9749bb.jpg

[iruinedyourday]

http://i.imgur.com/HUdUjo0.gif

http://i.imgur.com/2bFA14J.gif

[Lurikeen]

Vote Bernie. You'll get high, get addicted, sell your bunghole for $10 to buy donuts, but you'll have all the freebies government can afford you!

[Pokesan]

Vote Bernie. You'll get high, get addicted, sell your bunghole for $10 to buy donuts, but you'll have all the freebies government can afford you!

what u got against donut?

[iruinedyourday]

to be fair only under republican polices are you forced to sell your bunghole to buy food.

[Lurikeen]

to be fair only under republican polices are you forced to sell your bunghole to buy food.

Which policies?

[iruinedyourday]

Which policies?

Here you go: http://www.dailykos.com/story/2014/09/01/1326246/-Adding-up-the-billions-wasted-by-the-House-Republicans

From October 1 through 16, 2013, the Federal Government entered a shutdown and curtailed most routine operations after the Republican led Congress failed to enact legislation appropriating funds for fiscal year 2014. During the shutdown, approximately 800,000 federal employees were indefinitely furloughed and another 1.3 million were required to report to work without known payment dates.

The financial services company Standard & Poors estimated that the shutdown, which lasted just over two weeks, cost $1.5 billion per day, took a total of $24 billion out of the U.S. economy, and shaved 0.6% off fourth-quarter GDP growth.

Here’s a breakdown of some of the economic cost:

About $3.1 billion in lost government services, according to the research firm IHS.

$152 million per day in lost travel spending, according to the U.S. Travel Association.

$76 million per day lost because of National Parks being shut down, according to the National Park Service.

$217 million per day in lost federal and contractor wages in the Washington D.C. metropolitan area alone.

Hundreds of thousands of federal workers bore the economic brunt of the shutdown. But small businesses also suffered from frozen government contracts and stalled business loans. Tourism suffered from closed national parks, and military families had to cope without childcare and other services.

TOTAL: $25,000,650,000

Here’s a state-by-state breakdown of the net loss of Federal medicaid expansion funds:

Alabama: -$943,000,000

Alaska: -$229,000,000

Florida: -$5,038,000,000

Georgia: -$2,862,000,000

Idaho: -$297,000,000

Kansas: -$950,000,000

Louisiana: -$1,655,000,000

Maine: -$294,000,000

Mississippi: -$431,000,000

Missouri: -$2,249,000,000

Nebraska: -$738,000,000

North Carolina: -$2,591,000,000

Oklahoma: -$1,264,000,000

South Carolina: -$807,000,000

South Dakota: -$224,000,000

Texas: -$9,217,000,000

Utah: -$719,000,000

Virginia: -$2,839,000,000

Wisconsin: -$1,848,000,000

Wyoming: -$166,000,000

This totals more than 30 billion in rejected funds.

Republicans have squandered money on hubristic, base-rousing engagements and re-investigations, and forfeited money available for a wholly legitimate and beneficial expansion of health coverage for low-income families. Sadly, it’s not them who are left counting the costs.

I mean lets be honest, straight up, The republican party doesnt think "economicially" it functions to destroy our goverment, and uses religious zelotry to rally voters. Its a bastardization of what the part once was.

I mean hell who is the leading candidiate for 2016? Ben Carson? Trump?

Do you really need another republican failure in the white house to teach you that the same broken things DONT make a right?

When is enough enough?

[Redi]

might vote bernie sanders purely based on the fact he has a gif of himself playing the bongos during debate

guy knows how to market dank memes

[Slathar]

bernie sanders is a smoke screen for big banks and wall street. sheep.

[Lurikeen]

Here you go: http://www.dailykos.com/story/2014/09/01/1326246/-Adding-up-the-billions-wasted-by-the-House-Republicans

From October 1 through 16, 2013, the Federal Government entered a shutdown and curtailed most routine operations after the Republican led Congress failed to enact legislation appropriating funds for fiscal year 2014. During the shutdown, approximately 800,000 federal employees were indefinitely furloughed and another 1.3 million were required to report to work without known payment dates.

The financial services company Standard & Poors estimated that the shutdown, which lasted just over two weeks, cost $1.5 billion per day, took a total of $24 billion out of the U.S. economy, and shaved 0.6% off fourth-quarter GDP growth.

Here’s a breakdown of some of the economic cost:

About $3.1 billion in lost government services, according to the research firm IHS.

$152 million per day in lost travel spending, according to the U.S. Travel Association.

$76 million per day lost because of National Parks being shut down, according to the National Park Service.

$217 million per day in lost federal and contractor wages in the Washington D.C. metropolitan area alone.

