PDA

View Full Version : Game Mechanics: Atramentous Shield should be back slot usable


skorge
03-28-2013, 02:25 PM
I came across an old SK forum that stopped threads in 2002...i found out that apparently this shield was back slot usable in our time frame (post is from 08/01 and he says it was a year prior to this at least)...here's the link to the thread: http://thecrossroadstavern8833.yuku.com/reply/50493/Shield-Tactics#reply-50493 and a quote:

"Unless you got a CoF try getting a Ashenbone for Regular use and a Atrementous for your back ( It still fits on your back doesn't it? I remember about a year ago it did ) NE ways failing that do what everyone else says and Harmtouch me when you see me for being a waste of bandwidth."

Itap
03-28-2013, 02:29 PM
Strange I can't find patch notes indicating they changed it to secondary only. I wonder if he's confused with lodi shield? He doesn't seem to confident in that post

skorge
03-28-2013, 02:37 PM
yeah it was a good find for me, i never played a SK so i dont have a clue, maybe it was one of those things that only SK's knew about - do you have a list of all the patch notes?

Itap
03-28-2013, 02:52 PM
http://tski.co.jp/baldio/patch/19992002.php

Can't find a thing about it being changed

Bamzal Sherbet
03-28-2013, 03:29 PM
they dont post everything they change thats for sure. but it is true the guys post seems pretty vague .. but damn this would be hella cool

Itap
03-28-2013, 03:34 PM
they dont post everything they change thats for sure. but it is true the guys post seems pretty vague .. but damn this would be hella cool

Trust me, I know. I'm just saying if its not in patch notes and comments about it are very very vague, it's going to be hella hard to convince bog to change it.

Treats
03-28-2013, 05:56 PM
I cannot find any archived sites that list this as back slot, only secondary.

Pre-Velious item descriptions did not show the slots that were equipable.

It seems very unlikely with 28 AC.

Atennu
03-28-2013, 06:00 PM
I cannot find any archived sites that list this as back slot, only secondary.

Pre-Velious item descriptions did not show the slots that were equipable.

It seems very unlikely with 28 AC.

Not that unlikely, theres the cleric shield thats quested that is shield/back slot

http://everquest.allakhazam.com/db/item.html?item=2193

Treats
03-28-2013, 09:17 PM
Not that unlikely, theres the cleric shield thats quested that is shield/back slot

http://everquest.allakhazam.com/db/item.html?item=2193

Aegis of Life has 12AC though.

The only thing that comes close is Shield of the Immaculate and this item is very well documented being Back/Secondary useable.

Nirgon could have his friend look it up in the old database to see if it was ever changed.

Itap
03-28-2013, 09:21 PM
I'm pretty sure in that comment the person was confused with Lodi shield.

http://everquest.allakhazam.com/db/item.html?item=4061

The comment was posted post velious also /shrug

skorge
03-29-2013, 08:57 AM
I'm pretty sure in that comment the person was confused with Lodi shield.

http://everquest.allakhazam.com/db/item.html?item=4061

The comment was posted post velious also /shrug

If you read his comment he says it was about a year ago, the comment was posted in 08/01...Velious came out in 12/00 i believe, that is only 8 months ago - this could potentially rule out people thinking he was talking about Lodi shield

happyhappy
03-29-2013, 12:09 PM
All back items as of june 2000 (before where we are on timeline, pre-epic):
http://web.archive.org/web/20000619224420/http://everquest.allakhazam.com/equipment/back.htm

All shields as of june 2000:
http://web.archive.org/web/20000622092142/http://everquest.allakhazam.com/equipment/shields.htm

Note that Aegis of life is explicitly noted as back wearable in the shield section, but not Atramentous.

Unless you got a CoF try getting a Ashenbone for Regular use and a Atrementous for your back ( It still fits on your back doesn't it? I remember about a year ago it did

Nizzarr
03-29-2013, 01:54 PM
This was never back useable.

In any case, youd need way more evidences than a "I think I was wearing this on my back a year ago" from 2001.

Nirgon
03-29-2013, 03:32 PM
100% sure it wasn't a back item