View Full Version : US and A is dumb, you should all be in jail.
abbud
07-18-2014, 05:44 AM
In an online world where anyone can hide behind a mask of virtual anonymity, it can be easy to get carried away and do things deemed unconscionable in real life. However, one Mississippi man is facing up to ten years in jail after a half-hearted threat made in a game brought the federal authorities to his door.
- See more at: http://www.opposingviews.com/i/society/crime/josh-pillault-face-ten-years-jail-after-online-threat-goes-awry#sthash.Rt82Lwsy.dpuf
abbud
07-18-2014, 06:01 AM
This kid, Josh Pillault went on a drunken rage and replied with death threats (seem familiar, anyone?)
Recently got sentenced to 72 months of prison after 9 months in custody.
First ammendment - nay, Murrica - YAY!
Eslade
07-18-2014, 07:59 AM
Wow, that is bill shit. 85%of this community is going to jail.
Sektor
07-18-2014, 08:00 AM
Hopefully Maximillen gets arrested for his crimes. =P
mostbitter
07-18-2014, 08:48 AM
Hopefully Maximillen gets arrested for his crimes. =P
nah cant touch this
HippoNipple
07-18-2014, 10:16 AM
This kid, Josh Pillault went on a drunken rage and replied with death threats (seem familiar, anyone?)
Recently got sentenced to 72 months of prison after 9 months in custody.
First ammendment - nay, Murrica - YAY!
Yeah our forefathers fought for a country where you had the freedom to threaten the lives of innocent families.
mostbitter
07-18-2014, 12:03 PM
they kind of did if you think about it since back in the day speaking your mind was considered dangerous and actually did put families at risk but i digress cus u trollin
HippoNipple
07-18-2014, 12:12 PM
they kind of did if you think about it since back in the day speaking your mind was considered dangerous and actually did put families at risk but i digress cus u trollin
This is the complete opposite situation though. You are saying people were threatened for speaking their mind. If speaking your mind is threatening others lives then it has backfired and destroys the whole point of the amendment.
The end goal is that no one should fear for their safety. If someone is seriously threatening another's safety they should be punished.
mostbitter
07-18-2014, 12:26 PM
if you read the article it clearly states the threats where not serious and they did not possess the means to act upon them
HippoNipple
07-18-2014, 12:28 PM
Did not read, was just responding to Abbud's comment.
vBulletin® v3.8.11, Copyright ©2000-2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.