Hundreds of thousands of federal workers bore the economic brunt of the shutdown. But small businesses also suffered from frozen government contracts and stalled business loans. Tourism suffered from closed national parks, and military families had to cope without childcare and other services.

TOTAL: $25,000,650,000

Here’s a state-by-state breakdown of the net loss of Federal medicaid expansion funds:

Alabama: -$943,000,000

Alaska: -$229,000,000

Florida: -$5,038,000,000

Georgia: -$2,862,000,000

Idaho: -$297,000,000

Kansas: -$950,000,000

Louisiana: -$1,655,000,000

Maine: -$294,000,000

Mississippi: -$431,000,000

Missouri: -$2,249,000,000

Nebraska: -$738,000,000

North Carolina: -$2,591,000,000

Oklahoma: -$1,264,000,000

South Carolina: -$807,000,000

South Dakota: -$224,000,000

Texas: -$9,217,000,000

Utah: -$719,000,000

Virginia: -$2,839,000,000

Wisconsin: -$1,848,000,000

Wyoming: -$166,000,000

This totals more than 30 billion in rejected funds.

Republicans have squandered money on hubristic, base-rousing engagements and re-investigations, and forfeited money available for a wholly legitimate and beneficial expansion of health coverage for low-income families. Sadly, it’s not them who are left counting the costs.

I mean lets be honest, straight up, The republican party doesnt think "economicially" it functions to destroy our goverment, and uses religious zelotry to rally voters. Its a bastardization of what the part once was.

I mean hell who is the leading candidiate for 2016? Ben Carson? Trump?

Do you really need another republican failure in the white house to teach you that the same broken things DONT make a right?

When is enough enough?

You really think that all those policies have been given to us by the Republicans alone? I recall congress being controlled by Democrats for many years with a Democratic president who signed all these laws. That fact probably doesn't make a difference to you though, or does it?

[iruinedyourday]

More on how republicans fuck up our economy and treat the american people like shit: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-politics/wp/2015/11/04/house-democrats-gop-blocking-investigation-into-high-drug-prices/

And yea you can say that the quoted policies are democrats faults too buddy but youd not be speaking the truth.

[Nirgon]

He's not going after the top 1% but anyone making more than 60k a year

Counting on it

[iruinedyourday]

thats not true nirg not at all.

hes going after anyone making 250k a year or more, if you dont know that then you just are thinking with your hip and not your brain, pal.

Unless of course by going after the 60k a year you mean, hes going after a way to lock in your retirement and make sure you have better health care and quality of life with employers not to mention, more employment for that salary range.

[KagatobLuvsAnimu]

thats not true nirg not at all.

hes going after anyone making 250k a year or more, if you dont know that then you just are thinking with your hip and not your brain, pal.

Unless of course by going after the 60k a year you mean, hes going after a way to lock in your retirement and make sure you have better health care and quality of life with employers not to mention, more employment for that salary range.

Citation needed.

[iruinedyourday]

prob too many words for you, or you think forbes is some biassed libtard forum who knows how your mind works

http://www.forbes.com/sites/peterjreilly/2015/08/30/tax-planning-for-the-risk-of-a-bernie-sanders-win/

[KagatobLuvsAnimu]

The 250k figure is talking about social security benefits not taxation. According to Forbes. I also love the...
The document talks about closing loopholes but doesn't get specific.

[Orruar]

The 250k figure is talking about social security benefits not taxation. According to Forbes. I also love the...

Often when they say "close loopholes", they mean remove deductions that people making as little at $40k a year are likely to take. Republicans do this too. And if anyone says they're for balanced budgets, but don't specify what government spending they're willing to cut, then they're talking out of their ass. There's no way we could tax enough to cover current levels of spending.

[iruinedyourday]

Often when they say "close loopholes", they mean remove deductions that people making as little at $40k a year are likely to take.

can you give me a single example that would make you say this?

And please even if you can find a single example, since were talking about the democratic party here, make it an example where a democratic instituted a change like this.

[Pokesan]

what's the benefit/usefulness of a balanced budget

[KagatobLuvsAnimu]

what's the benefit/usefulness of a balanced budget

It makes a candidate sound like they give a fuck and theoretically gets them votes.

[Orruar]

what's the benefit/usefulness of a balanced budget

Is this a serious question? Assuming it is, I'll treat this like explaining it to a child, because I can't picture a grown adult asking something so obvious.

Every time the government spends more money than it collects in taxes for the year, it has to borrow money from someone to make up the difference. When you borrow money from someone, they charge you a fee for the time that you have the money. We call this fee "interest". Currently the US government spends over $200B a year on interest. That's $200B we don't have for other things like roads, health care, education, and bombing brown people. And that's a lot of money Timmy!

