View Full Version : If You Could 2box on Red: In Theory Thread.
Farzo
08-19-2014, 08:47 PM
I am not talking about mini-max'ing.... I am talking about what 2 classes you would enjoy playing on Red in a 2box setting and not be pushed in to playing for max efficiency classes you don't enjoy.
Considering both PvE+PvP, and boxing in both contexts.
I.e 2x Druids, 2x Wizards, or Wiz+Druid with targeting/assist macro's etc would be great for PvP, but what about PvE?
Personally I'd do Pal+Shm, not great PvPability I'd think, but as far as survivability+pve'ing it might be viable. Stuns, Slows, Buffs, Rez, Heals, DoTs, Tank and Spank combo and as we all know in Velious both classes become better than in Classic/Kunark.
Discuss:
Clark
08-19-2014, 08:52 PM
Druid/Sham, Ench/Sham, or Monk/Sham.
heartbrand
08-19-2014, 09:02 PM
Bard Warrior prolly
Supreme
08-19-2014, 09:22 PM
Cleric/Beastlord
mugien
08-19-2014, 09:23 PM
2 boxing and RMT's are legal here already.
Not Salem
08-19-2014, 10:36 PM
I wouldn't play if box'ing was legal
Bazia
08-19-2014, 10:54 PM
same
Haynar
08-19-2014, 11:30 PM
If 2 boxing were allowed, the real question is what 3 chars people would play. They wouldn't stop at just 2.
H
Greegon
08-19-2014, 11:41 PM
wouldnt do much, many would still not play
Sirken
08-20-2014, 12:34 AM
id do mage / necro. i just think itd be fun.
Eslade
08-20-2014, 01:04 AM
Cleric / enchanter
Smedy
08-20-2014, 01:16 AM
1. whatever class i wanted to play for pvp
2. whatever class people needed me for on raids
heartbrand
08-20-2014, 07:39 AM
If 2 boxing were allowed, the real question is what 3 chars people would play. They wouldn't stop at just 2.
H
You mean like how half the server already boxes now?
Bazia
08-20-2014, 07:40 AM
thats a bit of an exaggeration
no where near half
1 enchanter and 5 wizards
Swish
08-20-2014, 08:00 AM
Gotta be Hidden Forest style or not worth, so...
1 of each class.
Not_Kazowi
08-20-2014, 08:07 AM
War clr or monk shm
Samsung
08-20-2014, 08:30 AM
Cleric + Warrior
Kergan
08-20-2014, 09:54 AM
Depends how self sufficient you want to be and if you just want speed to 60 or want to actually do some good money/item camps later on. Can't beat ench/cleric for PVE farming at the end game. Druid/mage super fast level combo with utility.
Cheesypoof
08-20-2014, 10:02 AM
imo everyone who posted in this thread dreams of cheating and should be preemptively banned.
Including GMs.
Well everyone besides me...
Derubael
08-20-2014, 10:22 AM
6 warriors. 1 tank 5 on a bandage chain.
Iandyan
08-20-2014, 10:29 AM
2 rangers
Mac Drettj
08-20-2014, 10:45 AM
ranger cleric and farm seb
SamwiseRed
08-20-2014, 11:22 AM
6 rangers with windstriker
jcmtg
08-21-2014, 11:42 PM
Cleric Monk
Silent
08-21-2014, 11:58 PM
The thing about allowing boxing on a pvp server, Most people can't box for shit when it comes to PVP and are generally worse off boxing then they would have been playing 1v1. The easiest might be a full buffed cleric just spamming heals, But from vztz which had boxing most people were terrible at it which lead to many easy kills.
edit - shaman/monk most likely though! I would say rogue/shaman, but that wouldn't work too well since by time a shaman would be able to torpor slow tank stuff for the rogue to backstab you wouldn't need exp anymore. Never been a huge fan of wizards/druids/mages granted with the right gear they are pretty rape.
Agatha
08-22-2014, 12:52 AM
If 2 boxing were allowed, the real question is what 3 chars people would play. They wouldn't stop at just 2.
H
i have a p2 400mhz 8mb of ram, shared video card, i can just barely run 2 boxes at 15fps each, there is no way i could run another
id do mage / necro. i just think itd be fun.
I have tried, its to hard. you have to keep 2 casters moving, you'd need to use MQ, or you do it the ghetto way and auto run the other caster away from the battle while using the other cast to nuke. rinse repeat, its a pain in the ass.
The thing about allowing boxing on a pvp server, Most people can't box for shit when it comes to PVP and are generally worse off boxing then they would have been playing 1v1. The easiest might be a full buffed cleric just spamming heals, But from vztz which had boxing most people were terrible at it which lead to many easy kills.
edit - shaman/monk most likely though! I would say rogue/shaman, but that wouldn't work too well since by time a shaman would be able to torpor slow tank stuff for the rogue to backstab you wouldn't need exp anymore. Never been a huge fan of wizards/druids/mages granted with the right gear they are pretty rape.
your right, the best box for actuall PVP on this server is a melee with a cleric.
mtb tripper
08-22-2014, 12:58 AM
Bard Warrior prolly
dethbringre
08-23-2014, 03:03 PM
Mage + Shaman
Buhbuh
08-23-2014, 03:19 PM
i have a p2 400mhz 8mb of ram, shared video card, i can just barely run 2 boxes at 15fps each, there is no way i could run another
I have tried, its to hard. you have to keep 2 casters moving, you'd need to use MQ, or you do it the ghetto way and auto run the other caster away from the battle while using the other cast to nuke. rinse repeat, its a pain in the ass.
your right, the best box for actuall PVP on this server is a melee with a cleric.
Open admission of guilt - not enough to go on here.
Tewaz
08-23-2014, 03:23 PM
Enc/Cleric for dat pve.
Kastro
08-25-2014, 12:23 AM
Ogre SK and Halfing Cleric was lots of fun post 50 and on raids.. Good utility, simple to play... could also do some cool things with CH and FD. though sk Shaman was pretty sweet... just takes more clicking..
After 2 boxing for so long on VZTZ playing one toon was pretty boring to me...
sofa king
08-25-2014, 03:01 AM
Nec enchanter
Farzo
08-25-2014, 04:36 AM
When I played on eqmac I used to 3box a pal/chanter/druid and it was amazing for Chardox2.0 crawls.
Good times, miss that server.
---
Seems the popularity swings to combos with shaman/chanters.
vBulletin® v3.8.11, Copyright ©2000-2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.