[iruinedyourday]

uh oh orruar is posting again: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eBPqksG9nbA

http://media0.giphy.com/media/aSTJbOerwCKqc/giphy.gif

[Pokesan]

Is this a serious question? Assuming it is, I'll treat this like explaining it to a child, because I can't picture a grown adult asking something so obvious.

Every time the government spends more money than it collects in taxes for the year, it has to borrow money from someone to make up the difference. When you borrow money from someone, they charge you a fee for the time that you have the money. We call this fee "interest". Currently the US government spends over $200B a year on interest. That's $200B we don't have for other things like roads, health care, education, and bombing brown people. And that's a lot of money Timmy!

I'm quite aware of what interest is, please provide an actual explanation instead of jerking yourself off about how dumb I am - everyone already knows that.

[Pokesan]

note: I will fart in your dinner if you even write the word 'China'.

Fairly warned, be ye, says I.

[iruinedyourday]

"when I talk to china" (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FE_hJrfAxVQ)

rekt

[iruinedyourday]

Bernie sanders didn't just say, 'i want to end the national prohibition of marijuana' during his campaign, he actually submitted a bill to end the national prohibition of marijuana.

This dude is one of a kind.

and america be all, 'i scared of things and dont know enough about things and think liberals and progressives are bad waah'

http://www.scribd.com/doc/288522361/Sanders-Marijuana-Bill

sigh....

[KagatobLuvsAnimu]

Nobody cares you hippie

[Orruar]

I'm quite aware of what interest is, please provide an actual explanation instead of jerking yourself off about how dumb I am - everyone already knows that.

Paying $200B a year in interest isn't enough of an explanation for why running neverending deficits is a bad plan? I don't understand what you're missing here.

Let's put it in personal finance terms. Would you go out and throw $100k worth of vacations on a credit card, and then just pay $20k in interest per year in perpetuity without ever paying off the debt? It's all about standard of living. Sure your standard of living was great during the $100k hookers and blow cruise through the Caribbean, but your standard of living is reduced until you pay off the debt.

Because of the profligate spending of previous generations, we're now having to waste $200B a year on interest rather than using it for useful things like roads, schools, and medical care. And this is during a time of historically low interest rates. The interest payments are only going to get more onerous as interest rates rise.

Edit: China

[Pokesan]

Thanks, I was hoping you were dumb enough to think the debts of nations are at all comparable to the debts of individuals.

Idiot.

I'll go slow and ask you - if revenue grows faster than debt, does the debt even matter?

[Orruar]

Thanks, I was hoping you were dumb enough to think the debts of nations are at all comparable to the debts of individuals.

Idiot.


If you want to invalidate an analogy, you'll need to actually point out how the analogy fails, and not just claim it fails and call it a day. Or are you on the intellectual level of iruinedyourday, who doesn't even warrant responses to his inane posts?

I'll go slow and ask you - if revenue grows faster than debt, does the debt even matter?

It all depends on whether incurring that debt is what led to the revenue growth. I'll use another analogy, which you'll probably just dismiss because it doesn't conform to your preconceived views, since the incurious mind hates incorporating new information.

If you borrow $50k to go to college and end up making an additional $20k a year as a result of your education, then you probably made a wise move (depending on interest rate). Your standard of living was improved through your borrowing/investment.

If you borrow $50k to go on a wild vacation and you get a $20k raise anyway, completely unrelated to the money you spent, then the debt and ensuing interest was not a good move. Your future standard of living is reduced due to your spending. It doesn't matter that your revenue grew faster than debt and are more able to pay off the debt than you were before you got the raise. It is unequivocal that your standard of living is now reduced. Maybe if you get enough raises the interest payment becomes inconsequential, but that is the hardly the case for the US debt.

And to drive a nail in the coffin, we're not growing revenue faster than debt. GDP growth has been anemic for the entire "recovery", while debt has continued its rocket-like trajectory. You can compare either debt-to-GDP or debt-to-revenue and it has exploded over the past 3 decades, under republicans and democrats alike. It started during the Reagan years and has continued unabated since (except for a period during the 90s boom). And it has really kicked into high gear over the last decade. You can blame that on the republicans, or the democrats, it doesn't much matter to me. But do you really think all that debt we have incurred has been for the better and was wisely invested for future growth? Are we going to start getting some dividend payments for the trillions we spent fighting brown people in the desert?

https://floodingupeconomics.files.wordpress.com/2011/04/us-gross-public-debt-as-a-percentage-of-gdp.png

[Big_Japan]

we already covered the part where weed prohibition is bread & circus buddy

ps i didnt read none of dat shit up above this post^^^^

[iruinedyourday]

aint nobody got time for that.

everyone welcome back the fine fellow BJ

[Pico]

i live in alberta and people keep saying we lost our 'job' because of oil shitting furiously out of any new leaky earth orifice around the globe. they say when you lose your job its really time to hunker down and cut all spending to infrastructure and social services, and that the province shouldnt spend money on things like lavish vacations. :confused:

hopefully the prime minister of alberta is working hard putting out those applications for a new job for alberta because my anus prolapsed once again last night and i really need the hospitals to live.

[Pokesan]

If you want to invalidate an analogy, you'll need to actually point out how the analogy fails, and not just claim it fails and call it a day. Or are you on the intellectual level of iruinedyourday, who doesn't even warrant responses to his inane posts?

I have neither the time nor the inclination to disabuse you of the notion that government debt is the same as kitchen table bill paying. If you want to believe something so dumb, by all means keep at it. I'll be here to ridicule you.

Please do not trash our fellow posting pal IRYD, it's quite rude.



And to drive a nail in the coffin, we're not growing revenue faster than debt. GDP growth has been anemic for the entire "recovery", while debt has continued its rocket-like trajectory.

Funny, GDP has grown just fine every year in the last ten, except for the 2008/2009 crash when it shrunk slightly.

Maybe revenue is the issue and Bernie has the right goddamn idea - if we raise taxes, we won't have to borrow all that money you're so worried about paying interest on?

Isn't that the most elegant solution - increase government revenue so we won't have to 'waste money' on those pesky loans you're so frightened of?

[Pokesan]

aint nobody got time for that.

everyone welcome back the fine fellow BJ

Big J you get any new tattoos in Sikorsky gulag? WB sorry for reporting you

[Big_Japan]

how do u even report??? they took the button away after i used it 2 spam emails 2 amelinda+rogean back in the day

also my body is a temple & its only tattoos are scars gained in the struggle

[Pokesan]

how do u even report??? they took the button away after i used it 2 spam emails 2 amelinda+rogean back in the day

also my body is a temple & its only tattoos are scars gained in the struggle

Report = PM an adult (Sikorsky or guides) and they'll ban whoever you ask them to.

I misspoke earlier though, I think Llandris banned you subsequent to you posting that pic of 'the Noid' as a black fellow. I did not send a PM

[Big_Japan]

an adult (Sikorsky or guides)

http://i.imgur.com/aPd7A8I.jpg

[Orruar]

I have neither the time nor the inclination to disabuse you of the notion that government debt is the same as kitchen table bill paying.

Learn what an analogy is. It doesn't mean two things are identical in every aspect, but it is a way of comparing similar aspects of two or more things. The ability to correctly apply and interpret analogies is one of the hallmarks of intelligence.



Funny, GDP has grown just fine every year in the last ten, except for the 2008/2009 crash when it shrunk slightly.

GDP growth has been anemic for a recovery. After the giant dip we had in 2008/2009, it was expected a recovery would look like 4-5% for a couple years at least (previous recoveries were even stronger, with 4%+ for multiple years). The best year we've had since then is 2010 with 2.5% growth, and the average is under 2%. And even if you consider that "just fine" (pretty much no economist agrees with you), it still hasn't grown nearly as quickly as debt, which has nearly doubled in the same time that GDP has increased 20%. That's not sustainable, and I think you know this.

Maybe revenue is the issue and Bernie has the right goddamn idea - if we raise taxes, we won't have to borrow all that money you're so worried about paying interest on?

Isn't that the most elegant solution - increase government revenue so we won't have to 'waste money' on those pesky loans you're so frightened of?

And now you're deflecting from the original point. Remember that this was a discussion over whether we should have balanced budgets, and not an argument over how to achieve that goal. It now appears that you do believe in balanced budgets after all. I'm glad I was able to convince you of the wisdom of collecting enough money to cover what we're spending. Good discussion.

[sOurDieSel]

So Bernies solution to overspending by the government is to increase taxes on citizens...which will lead to more government spending and expansion which will lead to more debt and more taxation...

How about the government stop spending so much and taxing people to death. More taxes and bigger government are not the solution to already high taxes and out of control government spending.

[Pokesan]

And now you're deflecting from the original point. Remember that this was a discussion over whether we should have balanced budgets, and not an argument over how to achieve that goal. It now appears that you do believe in balanced budgets after all. I'm glad I was able to convince you of the wisdom of collecting enough money to cover what we're spending. Good discussion.

It was never a hill I meant to die on, I wanted this discussion to take place. Suggesting governmental revenue increases to fix your non-problem is no surrender and only meant to irritate you.

Wish more would lend their thoughts on the topic.

[iruinedyourday]

So Bernies solution to overspending by the government is to increase taxes on citizens...which will lead to more government spending and expansion which will lead to more debt and more taxation...

How about the government stop spending so much and taxing people to death. More taxes and bigger government are not the solution to already high taxes and out of control government spending.

Increase tax on 2% of citizens derp

[sOurDieSel]

Ok so you increase taxes on the "1%" of the super rich.

How does that help with out of control government spending? It only allows the government to continue the cycle of spending beyond their means.

[Pokesan]

Ok so you increase taxes on the "1%" of the super rich.

How does that help with out of control government spending? It only allows the government to continue the cycle of spending beyond their means.

Spending beyond their means doesn't apply to nations in the world of global finance. Grow faster than your debt payments and it's a non-issue.

[Raev]

Spending beyond their means doesn't apply to nations in the world of global finance. Grow faster than your debt payments and it's a non-issue.

We aren't growing faster than our debt payments, we are PRINTING faster. So far we haven't seen the logical inflationary results because the real world is still in a massive deflationary recession. Eventually the central banks will fuck up and interest rates will go from 0% to 50%+ virtually overnight as people suddenly refuse to take dollars/euros/yen/yuan/other fiat junk. And that is when the shit will REALLY hit the fan.

[iruinedyourday]

Ok so you increase taxes on the "1%" of the super rich.

How does that help with out of control government spending? It only allows the government to continue the cycle of spending beyond their means.

First thing you do is stop putting dip shit republicans in power. Thats the only way to stop out of control government spending.

Bernie sanders is against all of this: https://www.nationalpriorities.org/cost-of/

Ridiculous spending is NOT spending the money we collect on taxes on the people and instead spending it on wars we dont need & corporate bailouts.

The governments role is to provide human services for its citizens... we dont live here under a government because of its mercy, its job is to make our time living here better. But right now we collect taxes and allow small parties to use it to get richer, we spend it on wars we dont need (that Bernie has voted and fought against unlike all the other candidates).

Roads, police, healthcare, infrastructure, laws to protect the tax payers, education, regulations on food so you arnt eating food made from human shit.. that stuff isnt out of control spending. Thats the whole point in the first place. Thats what Bernie wants to change our taxation spending on.

Believe me, if a corporation was allowed to make food out of shit, and call it healthy, it would.

You want to stop out of control government spending? Dont attack the person who is fighting to do exactly that while hoisting up more people that are the cause of it in the first place.

[KagatobLuvsAnimu]

Milking that scapegoat to death.

[B4EQWASCOOL]

ITT: Obese people blindly, and passionately, arguing about shit they're too fat to change. Dumb. Fat.

[Pokesan]

the idiots at msnbc are wasting time on martin omalley instead of showing bernie v hilldawg round 2

this is why the left fails

[iruinedyourday]

left doesnt vote, left doesnt do shit. makes me so mad.

im going to move to Canada

[iruinedyourday]

Here is the live stream which basically feels like a giant commercial, god i hate the media:

http://www.msnbc.com/shift/watch/democratic-presidential-candidates-forum-561278531682

[iruinedyourday]

http://firebrandleft.com/university-100-accuracy-record-predicts-bernie-sanders-will-americas-next-president/

UNIVERSITY WITH 100% ACCURACY RECORD PREDICTS BERNIE SANDERS WILL BE AMERICA’S NEXT PRESIDENT

http://firebrandleft.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/wiu_2015_general_results.jpg

[KagatobLuvsAnimu]

It can't even get the winner of the republican primary correct. TRUMP is the only name that has a chance on that side.

[Big_Japan]

http://firebrandleft.com/university-100-accuracy-record-predicts-bernie-sanders-will-americas-next-president/

UNIVERSITY WITH 100% ACCURACY RECORD PREDICTS BERNIE SANDERS WILL BE AMERICA’S NEXT PRESIDENT

http://firebrandleft.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/wiu_2015_general_results.jpg

you can make the man's name as big as you want but it'll never be as BIG as TRUMP. PS: I use size 6 font not 7 for TRUMP buddy and only his last name, have a little class and don't spam the board like a wild octoroon.

[AzzarTheGod]

First thing you do is stop putting dip shit republicans in power. Thats the only way to stop out of control government spending.

Bernie sanders is against all of this: https://www.nationalpriorities.org/cost-of/

Ridiculous spending is NOT spending the money we collect on taxes on the people and instead spending it on wars we dont need & corporate bailouts.

The governments role is to provide human services for its citizens... we dont live here under a government because of its mercy, its job is to make our time living here better. But right now we collect taxes and allow small parties to use it to get richer, we spend it on wars we dont need (that Bernie has voted and fought against unlike all the other candidates).

Roads, police, healthcare, infrastructure, laws to protect the tax payers, education, regulations on food so you arnt eating food made from human shit.. that stuff isnt out of control spending. Thats the whole point in the first place. Thats what Bernie wants to change our taxation spending on.

Believe me, if a corporation was allowed to make food out of shit, and call it healthy, it would.

You want to stop out of control government spending? Dont attack the person who is fighting to do exactly that while hoisting up more people that are the cause of it in the first place.

As outrageous as the post may be, putting the brakes on corporate controlled government is both a left and right interest. Sadly capitalism does indeed lead to shit being sold in a pill bottle, substandard toxic food made with mass-production industrial grade pesticide, among other serious humanitarian concerns. Any candidate that campaigns on at least pushing back on special interests, even if futile, should get the vote. The Monsanto Act is a form of pseudo treason almost, since we the people didn't believe it made any sense at all. Nor did any politician that wasn't in the pocket.

The problem is if you rock the boat too much, you get a bullet through your head closed casket, in broad daylight hence why we haven't see a true progressive candidate since 1960. The special interest racket might just be too deeply entrenched in our system to do anything about and maybe its not realistic to vote for a Bernie Sanders, but someone who can just do the job and at least maintain the status quo. Realistically speaking I think its a done deal at this point I do believe we lost a part of democracy when the murder of the highest elected office in the nation went unsolved via lack of investigation.

Its nice to pretend otherwise though.

[Raev]

Believe me, if a corporation was allowed to make food out of shit, and call it healthy, it would.

This already happens. It's called Coke. However, no one is putting a gun to your head and forcing you to drink Coke. However, when your government dumps carcinogens in the water for a year (http://www.abc10.com/story/news/investigations/2015/11/04/75112994) you are just fucked.

It's like you people have some sort of mental block:

Government favors corporations with all sorts of anti-populist measures
Therefore the solution is more government, because THIS time it's gonna be on our side

[iruinedyourday]

No im talking literally human shit and call it bread. They would if they could.

WE can change government. Government can change corporations. We cannot change corporations without government.

Its that simple.

Without government you are helpless.

[Pokesan]

Realistically speaking I think its a done deal at this point I do believe we lost a part of democracy when the murder of the highest elected office in the nation went unsolved via lack of investigation.

Its nice to pretend otherwise though.

if you believe that sincerely then vroom vroom and vote Trump

[Raev]

WE can change government. Government can change corporations. We cannot change corporations without government.


Government *can* change corporations but they won't, because the politicians will make more money by siding with them. I wonder why you are incapable of seeing this.

[iruinedyourday]

Government *can* change corporations but they won't, because the politicians will make more money by siding with them. I wonder why you are incapable of seeing this.

Im incapable in seeing it becuse no matter what this statement you make right there, CAN be changed. It always CAN be changed.

And it DOES change.

If you want it to stop STOP VOTING REPUBLICAN SHILLS INTO OFFICE!

Bernie Sander is the perfect example of a candidate that WILL fix the problems that you have with government, but instead of trying to do anything about it, what do you suggest? MORE votes for corporate shills? Apathy?

Dont vote if you dont have any drive in you at all to fix the problems in our government.

But dont go around saying its hopeless, because it ISNT hopeless, you just think it is.

[Big_Japan]

Without government you are helpless.

At least this fascist is actually coming out and articulating his position instead of complaining about "Republicans", for once.

I think we might agree on more than you think, buddy. I just prefer my incontrollable, unanswerable gang of armed thugs who deserve eternity in the lake of fire to advocate for a category of people that specifically includes me. I'll never feel guilty for wanting to survive in this game of no good guys - that's what makes us different.

[iruinedyourday]

The diff between us is I am aware there are plenty great things government does for people. But you jaded suicidal psychopaths think the opposite is true.

Fuckn' volkswagen lies about shit it sells you, VW lol the Vanagen the beetle.. they're a company who if anyone was asked 10 years ago, whats the most conscientious corporation out there? they'd probably say VW.. and of course it turns out they've been lying through their teeth about every one of their products. Also I might add, its GOVERNMENT that is going to make them pay for that.

Without government you wouldn't be allowed to post your opinions anywhere, let alone had enough free time to play everquest.

[Peatree]

Bernie is the only one that really makes any sort of sense IMO.

[KagatobLuvsAnimu]

the future that Bern will bring to America, the future Iruinedyourday dreams of. (https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=44vzMNG2fZc)

[Pokesan]

the future that Bern will bring to America, the future Iruinedyourday dreams of. (https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=44vzMNG2fZc)

who are you even mad at here?

is it the people fleeing a warzone

or is it the people helping them?

what an ugly thing to post

[iruinedyourday]

who are you even mad at here?

is it the people fleeing a warzone

or is it the people helping them?

what an ugly thing to post

dude he constantly tries to tell me that, "australia is different thier gun laws may work there but they would NEVER work here" yet he thinks whats happening in europe & the middle east, where 72 nations all occupy about as much square milage as we have in the US alone.. is somehow EXACTLY THE SAME to american politics.

my eyes are rolling so hard

https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/736x/10/4b/67/104b679f9ac62a5809968628e593b7ee.jpg

[Raev]

who are you even mad at here? is it the people fleeing a warzone

How about hidden choice c) the US government which created ISIS and this whole mess in the first place?

they're a company who if anyone was asked 10 years ago, whats the most conscientious corporation out there? they'd probably say VW.. and of course it turns out they've been lying through their teeth about every one of their products..

I feel compelled to point out that Volkswagen was founded by Hitler.

[iruinedyourday]

I feel compelled to point out that Volkswagen was founded by Hitler.

I saw that coming a mile away when I was picking off the top of my head a company painted to look like the good guy.

But lets be honest, that doesnt mean anything about the companies philosopies.

Unless maybe you think in the board room of VW is this guy,

http://screenrant.com/wp-content/uploads/The-Red-Skull-Future-Marvel-Cinematic-Universe.jpg

laying in wait, biding his time, getting ready to take over the world!

[Lune]

the future that Bern will bring to America, the future Iruinedyourday dreams of. (https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=44vzMNG2fZc)

Implying it's any better with other candidates.

Bernie wants to import 3rd worlders as a matter of principle.

Hillary, and whatever Republican clown they go with, want to import them for economic reasons, mainly because the people paying them off stand to benefit from cheap labor / depressed wages.

[Raev]

How is it a matter of principle to import 3rd world workers who will compete for jobs with America's poor?

[iruinedyourday]

rofl we dont live in a world where we need to wall off people from the american dream because we have so many ignorant fucks voting republican that cant find work.

SORRY

[Lune]

How is it a matter of principle to import 3rd world workers who will compete for jobs with America's poor?

You're misinterpreting. This isn't something I agree with at all, I was simply saying:

The impetus for Bernie's retardation on this matter is his principles.

The motivation for the other candidates is bribery.

The word principle doesn't have a positive connotation. Hating Jews was one of Hitler's principles.

[iruinedyourday]

That feel when you are counting down how many posts will it take before we start seeing some bans.

http://i.imgur.com/zquno99.gif

[KagatobLuvsAnimu]

who are you mad at here?
is it the people fleeing a warzone?

I'm not mad at the between 6 and 7% of the individuals in this invasion of Europe who are actually Syrian refugees.

[iruinedyourday]

kagatabob is mad

[Lune]

"Every nation gets the government it deserves"

-Joseph de Maistre

[iruinedyourday]

“The best argument against democracy is a five-minute conversation with the average voter.”

-Winston Churchill

[Pokesan]

I'm not mad at the between 6 and 7% of the individuals in this invasion of Europe who are actually Syrian refugees.

Citation needed.

[sOurDieSel]

Why are the majority of these 'refugees' males of military age. I see like 1 women/child for ever 10+ males in most circumstances.

[Big_Japan]

Why are the majority of these 'refugees' males of military age. I see like 1 women/child for ever 10+ males in most circumstances.

It's called a hijrahchino and wait'll you see what it costs!

[KagatobLuvsAnimu]

Citation needed.

This is from September, the numbers have inflated since, a simple google search will give you more thorough numbers. (http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3240010/Number-refugees-arriving-Europe-soars-85-year-just-one-five-war-torn-Syria.html)

[iruinedyourday]

You guys are being insensitive

[Pokesan]

This is from September, the numbers have inflated since, a simple google search will give you more thorough numbers. (http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3240010/Number-refugees-arriving-Europe-soars-85-year-just-one-five-war-torn-Syria.html)

thedailymail?

you're smarter than this kaga. I'm very disappointed in you right now.

[KagatobLuvsAnimu]

thedailymail?

you're smarter than this kaga. I'm very disappointed in you right now.

They sourced their data in that article actually.

[Greengrocer 2.0]

A Bernie Sanders sounds like the name of a sandwich

[Orruar]

They sourced their data in that article actually.

You're wasting your time. Pokesan and iruinedyourday are notorious for asking for proof, then once proof arrives, they put their fingers in their ears and yell "la la la la i can't hear you" and then claim victory. Would you take the time to attempt a rational debate with a chimpanzee?

[iruinedyourday]

https://www.google.com/search?q=what+is+the+dailymail&rlz=1C1CHFX_enUS662US662&oq=what+is+the+dailymail&aqs=chrome..69i57j0l5.2287j0j7&sourceid=chrome&es_sm=93&ie=UTF-8

rofl kaga thinks fox news is news too. yikes

You're wasting your time. Pokesan and iruinedyourday are notorious for asking for proof, then once proof arrives, they put their fingers in their ears and yell "la la la la i can't hear you" and then claim victory. Would you take the time to attempt a rational debate with a chimpanzee?

I would LOVE it if you started posting more 'proof' about the shit you believe in.

go for it

LETS SEE HOW IT GOES FOR YA

http://www.readsleeprepeat.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/Evil-Smile-Adams-Family.gif

[Raev]

Eurostat suggests 20% of all asylum seekers were from Syria in 2014, not 7% (I would expect this number to rise in 2015, but still be far from a majority). http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Asylum_statistics

Regardless of their composition, it's hard to see this ending well. Europeans will not be enthusiastic to live under Sharia law, and Muslims will not be happy with European multiculturalism. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zMKqKruzZro

[Pokesan]

It's quite unreasonable to expect me, or anyone, to read a dailymail article.

Do go on ranting about how evil we are for disagreeing with you. :)

e: thank you Raev

[iruinedyourday]

"This just in humanist overlords create a totalitarian government to force their peaceful agenda on people"

-said no one, ever.

[iruinedyourday]

http://ftw.usatoday.com/2015/11/ronda-rousey-just-endorsed-bernie-sanders-for-president

http://i.imgur.com/p3s9sEE.png

[KagatobLuvsAnimu]

Ok. I'm not mad at the one in five "refugees" who are actually from Syria.

Happy?

Europe is still fucked either way.

[KagatobLuvsAnimu]

http://ftw.usatoday.com/2015/11/ronda-rousey-just-endorsed-bernie-sanders-for-president

http://i.imgur.com/p3s9sEE.png

Figured you'd hate her for refusing to fight men and not buying into your pay gap myth.

[AzzarTheGod]

Attractiveness +1

[iruinedyourday]

why do you hate her? cus shes got a bigger dick than you? yea that'dd upset me too.

[KagatobLuvsAnimu]

why do you hate her? cus shes got a bigger dick than you? yea that'dd upset me too.

Baseless implication is ridiculous.

[iruinedyourday]

ridiculously hilarious yes. Im this forums bill burr

[Pik]

I still like Bernie but i like the larry david impersonation just as much..

[Lojik]

More like Bill Richardson

[iruinedyourday]

im literately this servers christopher hitchens

[KagatobLuvsAnimu]

im literately this servers christopher hitchens

No. No you are not.

If anyone is this forum's Hitchens it's Lune

[iruinedyourday]

I am without a doubt this box's Jesus Christ.

[Orruar]

im literately this servers christopher hitchens

This server's Melissa Click.

[Big_Japan]

i'm this server and forum's tupac amaru shakur. i bring alot of revolutionary thought to the table and im likely to be assassinated by racist illuminati soon. If I disappear or die yall know what happen.

[Pokesan]

im gay

[sOurDieSel]

the future that Bern will bring to America, the future Iruinedyourday dreams of. (https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=44vzMNG2fZc)

3 days and the video already has over 650k views.

Breitbart even picked it up without editing out the last part.

http://www.breitbart.com/london/2015/11/11/watch-anti-migrant-video-going-viral-across-europe/

This is the future of all countries that allow the 3rd world invasion to continue unchecked.

SHUT IT DOWN
TRUMP 2016

[Pokesan]

"Keep, ancient lands, your storied pomp!" cries she
With silent lips. "Give me your tired, your poor,
Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free,
The wretched refuse of your teeming shore.
Send these, the homeless, tempest-tost to me,
I lift my lamp beside the golden door!"

[iruinedyourday]

kaga and sour are both now masterbating to a supermarket tabloid and acting like its news. kek

[iruinedyourday]

i bring alot of revolutionary thought to the table and im likely to be assassinated by racist illuminati soon. If I disappear or die yall know what happen.

future offtopic p99 fan meetup

https://coubsecure-a.akamaihd.net/get/b4/p/coub/simple/cw_gif_big/b38df8cf417/6962670b9434468746c15/1411293042_1391285608_1nqyn6v_lg0t.gif

[Raev]

http://davidsevera.tumblr.com/post/130220421479/an-imagined-dialog-on-immigration-between-two

Actually quite interesting given the direction this thread turned in with the video. I've been forced to readjust some of my views!